Conceptualization of pain in Croatian adults: a cross-sectional and psychometric study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Croatian Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-30
Snježana Schuster, Iva Lončarić Kelečić, Morana Bilić, Margareta Begić, Joshua W Pate
{"title":"Conceptualization of pain in Croatian adults: a cross-sectional and psychometric study.","authors":"Snježana Schuster, Iva Lončarić Kelečić, Morana Bilić, Margareta Begić, Joshua W Pate","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To ascertain whether Croatian respondents' knowledge on pain aligns with modern pain science, and determine the measurement properties of the Croatian version of the Concept of Pain Inventory for Adults (COPI-Adult).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, online survey was used to collect the respondents' sociodemographic, clinical, and COPI-Adult (CRO) data (n = 509). A Pearson correlation coefficient test was used to assess the correlations between sociodemographic, clinical, and COPI-Adult (CRO) data. Confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach's coefficient, based on classical test theory, were used to determine the measurement properties of the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average COPI-Adult (CRO) score was 35.91 ± 5.8 out of 52 and it was similar in respondents with (36.52±6.01) and without (35.36±5.57) formal medical/health care education. Respondents exhibited a reductionist understanding of pain as a result of structural damage. Higher COPI-Adult scores were very weakly correlated with formal medical/health care education, younger age, lower pain intensity, higher pain knowledge self-assessment, and higher education level. Formal medical education significantly moderately correlated with pain knowledge self-assessment (r=-0.425; P<0.001). One-factor COPI-Adult (CRO) model revealed significant factor loadings of each item (P<0.001) and good internal consistency (Cronbach α=0.803).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Croatian respondents' concept of pain aligns with their objective knowledge, but only partially with modern pain science. This indicates the need to bridge the gap between traditional and contemporary understandings of pain in the Croatian population. One-factor COPI-Adult (CRO) inventory serves as the first questionnaire for assessing the concept of pain among Croatian adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":10796,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Medical Journal","volume":"65 6","pages":"473-482"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To ascertain whether Croatian respondents' knowledge on pain aligns with modern pain science, and determine the measurement properties of the Croatian version of the Concept of Pain Inventory for Adults (COPI-Adult).

Methods: A cross-sectional, online survey was used to collect the respondents' sociodemographic, clinical, and COPI-Adult (CRO) data (n = 509). A Pearson correlation coefficient test was used to assess the correlations between sociodemographic, clinical, and COPI-Adult (CRO) data. Confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach's coefficient, based on classical test theory, were used to determine the measurement properties of the questionnaire.

Results: The average COPI-Adult (CRO) score was 35.91 ± 5.8 out of 52 and it was similar in respondents with (36.52±6.01) and without (35.36±5.57) formal medical/health care education. Respondents exhibited a reductionist understanding of pain as a result of structural damage. Higher COPI-Adult scores were very weakly correlated with formal medical/health care education, younger age, lower pain intensity, higher pain knowledge self-assessment, and higher education level. Formal medical education significantly moderately correlated with pain knowledge self-assessment (r=-0.425; P<0.001). One-factor COPI-Adult (CRO) model revealed significant factor loadings of each item (P<0.001) and good internal consistency (Cronbach α=0.803).

Conclusions: Croatian respondents' concept of pain aligns with their objective knowledge, but only partially with modern pain science. This indicates the need to bridge the gap between traditional and contemporary understandings of pain in the Croatian population. One-factor COPI-Adult (CRO) inventory serves as the first questionnaire for assessing the concept of pain among Croatian adults.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Croatian Medical Journal
Croatian Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Croatian Medical Journal (CMJ) is an international peer reviewed journal open to scientists from all fields of biomedicine and health related research. Although CMJ welcomes all contributions that increase and expand on medical knowledge, the two areas are of the special interest: topics globally relevant for biomedicine and health and medicine in developing and emerging countries.
期刊最新文献
Conceptualization of pain in Croatian adults: a cross-sectional and psychometric study. Control values of intraocular pressure in different species: a review of literature. Alcohol use among Croatian adolescents: the alignment of 13-year-old and 15-year-old girls with boys, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Behavioral correlates of health literacy among university students of health sciences in Kosovo: a cross-sectional study. Editors' role in shaping the publishing environment and guiding authors in the era of artificial intelligence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1