Working toward Personalized Intervention Advice: A Survey Study on Preference Heterogeneity in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Fatigue.

IF 1.9 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES MDM Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23814683241309676
Lian Beenhakker, Kim A E Wijlens, Christina Bode, Miriam M R Vollenbroek-Hutten, Sabine Siesling, Janine A van Til, Annemieke Witteveen
{"title":"Working toward Personalized Intervention Advice: A Survey Study on Preference Heterogeneity in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Fatigue.","authors":"Lian Beenhakker, Kim A E Wijlens, Christina Bode, Miriam M R Vollenbroek-Hutten, Sabine Siesling, Janine A van Til, Annemieke Witteveen","doi":"10.1177/23814683241309676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Many breast cancer survivors experience cancer-related fatigue (CRF), and several interventions to treat CRF are available. One way to tailor intervention advice is based on patient preferences. In this study, we explore preference heterogeneity regarding between-attribute and within-attribute preferences. In addition, we propose simple decision rules to match preferences to interventions. <b>Methods.</b> Nine attributes were included with dichotomized levels. Participants selected their preferred level per attribute and ranked the attributes using best-worst scaling. Between-attribute and within-attribute preferences were determined, together with their heterogeneity. Using decision rules, matching scores were calculated for a hypothetical intervention. <b>Results.</b> Sixty-seven breast cancer survivors completed the survey. They were on average 52 y old, 4.5 y after diagnosis, experienced CRF (6.5-7.2/10) on 3 dimensions (physical, mental, and emotional), and 43% already followed an intervention for CRF. Overall, participants ranked <i>costs</i> highest. Next to <i>costs</i>, <i>proven</i> <i>effectiveness</i> and <i>type of intervention</i> were also frequently ranked first. Only 13 participants (19%) shared the most common preference pattern of shorter interventions, daily sessions, shorter session time, a psychosocial intervention, no anonymity, and contact with a therapist and peers. Matching scores for a hypothetical intervention with attributes corresponding with the overall within-attribute preferences varied from 44% to 100%. <b>Conclusion.</b> A large heterogeneity in preferences of breast cancer survivors for CRF intervention attributes was demonstrated. Using simple decision rules, the effect of this heterogeneity on linking preferences to interventions with matching scores was demonstrated. <b>Implications.</b> Personalization of intervention advice is necessary due to preference heterogeneity. Tailored advice can result in higher involvement of patients in decision making, intervention adherence and satisfaction, and subsequently a potential higher quality of life after breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Many breast cancer survivors experience cancer-related fatigue for which many interventions exist.Our results show large preference heterogeneity in breast cancer patients' preferences for attributes of eHealth interventions.Based on this preference heterogeneity, intervention advice for cancer-related fatigue after breast cancer can be personalized, ultimately improving quality of life after breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":36567,"journal":{"name":"MDM Policy and Practice","volume":"10 1","pages":"23814683241309676"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726506/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683241309676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Many breast cancer survivors experience cancer-related fatigue (CRF), and several interventions to treat CRF are available. One way to tailor intervention advice is based on patient preferences. In this study, we explore preference heterogeneity regarding between-attribute and within-attribute preferences. In addition, we propose simple decision rules to match preferences to interventions. Methods. Nine attributes were included with dichotomized levels. Participants selected their preferred level per attribute and ranked the attributes using best-worst scaling. Between-attribute and within-attribute preferences were determined, together with their heterogeneity. Using decision rules, matching scores were calculated for a hypothetical intervention. Results. Sixty-seven breast cancer survivors completed the survey. They were on average 52 y old, 4.5 y after diagnosis, experienced CRF (6.5-7.2/10) on 3 dimensions (physical, mental, and emotional), and 43% already followed an intervention for CRF. Overall, participants ranked costs highest. Next to costs, proven effectiveness and type of intervention were also frequently ranked first. Only 13 participants (19%) shared the most common preference pattern of shorter interventions, daily sessions, shorter session time, a psychosocial intervention, no anonymity, and contact with a therapist and peers. Matching scores for a hypothetical intervention with attributes corresponding with the overall within-attribute preferences varied from 44% to 100%. Conclusion. A large heterogeneity in preferences of breast cancer survivors for CRF intervention attributes was demonstrated. Using simple decision rules, the effect of this heterogeneity on linking preferences to interventions with matching scores was demonstrated. Implications. Personalization of intervention advice is necessary due to preference heterogeneity. Tailored advice can result in higher involvement of patients in decision making, intervention adherence and satisfaction, and subsequently a potential higher quality of life after breast cancer.

Highlights: Many breast cancer survivors experience cancer-related fatigue for which many interventions exist.Our results show large preference heterogeneity in breast cancer patients' preferences for attributes of eHealth interventions.Based on this preference heterogeneity, intervention advice for cancer-related fatigue after breast cancer can be personalized, ultimately improving quality of life after breast cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
致力于个性化干预建议:乳腺癌相关疲劳患者偏好异质性的调查研究。
介绍。许多乳腺癌幸存者经历癌症相关疲劳(CRF),有几种治疗CRF的干预措施。有一种方法是根据病人的偏好来定制干预建议。在本研究中,我们探讨了属性间偏好和属性内偏好的异质性。此外,我们提出了简单的决策规则,将偏好与干预相匹配。方法。将9个属性分为二分类级别。参与者选择每个属性的首选级别,并使用最佳最差缩放对属性进行排名。确定了属性间偏好和属性内偏好,以及它们的异质性。使用决策规则,为假设的干预计算匹配分数。结果。67名乳腺癌幸存者完成了这项调查。他们的平均年龄为52岁,诊断后4.5岁,在3个维度(身体、精神和情感)上经历了CRF(6.5-7.2/10), 43%的人已经接受了CRF干预。总体而言,参与者将成本排在首位。除了成本之外,经证实的有效性和干预措施类型也经常排在第一位。只有13名参与者(19%)分享了最常见的偏好模式,即较短的干预、每日治疗、较短的治疗时间、心理社会干预、不匿名、与治疗师和同伴联系。与总体属性内偏好相对应的假设干预的属性匹配得分从44%到100%不等。结论。研究表明,乳腺癌幸存者对CRF干预属性的偏好存在很大的异质性。使用简单的决策规则,证明了这种异质性对将偏好与匹配分数的干预联系起来的影响。的影响。由于偏好异质性,个性化干预建议是必要的。量身定制的建议可以提高患者对决策的参与度,干预依从性和满意度,从而提高乳腺癌后的生活质量。重点:许多乳腺癌幸存者经历与癌症相关的疲劳,目前存在许多干预措施。我们的研究结果显示,乳腺癌患者对电子健康干预属性的偏好存在很大的异质性。基于这种偏好异质性,乳腺癌后癌症相关疲劳的干预建议可以个性化,最终提高乳腺癌后的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
MDM Policy and Practice
MDM Policy and Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prioritizing Patients from the Most Deprived Areas on Elective Waiting Lists in the NHS in England: Estimating the Health and Health Inequality Impact. Optimizing Masks and Random Screening Test Usage within K-12 Schools. Associations of Concordant and Shared Lung Cancer Screening Decision Making with Decisional Conflict: A Multi-Institution Cross-Sectional Analysis. Implications of Diminishing Lifespan Marginal Utility for Valuing Equity in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Evaluation of the Soda Tax on Obesity and Diabetes in California: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1