A Randomized Clinical Study Investigating the Stain Removal Efficacy of Two Experimental Dentifrices.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1111/jerd.13373
C R Parkinson, G R Burnett, G Smith, M Pradhan, J Gallob, J Qaqish
{"title":"A Randomized Clinical Study Investigating the Stain Removal Efficacy of Two Experimental Dentifrices.","authors":"C R Parkinson, G R Burnett, G Smith, M Pradhan, J Gallob, J Qaqish","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate extrinsic tooth stain removal and whitening efficacy of two experimental dentifrices containing (i) 5% sodium tripolyphosphate (STP)/1% micronized alumina or (ii) 5% STP/1% micronized alumina with abrasive silica (ED2) compared to a regular fluoride dentifrice (RFD) following 8 weeks of use.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a single-center, randomized, controlled, blind, three-arm, stratified, parallel-group study. Eligible participants underwent clinical assessment of stain on the facial/lingual surfaces of maxillary and mandibular teeth using the modified Lobene stain index (MLSI), and shade of the facial surfaces of the central and lateral maxillary incisors using the VITA Bleachedguide 3D-Master (VITA) shade guide. Participants brushed twice daily with their assigned dentifrice and returned to the clinic for clinical assessments at weeks 4 and 8.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 272 participants completed the study (281 screened, 279 randomized). Both experimental dentifrices demonstrated statistically significant reduction from baseline and significant differences compared to RFD for MLSI and VITA shade scores at 4 and 8 weeks. 10 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in seven participants. All were resolved at the end of the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that dentifrices containing 5% STP/1% micronized alumina provide enhanced stain removal and shade improvements compared to a regular dentifrice. Study treatments were generally well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>A low-abrasion daily-use fluoride dentifrice containing 1% micronized alumina and 5% STP, suitable for people at risk of erosive toothwear and/or dentin hypersensitivity, can provide clinically meaningful superior reductions in tooth stain, which translates into a visibly noticeable improvement in tooth shade.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate extrinsic tooth stain removal and whitening efficacy of two experimental dentifrices containing (i) 5% sodium tripolyphosphate (STP)/1% micronized alumina or (ii) 5% STP/1% micronized alumina with abrasive silica (ED2) compared to a regular fluoride dentifrice (RFD) following 8 weeks of use.

Materials and methods: This was a single-center, randomized, controlled, blind, three-arm, stratified, parallel-group study. Eligible participants underwent clinical assessment of stain on the facial/lingual surfaces of maxillary and mandibular teeth using the modified Lobene stain index (MLSI), and shade of the facial surfaces of the central and lateral maxillary incisors using the VITA Bleachedguide 3D-Master (VITA) shade guide. Participants brushed twice daily with their assigned dentifrice and returned to the clinic for clinical assessments at weeks 4 and 8.

Results: A total of 272 participants completed the study (281 screened, 279 randomized). Both experimental dentifrices demonstrated statistically significant reduction from baseline and significant differences compared to RFD for MLSI and VITA shade scores at 4 and 8 weeks. 10 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in seven participants. All were resolved at the end of the study.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that dentifrices containing 5% STP/1% micronized alumina provide enhanced stain removal and shade improvements compared to a regular dentifrice. Study treatments were generally well tolerated.

Clinical significance: A low-abrasion daily-use fluoride dentifrice containing 1% micronized alumina and 5% STP, suitable for people at risk of erosive toothwear and/or dentin hypersensitivity, can provide clinically meaningful superior reductions in tooth stain, which translates into a visibly noticeable improvement in tooth shade.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项随机临床研究调查了两种实验性牙菌斑去除效果。
目的:本研究旨在评估两种实验牙膏(i)含有5%三聚磷酸钠(STP)/1%微粉氧化铝或(ii) 5% STP/1%微粉氧化铝与磨料二氧化硅(ED2))在使用8周后与常规含氟牙膏(RFD)相比的外在牙斑去除和美白效果。材料和方法:这是一项单中心、随机、对照、盲、三臂、分层、平行组研究。符合条件的参与者使用改良的Lobene染色指数(MLSI)对上颌和下颌骨的面部/舌面进行染色,并使用VITA Bleachedguide 3D-Master (VITA)阴影指南对上颌中门牙和侧门牙的面部表面进行阴影评估。参与者每天用指定的牙医刷牙两次,并在第4周和第8周返回诊所进行临床评估。结果:共有272名参与者完成了研究(筛选281名,随机279名)。两种实验牙组在4周和8周时的MLSI和VITA阴影评分与RFD相比,在统计学上都有显著的降低和显著的差异。7名参与者报告了10个与治疗相关的治疗不良事件。所有问题在研究结束时都得到了解决。结论:本研究表明,与普通牙膏相比,含有5% STP/1%微粉氧化铝的牙膏可以增强污渍去除和阴影改善。研究治疗通常耐受性良好。临床意义:一种含1%微氧化铝和5% STP的低磨损日用氟化物牙膏,适用于有糜蚀性牙齿磨损和/或牙本质过敏风险的人群,可以提供具有临床意义的牙斑显著减少,从而转化为明显的牙齿阴影改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
期刊最新文献
Implant Scanning Workflows for Fabricating Implant-Supported Prostheses Recorded by Using Intraoral Scanners With or Without Photogrammetry Technologies. How Universal Adhesive Systems With Nanoencapsulated Flavonoids Improve Long-Term Bonding to Caries-Affected Dentin. Prognosis of Fragment Reattachment in Anterior Crown Fractures: A Retrospective Study. The Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique for Coverage of Mucosal Recessions at Dental Implants. 3D-Printed Ultra-Thin Non-Prep Lithium Disilicate Veneers: A Proof-of-Concept Clinical Case.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1