Bibliometric Analysis of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Research in South Korea.

IF 2.5 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.4046/trd.2024.0158
Geunin Lee, Young Ae Kang, Youngmok Park
{"title":"Bibliometric Analysis of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Research in South Korea.","authors":"Geunin Lee, Young Ae Kang, Youngmok Park","doi":"10.4046/trd.2024.0158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current research on nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is multidisciplinary; thus, proper organization is necessary to obtain comprehensive insights. Therefore, a bibliometric analysis was performed to identify NTM research characteristics in South Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Web of Science was searched for NTM articles authored by Koreans at Korean institutions until March 2023. We collected data on authors, publication year, article type, study design, research area, citations, research institutes, and funding sources for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 28,092 articles on NTM, Koreans authored 868. After excluding 167 unrelated studies, 701 relevant articles were analyzed. The first study was from 1992, with publication rates markedly increasing from 2004 onwards. Basic research constituted 41.3% (n=290) of papers, whereas clinical research represented 44.7% (n=313). Basic research consisted mostly of biochemistry studies (n=74, 10.6%), while clinical research primarily involved retrospective studies (n=113, 16.1%). Median citations were highest for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (median 23, interquartile range 15-93). Fifty-four institutions participated in NTM research, with the top five contributing to 71% (n=498) of the publications. The National Research Foundation of Korea was the most significant funding source, supporting 181 studies (32.5% of funded articles).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality and quantity of NTM research in South Korea has improved. However, it was concentrated within a few institutions and largely funded by few sources. Future research should use more diverse funding sources, be conducted in more institutions, and prioritize prospective study designs to enhance the understanding and treatment of NTM.</p>","PeriodicalId":23368,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2024.0158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current research on nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is multidisciplinary; thus, proper organization is necessary to obtain comprehensive insights. Therefore, a bibliometric analysis was performed to identify NTM research characteristics in South Korea.

Methods: The Web of Science was searched for NTM articles authored by Koreans at Korean institutions until March 2023. We collected data on authors, publication year, article type, study design, research area, citations, research institutes, and funding sources for analysis.

Results: Of the 28,092 articles on NTM, Koreans authored 868. After excluding 167 unrelated studies, 701 relevant articles were analyzed. The first study was from 1992, with publication rates markedly increasing from 2004 onwards. Basic research constituted 41.3% (n=290) of papers, whereas clinical research represented 44.7% (n=313). Basic research consisted mostly of biochemistry studies (n=74, 10.6%), while clinical research primarily involved retrospective studies (n=113, 16.1%). Median citations were highest for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (median 23, interquartile range 15-93). Fifty-four institutions participated in NTM research, with the top five contributing to 71% (n=498) of the publications. The National Research Foundation of Korea was the most significant funding source, supporting 181 studies (32.5% of funded articles).

Conclusion: The quality and quantity of NTM research in South Korea has improved. However, it was concentrated within a few institutions and largely funded by few sources. Future research should use more diverse funding sources, be conducted in more institutions, and prioritize prospective study designs to enhance the understanding and treatment of NTM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国非结核分枝杆菌研究的文献计量分析。
背景:目前对非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)的研究是多学科的;因此,要获得全面的见解,适当的组织是必要的。因此,本文采用文献计量学分析来确定韩国NTM研究的特征。方法:到2023年3月,在Web of Science检索韩国机构中韩国人撰写的NTM文章。我们收集了作者、出版年份、文章类型、研究设计、研究领域、引文、研究机构和资金来源等数据进行分析。结果:在NTM的28,092篇文章中,韩国人撰写了868篇。在排除167项不相关研究后,分析了701篇相关文章。第一项研究从1992年开始,从2004年开始,发表率显著增加。基础研究占41.3% (n=290),临床研究占44.7% (n=313)。基础研究以生物化学研究为主(n=74, 10.6%),临床研究以回顾性研究为主(n=113, 16.1%)。系统评价和荟萃分析的引用中位数最高(中位数23,四分位数范围15-93)。54家机构参与了NTM研究,其中排名前五的机构发表了71% (n=498)的论文。国立科学研究财团是最大的资金来源,资助了181项研究(占资助文章的32.5%)。结论:韩国NTM研究的质量和数量都有所提高。然而,它集中在几个机构内,资金来源也很少。未来的研究应使用更多样化的资金来源,在更多的机构进行,并优先考虑前瞻性研究设计,以增强对NTM的理解和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bibliometric Analysis of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Research in South Korea. Increased neutrophil elastase in affected lobes of bronchiectasis and correlation of its levels between sputum and bronchial lavage fluid. Korean Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Interstitial Lung Diseases: Connective Tissue Disease Associated Interstitial Lung Disease. Understanding of patients with severe COVID-19 using lung ultrasound. Disease Severity and Activity in Bronchiectasis: A Paradigm Shift in Bronchiectasis Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1