{"title":"Bacteriophage-based live bacteria detection for rapid infection diagnosis.","authors":"Merve Calimci, Tugba Tezcan, Emine Kubra Tayyarcan, Kubra Guven, Ismail Hakki Boyaci, Ugur Tamer","doi":"10.1016/j.talanta.2025.127569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bacterial bloodstream infections cause high morbidity and mortality. Although bacteria can be detected by various methods, culture methods are often used for the detection of live, accurate, reproducible, and selective bacterial identification. However, the culture method is time-consuming, and clinicians often start treatment immediately due to the long determination time. This reduces the bacterial density detectable by culture, and in some cases, makes determination difficult. To overcome this challenge, we propose a method that directly combines bacteriophage-based lysis with quantitative PCR (qPCR). This method enables the simple and rapid detection of bacteria without the need for pre-concentration or DNA extraction steps. Escherichia coli K12 (E. coli K12) was used as the model bacterium, and bacteria lysed by the E. coli K12-specific bacteriophage were detected using qPCR. The total analysis time was less than 3 h, and only live bacterial cells were selectively lysed. The method was also used to detect bacteria spiked into reference plasma samples, and bacterial DNA was detected via qPCR. The results obtained from the calibration graph created with cultured bacteria and the one created by spiking bacteria into reference plasma were consistent. The similarities between the calibration graphs from both methods were found to be in the range of 92-102.7 %. The LOD and LOQ values for bacteria spiked into reference plasma were calculated as 14.80 and 3.5x10³ CFU/mL, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":435,"journal":{"name":"Talanta","volume":"286 ","pages":"127569"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Talanta","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2025.127569","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bacterial bloodstream infections cause high morbidity and mortality. Although bacteria can be detected by various methods, culture methods are often used for the detection of live, accurate, reproducible, and selective bacterial identification. However, the culture method is time-consuming, and clinicians often start treatment immediately due to the long determination time. This reduces the bacterial density detectable by culture, and in some cases, makes determination difficult. To overcome this challenge, we propose a method that directly combines bacteriophage-based lysis with quantitative PCR (qPCR). This method enables the simple and rapid detection of bacteria without the need for pre-concentration or DNA extraction steps. Escherichia coli K12 (E. coli K12) was used as the model bacterium, and bacteria lysed by the E. coli K12-specific bacteriophage were detected using qPCR. The total analysis time was less than 3 h, and only live bacterial cells were selectively lysed. The method was also used to detect bacteria spiked into reference plasma samples, and bacterial DNA was detected via qPCR. The results obtained from the calibration graph created with cultured bacteria and the one created by spiking bacteria into reference plasma were consistent. The similarities between the calibration graphs from both methods were found to be in the range of 92-102.7 %. The LOD and LOQ values for bacteria spiked into reference plasma were calculated as 14.80 and 3.5x10³ CFU/mL, respectively.
期刊介绍:
Talanta provides a forum for the publication of original research papers, short communications, and critical reviews in all branches of pure and applied analytical chemistry. Papers are evaluated based on established guidelines, including the fundamental nature of the study, scientific novelty, substantial improvement or advantage over existing technology or methods, and demonstrated analytical applicability. Original research papers on fundamental studies, and on novel sensor and instrumentation developments, are encouraged. Novel or improved applications in areas such as clinical and biological chemistry, environmental analysis, geochemistry, materials science and engineering, and analytical platforms for omics development are welcome.
Analytical performance of methods should be determined, including interference and matrix effects, and methods should be validated by comparison with a standard method, or analysis of a certified reference material. Simple spiking recoveries may not be sufficient. The developed method should especially comprise information on selectivity, sensitivity, detection limits, accuracy, and reliability. However, applying official validation or robustness studies to a routine method or technique does not necessarily constitute novelty. Proper statistical treatment of the data should be provided. Relevant literature should be cited, including related publications by the authors, and authors should discuss how their proposed methodology compares with previously reported methods.