Role of preconception nutrition supplements in maternal anemia and intrauterine growth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1186/s13643-024-02726-7
Sumera Aziz Ali, Jeanine Genkinger, Ka Kahe, Linda Valeri, Nayab Khowaja, Nancy F Krebs, Louise Kuhn
{"title":"Role of preconception nutrition supplements in maternal anemia and intrauterine growth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Sumera Aziz Ali, Jeanine Genkinger, Ka Kahe, Linda Valeri, Nayab Khowaja, Nancy F Krebs, Louise Kuhn","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02726-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impaired intrauterine growth, a significant global health problem, contributes to a higher burden of infant morbidity and mortality, mainly in resource-poor settings. Maternal anemia and undernutrition, two important causes of impaired intrauterine growth, are prioritized by global nutrition targets of 2030. We synthesized the evidence on the role of preconception nutrition supplements in reducing maternal anemia and improving intrauterine growth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a review of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of preconception nutrition supplements on maternal hemoglobin, an indicator to estimate maternal anemia, and markers of intrauterine growth including birth weight, length, head circumference, and small for gestational age. Additionally, we examined preterm birth as an important perinatal outcome. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and Embase. We computed summary mean differences and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effect models. We employed I<sup>2</sup> and Cochran's Q test statistics to assess heterogeneity. We used a revised Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB version 2.0) and GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation) tools to assess the risk of bias and quality of evidence of eligible RCTs, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 20 eligible RCTs (n = 27,659 women). Preconception nutrition supplements (iron and folic acid, multiple micronutrients, and a lipid-based nutrient supplement) overall increased maternal hemoglobin by 0.30 g/dL ((0.03, 0.57); I<sup>2</sup> = 79%; n=9). However, we did not find a significant effect of the supplements on birth weight (12.25 gm ((- 22.66, 47.16); I<sup>2</sup> = 55%; n=10)), length (0.15 cm (- 0.26, 0.56); I<sup>2</sup> = 68%; n = 5), head circumference (- 0.23 cm (- 0.88, 0.43); I<sup>2</sup> = 84%; n=4), small for gestational age (RR 0.91 (0.80, 1.04); I<sup>2</sup> = 31%; n=8), or preterm birth (RR 0.93 (0.69,1.25); I<sup>2</sup> = 57%; n=12). In general, the quality of evidence was assessed as very low to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preconception nutrition supplements studied to date appear to reduce maternal anemia. However, it is uncertain whether there are beneficial effects of the supplements on intrauterine growth. Low quality of evidence warrants future well-designed RCTs to produce solid scientific data, particularly of a more comprehensive package of preconception nutrition supplements that include both macro- and micronutrients.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023464966.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11727609/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02726-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Impaired intrauterine growth, a significant global health problem, contributes to a higher burden of infant morbidity and mortality, mainly in resource-poor settings. Maternal anemia and undernutrition, two important causes of impaired intrauterine growth, are prioritized by global nutrition targets of 2030. We synthesized the evidence on the role of preconception nutrition supplements in reducing maternal anemia and improving intrauterine growth.

Methods: We undertook a review of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of preconception nutrition supplements on maternal hemoglobin, an indicator to estimate maternal anemia, and markers of intrauterine growth including birth weight, length, head circumference, and small for gestational age. Additionally, we examined preterm birth as an important perinatal outcome. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and Embase. We computed summary mean differences and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effect models. We employed I2 and Cochran's Q test statistics to assess heterogeneity. We used a revised Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB version 2.0) and GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation) tools to assess the risk of bias and quality of evidence of eligible RCTs, respectively.

Results: We identified 20 eligible RCTs (n = 27,659 women). Preconception nutrition supplements (iron and folic acid, multiple micronutrients, and a lipid-based nutrient supplement) overall increased maternal hemoglobin by 0.30 g/dL ((0.03, 0.57); I2 = 79%; n=9). However, we did not find a significant effect of the supplements on birth weight (12.25 gm ((- 22.66, 47.16); I2 = 55%; n=10)), length (0.15 cm (- 0.26, 0.56); I2 = 68%; n = 5), head circumference (- 0.23 cm (- 0.88, 0.43); I2 = 84%; n=4), small for gestational age (RR 0.91 (0.80, 1.04); I2 = 31%; n=8), or preterm birth (RR 0.93 (0.69,1.25); I2 = 57%; n=12). In general, the quality of evidence was assessed as very low to moderate.

Conclusion: Preconception nutrition supplements studied to date appear to reduce maternal anemia. However, it is uncertain whether there are beneficial effects of the supplements on intrauterine growth. Low quality of evidence warrants future well-designed RCTs to produce solid scientific data, particularly of a more comprehensive package of preconception nutrition supplements that include both macro- and micronutrients.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023464966.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孕前营养补充剂在母体贫血和宫内生长中的作用:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:宫内生长受损是一个重大的全球健康问题,主要是在资源贫乏的环境中,造成婴儿发病率和死亡率较高的负担。孕产妇贫血和营养不良是宫内生长受损的两个重要原因,是2030年全球营养目标的优先事项。我们综合了孕前营养补充剂在减少母体贫血和改善宫内生长中的作用的证据。方法:我们回顾了评估孕前营养补充剂对母体血红蛋白影响的随机对照试验(rct),血红蛋白是评估母体贫血的指标,以及子宫内生长的标志物,包括出生体重、身高、头围和胎龄小。此外,我们检查早产作为一个重要的围产期结局。我们检索了PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Central和Embase。我们使用随机效应模型计算了95%置信区间(ci)的总平均差异和风险比(RR)。我们采用I2和Cochran’s Q检验统计量来评估异质性。我们使用修订后的Cochrane风险偏倚(RoB 2.0版)和GRADE(分级推荐、评估、发展和评价)工具分别评估符合条件的随机对照试验的偏倚风险和证据质量。结果:我们确定了20个符合条件的rct (n = 27,659名女性)。孕前营养补充剂(铁和叶酸,多种微量营养素和基于脂质的营养补充剂)总体上使母体血红蛋白增加0.30 g/dL ((0.03, 0.57);i2 = 79%;n = 9)。然而,我们没有发现补充剂对出生体重的显著影响(12.25 gm (- 22.66, 47.16);i2 = 55%;N =10)),长度(0.15 cm (- 0.26, 0.56);i2 = 68%;头围(n = 5)——0.23厘米(- 0.88,0.43);i2 = 84%;n=4),胎龄小(RR 0.91 (0.80, 1.04);i2 = 31%;n=8)或早产(RR 0.93 (0.69,1.25);i2 = 57%;n = 12)。总的来说,证据的质量被评价为非常低到中等。结论:迄今为止研究的孕前营养补充剂似乎可以减少产妇贫血。然而,尚不确定补充剂是否对宫内生长有有益影响。低质量的证据保证了未来精心设计的随机对照试验能够产生可靠的科学数据,特别是包括宏量和微量营养素的更全面的孕前营养补充剂一揽子计划。系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD42023464966。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids for stroke and traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultra-processed foods and risk of all-cause mortality: an updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Using virtual patients to enhance empathy in medical students: a scoping review protocol. Research priority setting for implementation science and practice: a living systematic review protocol. Self-care interventions among women with gestational diabetes mellitus in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1