Evaluating Paediatric Injury Hospitalisations From Indoor Trampoline Parks Across Australia: A Multi-Centre Study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Journal of paediatrics and child health Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1111/jpc.16770
Kei Yan Tsoi, Lisa N Sharwood, Guy D Eslick, Carlos Nunez, Anne Morris, Nicole Williams, Christine Erskine, Susan Adams
{"title":"Evaluating Paediatric Injury Hospitalisations From Indoor Trampoline Parks Across Australia: A Multi-Centre Study.","authors":"Kei Yan Tsoi, Lisa N Sharwood, Guy D Eslick, Carlos Nunez, Anne Morris, Nicole Williams, Christine Erskine, Susan Adams","doi":"10.1111/jpc.16770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The introduction and increasing popularity of indoor trampoline facilities has seen increases in the incidence of trampoline park injuries (TPIs), particularly amongst the paediatric population. A challenge to the development of effective injury prevention interventions is the limited study pool of detailed activity and outcome data to provide better understanding of the characteristics of injurious events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study of individuals under 16 years of age hospitalised after TPI from November 2018 to December 2021 was conducted. Patient demographics and TPI characteristics were collected through prospective case notifications from clinicians across Australia, via the Australian Paediatric Surveillance Unit. Additional data were collected using retrospective medical record review at two major paediatric centres in Australia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 48 cases of TPIs were reported: median age was 9.5 years with 28 (58.3%) being males. The most common injury mechanism was a fall on the trampoline (n = 34, 72.3%). The most commonly injured body region was upper limb (n = 27, 56.3%), followed by lower limb (n = 11, 22.9%): all limb injuries involved a fracture. Most patients required operative intervention (n = 37, 90.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results from this study suggest that serious injuries continue to occur at trampoline parks, and thus remain an injury concern that requires attention. This issue needs to be addressed with consistent application of the Australian Standard, along with other injury prevention initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":16648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.16770","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The introduction and increasing popularity of indoor trampoline facilities has seen increases in the incidence of trampoline park injuries (TPIs), particularly amongst the paediatric population. A challenge to the development of effective injury prevention interventions is the limited study pool of detailed activity and outcome data to provide better understanding of the characteristics of injurious events.

Methods: A cross-sectional study of individuals under 16 years of age hospitalised after TPI from November 2018 to December 2021 was conducted. Patient demographics and TPI characteristics were collected through prospective case notifications from clinicians across Australia, via the Australian Paediatric Surveillance Unit. Additional data were collected using retrospective medical record review at two major paediatric centres in Australia.

Results: In total, 48 cases of TPIs were reported: median age was 9.5 years with 28 (58.3%) being males. The most common injury mechanism was a fall on the trampoline (n = 34, 72.3%). The most commonly injured body region was upper limb (n = 27, 56.3%), followed by lower limb (n = 11, 22.9%): all limb injuries involved a fracture. Most patients required operative intervention (n = 37, 90.2%).

Conclusions: The results from this study suggest that serious injuries continue to occur at trampoline parks, and thus remain an injury concern that requires attention. This issue needs to be addressed with consistent application of the Australian Standard, along with other injury prevention initiatives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估澳大利亚室内蹦床公园的儿科损伤住院情况:一项多中心研究。
目的:室内蹦床设施的引入和日益普及已经看到了蹦床公园伤害(tpi)的发生率增加,特别是在儿科人群中。发展有效的伤害预防干预的一个挑战是有限的详细活动和结果数据的研究池,以更好地了解伤害事件的特征。方法:对2018年11月至2021年12月TPI术后住院的16岁以下患者进行横断面研究。通过澳大利亚儿科监测单位,通过澳大利亚各地临床医生的前瞻性病例通知收集患者人口统计学和TPI特征。在澳大利亚的两个主要儿科中心,通过回顾性医疗记录审查收集了其他数据。结果:共报告tpi 48例,中位年龄9.5岁,男性28例(58.3%)。最常见的损伤机制是在蹦床上摔倒(n = 34, 72.3%)。最常见的肢体损伤部位为上肢(n = 27, 56.3%),其次为下肢(n = 11, 22.9%),所有肢体损伤均为骨折。大多数患者需要手术干预(n = 37, 90.2%)。结论:本研究的结果表明,蹦床公园的严重伤害仍然存在,因此仍然是一个需要关注的伤害问题。这个问题需要与澳大利亚标准的一致应用以及其他伤害预防措施一起解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
487
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health publishes original research articles of scientific excellence in paediatrics and child health. Research Articles, Case Reports and Letters to the Editor are published, together with invited Reviews, Annotations, Editorial Comments and manuscripts of educational interest.
期刊最新文献
A General Paediatric Approach to Ankyloblepharon-Ectodermal Dysplasia-Cleft Lip/Palate Syndrome in Infancy: A Case Report. Issue Information The Association of Cyberspace and Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms in Children During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Effect of Pro-, Pre- and Synbiotic Supplementation on the Growth of Infants and Children: An Umbrella Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Accidental Trisodium Phosphate [Na3PO4] (TSP) Ingestion in a Child.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1