Optimizing Swine Oral Fluid Sampling Procedures for Growing Pigs in Commercial Settings.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Pathogens Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.3390/pathogens13121097
Grzegorz Tarasiuk, Marta D Remmenga, Kathleen C O'Hara, Marian K Talbert, Sarah Mielke, Marisa L Rotolo, Pam Zaabel, Danyang Zhang, Jeffrey J Zimmerman
{"title":"Optimizing Swine Oral Fluid Sampling Procedures for Growing Pigs in Commercial Settings.","authors":"Grzegorz Tarasiuk, Marta D Remmenga, Kathleen C O'Hara, Marian K Talbert, Sarah Mielke, Marisa L Rotolo, Pam Zaabel, Danyang Zhang, Jeffrey J Zimmerman","doi":"10.3390/pathogens13121097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pen-based oral fluids are used extensively for surveillance and disease detection in swine, but there is sparse information on the sampling process itself. To address this shortcoming, we documented the pen-based oral fluid sampling process with the aim of optimizing the number of pigs in a pen that contributed to the sample. We quantified the effects of (1) previous experience with rope sampling (training), (2) the number of ropes suspended in the pen, and (3) sampling time on pig participation and pig-rope contact. A subset of pigs was clearly marked for individual identification and their interactions with ropes video recorded. Thereafter, pig-rope contacts were counted from the recordings, with \"contact\" defined as an individually identified pig clearly taking the rope into its mouth. Data were analyzed using appropriate models (R version 4.4.1 R core team 2024). Training, provision of additional ropes, and extended sampling time all increased pig participation across pen sizes. However, for routine oral fluid collection in the field, we recommend training pigs prior to hanging ropes for sample collection and increasing sampling time to maximize the pigs' contribution to the oral fluid sample. Importantly, these studies focused on pig behavior and not detection; thus, future studies should evaluate the impact of these same factors on the probability of detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":19758,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13121097","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pen-based oral fluids are used extensively for surveillance and disease detection in swine, but there is sparse information on the sampling process itself. To address this shortcoming, we documented the pen-based oral fluid sampling process with the aim of optimizing the number of pigs in a pen that contributed to the sample. We quantified the effects of (1) previous experience with rope sampling (training), (2) the number of ropes suspended in the pen, and (3) sampling time on pig participation and pig-rope contact. A subset of pigs was clearly marked for individual identification and their interactions with ropes video recorded. Thereafter, pig-rope contacts were counted from the recordings, with "contact" defined as an individually identified pig clearly taking the rope into its mouth. Data were analyzed using appropriate models (R version 4.4.1 R core team 2024). Training, provision of additional ropes, and extended sampling time all increased pig participation across pen sizes. However, for routine oral fluid collection in the field, we recommend training pigs prior to hanging ropes for sample collection and increasing sampling time to maximize the pigs' contribution to the oral fluid sample. Importantly, these studies focused on pig behavior and not detection; thus, future studies should evaluate the impact of these same factors on the probability of detection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化商业环境下生长猪口腔液取样程序。
基于笔的口液广泛用于猪的监测和疾病检测,但关于采样过程本身的信息很少。为了解决这一缺点,我们记录了基于笔的口腔液体取样过程,目的是优化猪圈中贡献样品的猪的数量。我们量化了以下因素的影响:(1)以前的绳子采样经验(训练),(2)围栏中悬挂的绳子数量,以及(3)采样时间对猪参与和猪与绳子接触的影响。一组猪被清楚地标记为个体识别,并记录了它们与绳索的相互作用。此后,从记录中计算猪绳接触的次数,“接触”定义为一只单独识别的猪明显将绳子叼进嘴里。数据分析使用合适的模型(R版本4.4.1 R核心团队2024)。培训、提供额外的绳索和延长采样时间都增加了猪的参与。然而,对于现场常规的口腔液采集,我们建议在悬挂绳子采集样本之前训练猪,并增加采样时间,以最大限度地提高猪对口腔液样本的贡献。重要的是,这些研究关注的是猪的行为,而不是检测;因此,未来的研究应该评估这些相同因素对检测概率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pathogens
Pathogens Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1285
审稿时长
17.75 days
期刊介绍: Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817) publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes on all aspects of pathogens and pathogen-host interactions. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
Antibiotic Resistance Trends in Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens and Eight-Year Surveillance of XDR Bloodstream Infections in a Western Greece Tertiary Hospital. Asymptomatic Malaria Cases and Plasmodium Species in Mainland Tanzania and Zanzibar Archipelago (Pemba). Deletion of gE in Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Leads to Increased Extracellular Virus Production and Augmented Interferon Alpha Production by Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells. Enhancement of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cell Responses with TIGIT Blockade Involves Trogocytosis. Novel Antigenic Variant Infectious Bursal Disease Virus Outbreaks in Japan from 2014 to 2023 and Characterization of an Isolate from Chicken.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1