Diagnostic Accuracy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Antigen-Based Skin Tests (TBSTs) for Tuberculosis Infection Compared with TST and IGRA: A Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Pathogens Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.3390/pathogens13121050
Li Peng, Weijie Ma, Lei Zhong, Jiaru Yang, Hanxin Wu, Liangyu Zhu, Xun Huang, Rui Yang, Bingxue Li, Weijiang Ma, Xinya Wu, Jieqin Song, Suyi Luo, Fukai Bao, Aihua Liu
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> Antigen-Based Skin Tests (TBSTs) for Tuberculosis Infection Compared with TST and IGRA: A Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Li Peng, Weijie Ma, Lei Zhong, Jiaru Yang, Hanxin Wu, Liangyu Zhu, Xun Huang, Rui Yang, Bingxue Li, Weijiang Ma, Xinya Wu, Jieqin Song, Suyi Luo, Fukai Bao, Aihua Liu","doi":"10.3390/pathogens13121050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the IGRA, TST, and TBST by combining diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) to increase the reliability and accuracy of diagnostic methods and promote the eradication of TB. An electronic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted, from the date of establishment to September 30, 2024. Data were synthesized with frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses, a single-group rate meta-analysis algorithm, and a bivariate mixed-effects logistic regression model. Summarized receiver operating characteristic curves and Fagan nomograms were used to assess diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility. Deeks' funnel plots and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tools were used to assess publication bias and risk of bias. Sources of heterogeneity were investigated using subgroup analyses. Forty-nine studies were identified. The diagnostic performance of the three diagnostic methods for TB infection is summarized as follows: the pooled sensitivity was 77.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.856), and the pooled specificity was 80.3% (95% CI, 0.75-0.86). The sensitivity and specificity of the IGRA were 82.1% (95% CI, 0.78-0.86) and 81.1% (95% CI, 0.75-0.86), respectively, both higher than the TST. However, the TBST exhibited the highest specificity, at 98.5% (95% CI, 0.96-1.00), with a sensitivity of 78.7% (95% CI, 0.68-0.88), which was between that of the IGRA and TST. Subgroup analysis found that population categories and reference standards, among other factors, may be attributed to heterogeneity. In addition, the TST and IGRA add-on TBST can significantly improve diagnostic accuracy. In our study, the IGRA showed higher sensitivity, whereas the TBST showed higher specificity. Interestingly, under certain conditions, TST add-on TBST and IGRA add-on TBST showed better accuracy than TST and IGRA alone and could provide more effective guidance for clinical practice (PROSPERO CRD42023420136).</p>","PeriodicalId":19758,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13121050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the IGRA, TST, and TBST by combining diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) to increase the reliability and accuracy of diagnostic methods and promote the eradication of TB. An electronic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted, from the date of establishment to September 30, 2024. Data were synthesized with frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses, a single-group rate meta-analysis algorithm, and a bivariate mixed-effects logistic regression model. Summarized receiver operating characteristic curves and Fagan nomograms were used to assess diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility. Deeks' funnel plots and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tools were used to assess publication bias and risk of bias. Sources of heterogeneity were investigated using subgroup analyses. Forty-nine studies were identified. The diagnostic performance of the three diagnostic methods for TB infection is summarized as follows: the pooled sensitivity was 77.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.856), and the pooled specificity was 80.3% (95% CI, 0.75-0.86). The sensitivity and specificity of the IGRA were 82.1% (95% CI, 0.78-0.86) and 81.1% (95% CI, 0.75-0.86), respectively, both higher than the TST. However, the TBST exhibited the highest specificity, at 98.5% (95% CI, 0.96-1.00), with a sensitivity of 78.7% (95% CI, 0.68-0.88), which was between that of the IGRA and TST. Subgroup analysis found that population categories and reference standards, among other factors, may be attributed to heterogeneity. In addition, the TST and IGRA add-on TBST can significantly improve diagnostic accuracy. In our study, the IGRA showed higher sensitivity, whereas the TBST showed higher specificity. Interestingly, under certain conditions, TST add-on TBST and IGRA add-on TBST showed better accuracy than TST and IGRA alone and could provide more effective guidance for clinical practice (PROSPERO CRD42023420136).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结核分枝杆菌抗原皮肤试验(TBSTs)诊断结核感染的准确性与TST和IGRA的比较:网络荟萃分析
本研究旨在结合诊断试验准确性(DTA)分析和网络元分析(NMA),评价IGRA、TST和TBST的诊断准确性,以提高诊断方法的可靠性和准确性,促进结核病的根除。检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库,检索时间从建立之日至2024年9月30日。数据综合采用频率随机效应网络元分析、单组率元分析算法和双变量混合效应logistic回归模型。总结的受者工作特征曲线和费根图用于评估诊断的准确性和临床应用。使用Deeks漏斗图和诊断准确性研究质量评估2工具来评估发表偏倚和偏倚风险。采用亚组分析调查异质性的来源。49项研究被确认。三种诊断方法对TB感染的诊断性能总结如下:合并敏感性为77.9%(95%可信区间[CI], 0.69 ~ 0.856),合并特异性为80.3% (95% CI, 0.75 ~ 0.86)。IGRA的敏感性和特异性分别为82.1% (95% CI, 0.78 ~ 0.86)和81.1% (95% CI, 0.75 ~ 0.86),均高于TST。然而,TBST的特异性最高,为98.5% (95% CI, 0.96-1.00),敏感性为78.7% (95% CI, 0.68-0.88),介于IGRA和TST之间。亚组分析发现,除其他因素外,人口类别和参考标准可能归因于异质性。此外,TST和IGRA附加TBST可显著提高诊断准确率。在我们的研究中,IGRA具有更高的敏感性,而TBST具有更高的特异性。有趣的是,在一定条件下,TST加药TBST和IGRA加药TBST的准确性优于单独使用TST和IGRA,可以为临床实践提供更有效的指导(PROSPERO CRD42023420136)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pathogens
Pathogens Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1285
审稿时长
17.75 days
期刊介绍: Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817) publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes on all aspects of pathogens and pathogen-host interactions. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
A Case of Dibothriocephalosis (Dibothriocephalus latus) from Iseo Lake (Northern Italy): An Update on a Persistent Sanitary Issue. Molecular Epidemiology, Drug-Resistant Variants, and Therapeutic Implications of Hepatitis B Virus and Hepatitis D Virus Prevalence in Nigeria: A National Study. Assessment of Antibiotic Resistance Among Isolates of Klebsiella spp. and Raoultella spp. in Wildlife and Their Environment from Portugal: A Positive Epidemiologic Outcome. Complete Genome Sequence Analysis of the First Imported Mpox Virus Clade Ib Variant in China. Diversity and Distribution of Phytophthora Species Along an Elevation Gradient in Natural and Semi-Natural Forest Ecosystems in Portugal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1