Autonomy support in prenatal consultation: A quantitative observation study in maternity care.

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING European Journal of Midwifery Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18332/ejm/197053
Joyce Kors, Linda Martin, Corine J Verhoeven, Jens Henrichs, Saskia M Peerdeman, Rashmi A Kusurkar
{"title":"Autonomy support in prenatal consultation: A quantitative observation study in maternity care.","authors":"Joyce Kors, Linda Martin, Corine J Verhoeven, Jens Henrichs, Saskia M Peerdeman, Rashmi A Kusurkar","doi":"10.18332/ejm/197053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Maternity care professionals need to guide women through an increasing number of decision-making processes during pregnancy. Professionals tend to focus more on providing information than on decision support. According to the self-determination theory (SDT), professionals could help women make their own choices by fulfilling their three basic psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness through autonomy-supportive interactions. This study aimed to quantify autonomy-supportive and autonomy-thwarting interactions that professionals use during prenatal consultations and their association with women's perceptions of the healthcare climate during consultations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative observation study with a cross-sectional design was conducted in the Netherlands from March to October 2020. Twenty-three maternity care professionals in 2 hospitals and 16 midwifery practices were purposefully sampled. During 104 prenatal consultations, professional interactions were audiotaped and coded using the Coding and Observing Need-Supportive Consultation in Maternity Care Consultations. The woman's perceived healthcare climate was assessed using the Healthcare Climate Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed that professionals derive their autonomy-supportive interactions from a small repertoire. They tend to use more autonomy-supportive interactions (mean=2.31, SD=0.58) that give room to the woman than interactions that stimulate active engagement (mean=1.41, SD=0.80). During structuring interactions, they tend to use more informative (mean=1.81, SD=0.59) than supportive interactions (mean=0.94, SD=0.55). Women generally perceived the healthcare climate as positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women were rarely stimulated to be actively engaged in the consultations, while active woman engagement is vital in offering women-centered decision-making support. Professionals could improve their autonomy-supportive consultation climate by paying explicit attention to interactions involving women and offering structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":32920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Midwifery","volume":"9 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/197053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Maternity care professionals need to guide women through an increasing number of decision-making processes during pregnancy. Professionals tend to focus more on providing information than on decision support. According to the self-determination theory (SDT), professionals could help women make their own choices by fulfilling their three basic psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness through autonomy-supportive interactions. This study aimed to quantify autonomy-supportive and autonomy-thwarting interactions that professionals use during prenatal consultations and their association with women's perceptions of the healthcare climate during consultations.

Methods: A quantitative observation study with a cross-sectional design was conducted in the Netherlands from March to October 2020. Twenty-three maternity care professionals in 2 hospitals and 16 midwifery practices were purposefully sampled. During 104 prenatal consultations, professional interactions were audiotaped and coded using the Coding and Observing Need-Supportive Consultation in Maternity Care Consultations. The woman's perceived healthcare climate was assessed using the Healthcare Climate Questionnaire.

Results: We observed that professionals derive their autonomy-supportive interactions from a small repertoire. They tend to use more autonomy-supportive interactions (mean=2.31, SD=0.58) that give room to the woman than interactions that stimulate active engagement (mean=1.41, SD=0.80). During structuring interactions, they tend to use more informative (mean=1.81, SD=0.59) than supportive interactions (mean=0.94, SD=0.55). Women generally perceived the healthcare climate as positive.

Conclusions: Women were rarely stimulated to be actively engaged in the consultations, while active woman engagement is vital in offering women-centered decision-making support. Professionals could improve their autonomy-supportive consultation climate by paying explicit attention to interactions involving women and offering structure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自主支持产前咨询:在产妇护理定量观察研究。
导言:产科护理专业人员需要指导妇女通过怀孕期间越来越多的决策过程。专业人士往往更注重提供信息而不是决策支持。根据自我决定理论(SDT),专业人员可以通过自主支持互动来满足女性的三个基本心理需求:自主性、能力和相关性,从而帮助女性做出自己的选择。本研究旨在量化自主支持和自主阻碍的相互作用,专业人员使用在产前咨询和他们的关联与妇女在咨询期间的医疗保健气候的看法。方法:采用横断面设计,于2020年3月至10月在荷兰进行定量观察研究。有目的地抽样了2家医院和16家助产诊所的23名产科护理专业人员。在104次产前咨询中,专业互动被录音,并使用编码和观察产妇护理咨询中的需求支持咨询进行编码。使用卫生保健气候问卷评估女性感知的卫生保健气候。结果:我们观察到专业人员从一个小的曲目中获得自主支持的互动。他们倾向于使用更多的自主支持互动(平均=2.31,SD=0.58)给女性空间,而不是刺激主动参与的互动(平均=1.41,SD=0.80)。在结构化互动中,他们倾向于使用更多的信息(平均=1.81,SD=0.59),而不是支持性互动(平均=0.94,SD=0.55)。妇女普遍认为保健环境是积极的。结论:很少鼓励妇女积极参与协商,而积极的妇女参与对于提供以妇女为中心的决策支持至关重要。专业人员可以通过明确关注涉及妇女的互动和提供结构来改善自主支持的咨询氛围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Midwifery
European Journal of Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ukrainian refugee women's experience with maternity care in Norway: A qualitative study. The lived experiences of newly qualified midwives in supporting women during labor and birth: A hermeneutic phenomenological study in Malta. A two-wave survey study examining the impact of different sources of pregnancy information on pregnancy-related anxiety among Swedish women. Erratum: The role of continuity of care in high-risk pregnant women in Indonesia. Erratum: What midwives should know about fertility awareness and its impact on reproductive behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1