Famished for Freedom: Pellagra and Medical Clemency at the Mississippi State Penitentiary.

IF 0.9 3区 哲学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1093/jhmas/jrae048
Dana Landress
{"title":"Famished for Freedom: Pellagra and Medical Clemency at the Mississippi State Penitentiary.","authors":"Dana Landress","doi":"10.1093/jhmas/jrae048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper provides a case study of one medical experiment conducted in 1915 by the United States Public Health Service in collaboration with the Mississippi State Penitentiary. The experiment was non-therapeutic and its objective was to induce pellagra (a vitamin deficiency disease) in twelve healthy White male prisoners to confirm its etiology. Extant archival records produced by the convict participants, state politicians, and health researchers underscore that the men selected for the pellagra experiment were unique among incarcerated people in Mississippi at the time: they were White, wealthy, and politically well-connected. This paper contends that the convict participants leveraged a wide range of social and political connections to secure their participation in the pellagra experiment as an expeditious pathway to pre-arranged executive pardon, a phenomenon that I term medical clemency. By situating the 1915 pellagra prison experiment amid the broader landscape of incarceration, public health research, and systems of political patronage in Mississippi, this paper highlights the ways in which penal systems are embedded in broader social and political contexts. Not only did the experiment exacerbate pre-existing social inequalities behind bars, it also had lasting consequences for those involved in prison medical research - namely, the power to determine which kinds of convicts could ultimately re-enter the social order.</p>","PeriodicalId":49998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrae048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper provides a case study of one medical experiment conducted in 1915 by the United States Public Health Service in collaboration with the Mississippi State Penitentiary. The experiment was non-therapeutic and its objective was to induce pellagra (a vitamin deficiency disease) in twelve healthy White male prisoners to confirm its etiology. Extant archival records produced by the convict participants, state politicians, and health researchers underscore that the men selected for the pellagra experiment were unique among incarcerated people in Mississippi at the time: they were White, wealthy, and politically well-connected. This paper contends that the convict participants leveraged a wide range of social and political connections to secure their participation in the pellagra experiment as an expeditious pathway to pre-arranged executive pardon, a phenomenon that I term medical clemency. By situating the 1915 pellagra prison experiment amid the broader landscape of incarceration, public health research, and systems of political patronage in Mississippi, this paper highlights the ways in which penal systems are embedded in broader social and political contexts. Not only did the experiment exacerbate pre-existing social inequalities behind bars, it also had lasting consequences for those involved in prison medical research - namely, the power to determine which kinds of convicts could ultimately re-enter the social order.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
渴求自由:密西西比州立监狱的糙皮病和医疗赦免。
本文对 1915 年美国公共卫生局与密西西比州立监狱合作开展的一项医学实验进行了案例研究。该实验是非治疗性的,其目的是诱导 12 名健康的白人男性囚犯患上糙皮病(一种维生素缺乏症),以确认其病因。由囚犯参与者、州政客和健康研究人员提供的现存档案记录强调,被选中进行糙皮病实验的人在当时密西西比州的被监禁者中是独一无二的:他们是白人、富人和政治上的熟人。本文认为,罪犯参与者利用广泛的社会和政治关系确保他们参与黄疽病实验,以此作为获得预先安排的行政赦免的捷径,我将这种现象称为医疗宽恕。通过将 1915 年的糙皮病监狱实验置于密西西比州的监禁、公共卫生研究和政治庇护制度等更广泛的背景中,本文强调了刑事制度嵌入更广泛的社会和政治背景的方式。该实验不仅加剧了铁窗中原已存在的社会不平等,还对参与监狱医学研究的人员产生了持久的影响--即决定哪类罪犯最终可以重新进入社会秩序的权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences
Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Started in 1946, the Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences is internationally recognized as one of the top publications in its field. The journal''s coverage is broad, publishing the latest original research on the written beginnings of medicine in all its aspects. When possible and appropriate, it focuses on what practitioners of the healing arts did or taught, and how their peers, as well as patients, received and interpreted their efforts. Subscribers include clinicians and hospital libraries, as well as academic and public historians.
期刊最新文献
Collective Forgetting of American Vaginal Breech Delivery. Famished for Freedom: Pellagra and Medical Clemency at the Mississippi State Penitentiary. Treating Opium Addiction in China: Medical Missionaries, Chinese Medicine, and the State, 1830-1910. Gerbils without Borders: Invasiveness, Plague, and Micro-Global Histories of Science, 1932-1939. What Evidence for a Cholera Vaccine? Jaime Ferrán's Submissions to the Prix Bréant.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1