Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study: Methods and Impact on the Use of Corneas From Donors With Diabetes for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.
Marianne O Price, Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn, Colleen E Bauza, Zachariah W Reed, Beth Ann Benetz, Mark A Greiner, David D Verdier, Mark C Soper, Michael S Titus, Vincent M Monnier, Baha M Arafah, Craig Kollman, Roy W Beck, Jonathan H Lass
{"title":"Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study: Methods and Impact on the Use of Corneas From Donors With Diabetes for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.","authors":"Marianne O Price, Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn, Colleen E Bauza, Zachariah W Reed, Beth Ann Benetz, Mark A Greiner, David D Verdier, Mark C Soper, Michael S Titus, Vincent M Monnier, Baha M Arafah, Craig Kollman, Roy W Beck, Jonathan H Lass","doi":"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Describe aims, methods, characteristics of donors, donor corneas and recipients, and potential impact of the Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study (DEKS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The DEKS is a randomized, clinical trial to assess graft success and endothelial cell density (ECD) 1 year after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) using corneas from donors with versus without diabetes in a 1:2 minimization assignment. Diabetes severity in the donor is assessed by medical history, postmortem HbA1c, and donor skin advanced glycation end-products and oxidation markers. A central image analysis reading center assesses baseline donor, 1-month and 1-year postoperative ECD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DEKS used corneas from 1154 donors for 1421 DMEK procedures on 1097 participants (324 bilateral) at 28 clinical sites. Forty-eight tissue preparations failed (3%). Mean donor age was 65 years; mean eye bank-determined screening ECD was 2709 cells/mm2. Ultimately, 106 (9%) of 1154 donors without diabetes history were classified as diabetic based on postmortem HbA1c ≥6.5%, and 509 (36%) of 1421 donor lenticules were classified as coming from diabetic donors. Recipients were 58% female, 96% White, and 53% phakic. Study eyes were treated for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (96%), pseudophakic corneal edema (2%), and failed endothelial keratoplasty (2%). Mean recipient age was 70 years; 21% had diabetes history and 26 (2%) had central laboratory determined HbA1c ≥6.5% without diabetes history.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DEKS will increase understanding of factors related to DMEK success while determining whether diabetes and/or diabetes severity in the donor and/or recipient adversely affects graft success and endothelial cell loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":10710,"journal":{"name":"Cornea","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornea","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003776","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Describe aims, methods, characteristics of donors, donor corneas and recipients, and potential impact of the Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study (DEKS).
Methods: The DEKS is a randomized, clinical trial to assess graft success and endothelial cell density (ECD) 1 year after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) using corneas from donors with versus without diabetes in a 1:2 minimization assignment. Diabetes severity in the donor is assessed by medical history, postmortem HbA1c, and donor skin advanced glycation end-products and oxidation markers. A central image analysis reading center assesses baseline donor, 1-month and 1-year postoperative ECD.
Results: The DEKS used corneas from 1154 donors for 1421 DMEK procedures on 1097 participants (324 bilateral) at 28 clinical sites. Forty-eight tissue preparations failed (3%). Mean donor age was 65 years; mean eye bank-determined screening ECD was 2709 cells/mm2. Ultimately, 106 (9%) of 1154 donors without diabetes history were classified as diabetic based on postmortem HbA1c ≥6.5%, and 509 (36%) of 1421 donor lenticules were classified as coming from diabetic donors. Recipients were 58% female, 96% White, and 53% phakic. Study eyes were treated for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (96%), pseudophakic corneal edema (2%), and failed endothelial keratoplasty (2%). Mean recipient age was 70 years; 21% had diabetes history and 26 (2%) had central laboratory determined HbA1c ≥6.5% without diabetes history.
Conclusions: The DEKS will increase understanding of factors related to DMEK success while determining whether diabetes and/or diabetes severity in the donor and/or recipient adversely affects graft success and endothelial cell loss.
期刊介绍:
For corneal specialists and for all general ophthalmologists with an interest in this exciting subspecialty, Cornea brings together the latest clinical and basic research on the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye. Each volume is peer-reviewed by Cornea''s board of world-renowned experts and fully indexed in archival format. Your subscription brings you the latest developments in your field and a growing library of valuable professional references.
Sponsored by The Cornea Society which was founded as the Castroviejo Cornea Society in 1975.