Impact of trauma center status on radiology resident performance in detecting non-accidental trauma on the WIDI SIM exam.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1007/s00247-024-06158-2
Kevin Pierre, Abheek Raviprasad, Jay Talati, Isabella Amador, Alexandria Iakovidis, Christopher Sistrom, Roberta Slater, Linda Lanier, Evelyn Anthony, Anthony Mancuso, Dhanashree Rajderkar, Priya Sharma
{"title":"Impact of trauma center status on radiology resident performance in detecting non-accidental trauma on the WIDI SIM exam.","authors":"Kevin Pierre, Abheek Raviprasad, Jay Talati, Isabella Amador, Alexandria Iakovidis, Christopher Sistrom, Roberta Slater, Linda Lanier, Evelyn Anthony, Anthony Mancuso, Dhanashree Rajderkar, Priya Sharma","doi":"10.1007/s00247-024-06158-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether adult and pediatric trauma center status, as well as the presence of dedicated child protection teams, influences radiology resident performance in detecting non-accidental trauma on the Emergent/Critical Care Imaging Simulation (WIDI SIM) exam.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 639 WIDI SIM exam scores for four pediatric non-accidental trauma cases completed by radiology residents across 33 programs. Residents were stratified by level (R1-R4) and institutional factors, including adult trauma center status, pediatric trauma center status, and child protection team presence. Additionally, 2022 pediatric physical abuse counts per state were obtained from the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System and normalized between 0 and 1. We employed a negative binomial generalized linear model (GLM). The outcome was regressed on resident level, trauma center status variables, child protection team presence, and normalized abuse counts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher resident training level was significantly associated with better performance (R1=3.6, R2=5, R3=6.1, R4=7.9; P<0.001). Adult trauma center accreditation was also associated with higher scores (4.6 vs. 3.3; P<0.001). In contrast, pediatric trauma center status, child protection team presence, and normalized state-level abuse counts were not significantly associated with resident performance (all P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resident experience and adult trauma center accreditation were significantly associated with better radiology resident performance in detecting non-accidental trauma in a simulated call environment. Pediatric trauma center status, child protection team presence, and statewide abuse prevalence were not associated with detection performance. These findings suggest the need for targeted educational interventions at non-adult trauma centers and emphasize the importance of experience in developing diagnostic proficiency for non-accidental trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-06158-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether adult and pediatric trauma center status, as well as the presence of dedicated child protection teams, influences radiology resident performance in detecting non-accidental trauma on the Emergent/Critical Care Imaging Simulation (WIDI SIM) exam.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 639 WIDI SIM exam scores for four pediatric non-accidental trauma cases completed by radiology residents across 33 programs. Residents were stratified by level (R1-R4) and institutional factors, including adult trauma center status, pediatric trauma center status, and child protection team presence. Additionally, 2022 pediatric physical abuse counts per state were obtained from the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System and normalized between 0 and 1. We employed a negative binomial generalized linear model (GLM). The outcome was regressed on resident level, trauma center status variables, child protection team presence, and normalized abuse counts.

Results: Higher resident training level was significantly associated with better performance (R1=3.6, R2=5, R3=6.1, R4=7.9; P<0.001). Adult trauma center accreditation was also associated with higher scores (4.6 vs. 3.3; P<0.001). In contrast, pediatric trauma center status, child protection team presence, and normalized state-level abuse counts were not significantly associated with resident performance (all P>0.05).

Conclusion: Resident experience and adult trauma center accreditation were significantly associated with better radiology resident performance in detecting non-accidental trauma in a simulated call environment. Pediatric trauma center status, child protection team presence, and statewide abuse prevalence were not associated with detection performance. These findings suggest the need for targeted educational interventions at non-adult trauma centers and emphasize the importance of experience in developing diagnostic proficiency for non-accidental trauma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤中心状态对住院医师在WIDI SIM考试中检测非意外创伤表现的影响。
目的:评估成人和儿童创伤中心的状态,以及专门的儿童保护小组的存在,是否影响放射科住院医师在紧急/重症监护成像模拟(WIDI SIM)考试中检测非意外创伤的表现。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析了33个放射科住院医师完成的4例儿科非意外创伤病例的639个WIDI SIM考试分数。住院医师按等级(R1-R4)和机构因素进行分层,包括成人创伤中心状况、儿童创伤中心状况和儿童保护小组的存在。此外,从国家儿童虐待和忽视数据系统中获得了每个州2022年儿童身体虐待计数,并在0到1之间归一化。我们采用负二项广义线性模型(GLM)。结果回归到居民水平,创伤中心状态变量,儿童保护小组的存在,和正常化的虐待计数。结果:住院医师训练水平越高,表现越好(R1=3.6, R2=5, R3=6.1, R4=7.9;P0.05)。结论:住院医师的经验和成人创伤中心的认证与更好的放射科住院医师在模拟呼叫环境中检测非意外创伤的表现显著相关。儿童创伤中心的状态、儿童保护小组的存在和全州范围内的虐待发生率与检测性能无关。这些发现表明,在非成人创伤中心需要有针对性的教育干预,并强调了在发展非意外创伤诊断能力方面经验的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
期刊最新文献
Ultrasonographic diagnosis and follow-up of a special type of giant fetal hepatic hemangioma. Assessment of sacroiliitis using zero echo time magnetic resonance imaging: a comprehensive evaluation. Cerebrolith in hydranencephaly. Type IIA pulmonary artery sling with tracheobronchial anomalies. Application of simple preparation for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter study in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1