Advance care planning readiness, barriers, and facilitators among seriously ill Black older adults and their surrogates: A mixed methods study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Palliative & Supportive Care Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1017/S1478951524001548
Rebecca Howe, Shreya Kumar, Laura Slattery, Stephanie Milton, Orly Tonkikh, Everlyne G Ogugu, Julie T Bidwell, Janice Bell, Grace Amadi, Alicia Agnoli
{"title":"Advance care planning readiness, barriers, and facilitators among seriously ill Black older adults and their surrogates: A mixed methods study.","authors":"Rebecca Howe, Shreya Kumar, Laura Slattery, Stephanie Milton, Orly Tonkikh, Everlyne G Ogugu, Julie T Bidwell, Janice Bell, Grace Amadi, Alicia Agnoli","doi":"10.1017/S1478951524001548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Advance care planning (ACP) supports communication and medical decision-making and is best conceptualized as part of the care planning continuum. Black older adults have lower ACP engagement and poorer quality of care in serious illness. Surrogates are essential to effective ACP but are rarely integrated in care planning. Our objective was to describe readiness, barriers, and facilitators of ACP among seriously ill Black older adults and their surrogates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an explanatory sequential mixed methods study design. The setting was 2 ambulatory specialty clinics of an academic medical center and 1 community church in Northern California, USA. Participants included older adults and surrogates. Older adults were aged 60+, self-identified as Black, and had received care at 1 of the 2 clinics or were a member of the church congregation. Surrogates were aged 18+ and could potentially make medical decisions for the older adult. The validated ACP engagement survey was used to assess confidence and readiness for ACP. What \"matters most\" and barriers and facilitators to ACP employed questions from established ACP materials and trials. Semi-structured interviews were conducted after surveys to further explain survey results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Older adults (<i>N</i> = 30) and surrogates (<i>N</i> = 12) were confident that they could engage in ACP (4.1 and 4.7 out of 5), but many were not ready for these conversations (3.1 and 3.9 out of 5). A framework with 4 themes - illness experience, social connections, interaction with health providers, burden - supports identification of barriers and facilitators to ACP engagement.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>We identified barriers and facilitators and present a framework to support ACP engagement. Future research can assess the impact of this framework on communication and decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"e15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951524001548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Advance care planning (ACP) supports communication and medical decision-making and is best conceptualized as part of the care planning continuum. Black older adults have lower ACP engagement and poorer quality of care in serious illness. Surrogates are essential to effective ACP but are rarely integrated in care planning. Our objective was to describe readiness, barriers, and facilitators of ACP among seriously ill Black older adults and their surrogates.

Methods: We used an explanatory sequential mixed methods study design. The setting was 2 ambulatory specialty clinics of an academic medical center and 1 community church in Northern California, USA. Participants included older adults and surrogates. Older adults were aged 60+, self-identified as Black, and had received care at 1 of the 2 clinics or were a member of the church congregation. Surrogates were aged 18+ and could potentially make medical decisions for the older adult. The validated ACP engagement survey was used to assess confidence and readiness for ACP. What "matters most" and barriers and facilitators to ACP employed questions from established ACP materials and trials. Semi-structured interviews were conducted after surveys to further explain survey results.

Results: Older adults (N = 30) and surrogates (N = 12) were confident that they could engage in ACP (4.1 and 4.7 out of 5), but many were not ready for these conversations (3.1 and 3.9 out of 5). A framework with 4 themes - illness experience, social connections, interaction with health providers, burden - supports identification of barriers and facilitators to ACP engagement.

Significance of results: We identified barriers and facilitators and present a framework to support ACP engagement. Future research can assess the impact of this framework on communication and decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重病黑人老年人及其替代者的预先护理计划准备、障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法研究。
目标:预先护理计划 (ACP) 支持沟通和医疗决策,最好将其概念化为护理计划连续性的一部分。黑人老年人参与预先护理计划的比例较低,重病护理质量也较差。代理对于有效的 ACP 至关重要,但很少被纳入护理规划。我们的目标是描述身患重病的黑人老年人及其代治者的 ACP 准备情况、障碍和促进因素:我们采用了解释性顺序混合方法研究设计。研究地点为美国北加州一家学术医疗中心的两个门诊专科诊所和一个社区教堂。参与者包括老年人和代理人。老年人的年龄在 60 岁以上,自我认同为黑人,曾在这两家诊所中的一家接受过治疗,或者是教会成员。代理人年龄在 18 岁以上,有可能为老年人做出医疗决定。经过验证的 ACP 参与度调查用于评估对 ACP 的信心和准备程度。什么是 "最重要的 "以及 ACP 的障碍和促进因素采用了 ACP 既定资料和试验中的问题。调查后进行了半结构式访谈,以进一步解释调查结果:结果:老年人(30 人)和代理人(12 人)对参与 ACP 有信心(4.1 分和 4.7 分,满分为 5 分),但许多人尚未准备好进行这些对话(3.1 分和 3.9 分,满分为 5 分)。一个包含 4 个主题(疾病经历、社会关系、与医疗服务提供者的互动、负担)的框架有助于确定参与 ACP 的障碍和促进因素:结果的意义:我们确定了参与 ACP 的障碍和促进因素,并提出了一个支持参与 ACP 的框架。未来的研究可以评估该框架对沟通和决策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
期刊最新文献
Promising results of a resource- and activity-oriented intervention integrating rehabilitation into palliative care in people with advanced cancer: A feasibility study testing outcome measures. Sharing "off-script": A qualitative analysis of providers' empathic self-disclosures during dignity therapy. Evaluating the acceptability of a self-directed, self-management intervention for patients and caregivers facing advanced cancer. Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for advance care planning in older people: A COSMIN systematic review. Emotional ecosystems: Understanding the relationship between family interactions and anxiety among cancer caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1