Assessment of using transfer learning with different classifiers in hypodontia diagnosis.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BMC Oral Health Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1186/s12903-025-05451-2
Tansel Uyar, Didem Sakaryalı Uyar
{"title":"Assessment of using transfer learning with different classifiers in hypodontia diagnosis.","authors":"Tansel Uyar, Didem Sakaryalı Uyar","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-05451-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypodontia is the absence of one or more teeth in the primary or permanent dentition during development, and radiographic imaging is the most common method of diagnosis. However, in recent years, artificial intelligence-based decision support systems have been employed to make highly accurate diagnoses. The aim of this study was to classify single premolar agenesis, multiple premolar agenesis, and without tooth agenesis using various artificial intelligence approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One thousand sixty-eight panoramic radiographs from pediatric patients aged between 6 and 12 years without systemic disease were sorted into three separate classes: single premolar agenesis (n = 336), multiple premolar agenesis (n = 324), and without tooth agenesis (n = 408). Pretrained convolutional neural network models (AlexNet, DarkNet-19, DarkNet-53, DenseNet-201, EfficientNet, GoogLeNet, InceptionV3, IncResV2, MobileNetV2, NasNet-Mobile, Places365, ResNet-18, ResNet-50, ResNet-101, ShuffleNet, SqueezeNet, VGG-16, VGG-19, and Xception) were used for training with the fine-tuning method and different machine learning classifiers (decision trees, discriminant analysis, logistic regression, naive Bayes, support vector machines, nearest neighbor, ensemble method, and artificial neural network). The dataset was divided into 80% for training and 20% for testing. Performance was evaluated via accuracy, recall, precision, F1-score, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All of the data were classified via a VGG-19 model with a bilayered neural network classifier, which achieved 95.63% accuracy, 93.26% precision, 93.34% recall, 96.73% specificity, 93.25% F1-score and 95.03% AUC and was identified as the most successful model. The accuracy values for this model were distributed as follows: 96.72% for without tooth agenesis, 95.79% for multiple premolar agenesis, and 94.39% for single premolar agenesis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful results of pretrained models have been demonstrated for the radiographic diagnosis of hypodontia in pediatric patients. It is expected that artificial intelligence approaches will facilitate the diagnosis of hypodontia.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734474/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05451-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hypodontia is the absence of one or more teeth in the primary or permanent dentition during development, and radiographic imaging is the most common method of diagnosis. However, in recent years, artificial intelligence-based decision support systems have been employed to make highly accurate diagnoses. The aim of this study was to classify single premolar agenesis, multiple premolar agenesis, and without tooth agenesis using various artificial intelligence approaches.

Methods: One thousand sixty-eight panoramic radiographs from pediatric patients aged between 6 and 12 years without systemic disease were sorted into three separate classes: single premolar agenesis (n = 336), multiple premolar agenesis (n = 324), and without tooth agenesis (n = 408). Pretrained convolutional neural network models (AlexNet, DarkNet-19, DarkNet-53, DenseNet-201, EfficientNet, GoogLeNet, InceptionV3, IncResV2, MobileNetV2, NasNet-Mobile, Places365, ResNet-18, ResNet-50, ResNet-101, ShuffleNet, SqueezeNet, VGG-16, VGG-19, and Xception) were used for training with the fine-tuning method and different machine learning classifiers (decision trees, discriminant analysis, logistic regression, naive Bayes, support vector machines, nearest neighbor, ensemble method, and artificial neural network). The dataset was divided into 80% for training and 20% for testing. Performance was evaluated via accuracy, recall, precision, F1-score, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) parameters.

Results: All of the data were classified via a VGG-19 model with a bilayered neural network classifier, which achieved 95.63% accuracy, 93.26% precision, 93.34% recall, 96.73% specificity, 93.25% F1-score and 95.03% AUC and was identified as the most successful model. The accuracy values for this model were distributed as follows: 96.72% for without tooth agenesis, 95.79% for multiple premolar agenesis, and 94.39% for single premolar agenesis.

Conclusions: Successful results of pretrained models have been demonstrated for the radiographic diagnosis of hypodontia in pediatric patients. It is expected that artificial intelligence approaches will facilitate the diagnosis of hypodontia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同分类器在下颌畸形诊断中的迁移学习评价。
背景:牙缺症是指在发育过程中乳牙或恒牙缺一颗或多颗牙齿,影像学是最常用的诊断方法。然而,近年来,基于人工智能的决策支持系统已被用于进行高度准确的诊断。本研究的目的是利用各种人工智能方法对单前磨牙发育不良、多前磨牙发育不良和无牙齿发育不良进行分类。方法:对6 ~ 12岁无全身性疾病儿童的全景x线片168张进行分类,分为单前磨牙发育不全(336张)、多前磨牙发育不全(324张)和无牙齿发育不全(408张)3类。使用预训练的卷积神经网络模型(AlexNet、DarkNet-19、DarkNet-53、DenseNet-201、EfficientNet、GoogLeNet、InceptionV3、IncResV2、MobileNetV2、NasNet-Mobile、Places365、ResNet-18、ResNet-50、ResNet-101、ShuffleNet、SqueezeNet、VGG-16、VGG-19和Xception)进行训练,使用微调方法和不同的机器学习分类器(决策树、判别分析、逻辑回归、朴素贝叶斯、支持向量机、最近邻、集成方法、和人工神经网络)。数据集分为80%用于训练,20%用于测试。通过准确性、召回率、精密度、f1评分、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)参数评估其性能。结果:采用双层神经网络分类器对VGG-19模型进行分类,准确率为95.63%,精密度为93.26%,召回率为93.34%,特异性为96.73%,f1评分为93.25%,AUC为95.03%,是最成功的模型。该模型无牙发育的准确率为96.72%,多前磨牙发育的准确率为95.79%,单前磨牙发育的准确率为94.39%。结论:预训练模型的成功结果已被证明用于儿科患者下颌畸形的影像学诊断。预计人工智能方法将有助于下颌畸形的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
DEEP LEARNING APPROACH BASED ON TRANSFER LEARNING WITH DIFFERENT CLASSIFIERS FOR ECG DIAGNOSIS
IF 0 International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Information SciencesPub Date : 2022-04-27 DOI: 10.21608/ijicis.2022.105574.1137
M. Bassiouni, I. Hegazy, N. Rizk, E. El-Dahshan, A. Salem
Detection of explosives in dustbins using deep transfer learning based multiclass classifiers
IF 5.3 2区 计算机科学Applied IntelligencePub Date : 2024-02-02 DOI: 10.1007/s10489-023-05249-1
Amoakoh Gyasi-Agyei
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of phase 4 clinical trials on Dental Caries registered at Clinicaltrials.gov. Does reducing the acid-etching time increase the micro-tensile bond strength of a bulk fill composite to dentin using different universal adhesives? The association of third molars with mandibular incisor crowding in a group of the Yemeni population in Sana'a city: cone-beam computed tomography. Influence of alloplastic materials, biologics, and their combinations, along with defect characteristics, on short-term intrabony defect surgical treatment outcomes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Association between the indicators of insulin resistance and periodontitis: a study using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009-2014.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1