Indoor and Outdoor Air Microbial Contamination During Different Reconstruction Methods of Historic Buildings.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Pathogens Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.3390/pathogens13121048
Anett Lippai, Ádám Leelőssy, Donát Magyar
{"title":"Indoor and Outdoor Air Microbial Contamination During Different Reconstruction Methods of Historic Buildings.","authors":"Anett Lippai, Ádám Leelőssy, Donát Magyar","doi":"10.3390/pathogens13121048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The quality of indoor air is dependent on a number of factors, including the presence of microorganisms that colonize the building materials. The potential for health risks associated with microbial contamination is a significant concern during the renovation of buildings. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of two reconstruction methods for historic buildings on air quality. The two reconstruction procedures were facadism, which preserves only the façade, demolishing the rest of the building and constructing a new building, and complete reconstruction, which involves internal renovation with a less intensive demolition. A total of 70 + 70 air samples, as well as surface and dust samples, were collected throughout the course of the reconstruction of the two buildings. In the case of facadism, total colony counts were found to be 2-4 times higher indoors than outdoors, even at the initial stage of the works. High concentrations of <i>Aspergillus</i> and <i>Penicillium</i> spp. were detected. During the less intensive reconstruction, the total colony count in the indoor air samples was initially lower at almost every sampling point than at the outdoor levels. With regard to fungi, <i>Penicillium</i> species were initially present at lower conidia concentrations, followed by <i>Aspergillus</i> species over time. In both buildings, elevated concentrations of airborne fungi were detected during the main reconstruction period. The fungal genera found in the indoor air were also detected on surfaces and in dust samples. Outdoor air samples collected from the vicinity of the buildings revealed elevated fungal counts at multiple sampling points, particularly in the case of facadism. Disinfection with dry fogging was implemented twice throughout the entire interior of the buildings. Following the first disinfection process, there was no notable decrease in colony-forming unit (CFU) counts in either building. However, the second disinfection resulted in a reduction in microbial concentration in the air. Our study confirms that the renovation of historical buildings can result in an elevated prevalence of fungal bioaerosols, which can be harmful to occupants. While the impact of the reconstruction remained within the range of urban background variability at distant (>1 km) locations, it caused local microbial contamination, often exceeding the detection limit in near-site samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":19758,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13121048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The quality of indoor air is dependent on a number of factors, including the presence of microorganisms that colonize the building materials. The potential for health risks associated with microbial contamination is a significant concern during the renovation of buildings. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of two reconstruction methods for historic buildings on air quality. The two reconstruction procedures were facadism, which preserves only the façade, demolishing the rest of the building and constructing a new building, and complete reconstruction, which involves internal renovation with a less intensive demolition. A total of 70 + 70 air samples, as well as surface and dust samples, were collected throughout the course of the reconstruction of the two buildings. In the case of facadism, total colony counts were found to be 2-4 times higher indoors than outdoors, even at the initial stage of the works. High concentrations of Aspergillus and Penicillium spp. were detected. During the less intensive reconstruction, the total colony count in the indoor air samples was initially lower at almost every sampling point than at the outdoor levels. With regard to fungi, Penicillium species were initially present at lower conidia concentrations, followed by Aspergillus species over time. In both buildings, elevated concentrations of airborne fungi were detected during the main reconstruction period. The fungal genera found in the indoor air were also detected on surfaces and in dust samples. Outdoor air samples collected from the vicinity of the buildings revealed elevated fungal counts at multiple sampling points, particularly in the case of facadism. Disinfection with dry fogging was implemented twice throughout the entire interior of the buildings. Following the first disinfection process, there was no notable decrease in colony-forming unit (CFU) counts in either building. However, the second disinfection resulted in a reduction in microbial concentration in the air. Our study confirms that the renovation of historical buildings can result in an elevated prevalence of fungal bioaerosols, which can be harmful to occupants. While the impact of the reconstruction remained within the range of urban background variability at distant (>1 km) locations, it caused local microbial contamination, often exceeding the detection limit in near-site samples.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史建筑不同改造方式对室内外空气微生物污染的影响
室内空气的质量取决于许多因素,包括寄生在建筑材料上的微生物的存在。与微生物污染有关的潜在健康风险是建筑物翻新期间的一个重大问题。本研究的目的是评估两种历史建筑重建方法对空气质素的影响。两种重建程序分别是facadism,即只保留立面,拆除建筑物的其余部分并建造新建筑物,以及完全重建,包括内部翻新和较少的拆除。在两栋建筑的整个重建过程中,共收集了70 + 70个空气样本,以及表面和灰尘样本。在法加德主义的情况下,即使在工程的初始阶段,室内的总菌落计数也比室外高2-4倍。检测到高浓度的曲霉和青霉菌。在较不密集的重建过程中,室内空气样本中的总菌落计数最初几乎在每个采样点都低于室外水平。关于真菌,青霉种最初存在于较低的分生孢子浓度,随后是曲霉种随着时间的推移。在这两座建筑物中,在主要重建期间检测到空气中真菌浓度升高。在室内空气中发现的真菌属也在表面和灰尘样本中检测到。从建筑物附近收集的室外空气样本显示,在多个采样点,真菌数量增加,特别是在真菌感染的情况下。在整个建筑内部进行了两次干雾消毒。在第一次消毒过程后,两个建筑物的菌落形成单位(CFU)计数均未显着下降。然而,第二次消毒导致空气中微生物浓度降低。我们的研究证实,历史建筑的翻新会导致真菌生物气溶胶的流行率升高,这可能对居住者有害。虽然重建的影响仍然在城市背景变异性的范围内,但它造成了当地的微生物污染,在近点样品中往往超过检测极限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pathogens
Pathogens Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1285
审稿时长
17.75 days
期刊介绍: Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817) publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes on all aspects of pathogens and pathogen-host interactions. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
A Case of Dibothriocephalosis (Dibothriocephalus latus) from Iseo Lake (Northern Italy): An Update on a Persistent Sanitary Issue. Molecular Epidemiology, Drug-Resistant Variants, and Therapeutic Implications of Hepatitis B Virus and Hepatitis D Virus Prevalence in Nigeria: A National Study. Assessment of Antibiotic Resistance Among Isolates of Klebsiella spp. and Raoultella spp. in Wildlife and Their Environment from Portugal: A Positive Epidemiologic Outcome. Complete Genome Sequence Analysis of the First Imported Mpox Virus Clade Ib Variant in China. Diversity and Distribution of Phytophthora Species Along an Elevation Gradient in Natural and Semi-Natural Forest Ecosystems in Portugal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1