Clinical improvements after endoscopic lung volume reduction with valves in patients with advanced emphysema and a 6-min walk test ≤140 m at baseline.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1183/23120541.00410-2024
Jacopo Saccomanno, Lara Kilic, Thomas Sgarbossa, Konrad Neumann, Franz Stanzel, Angelique Holland, Christian Grah, Wolfgang Gesierich, Joanna Krist, Joachim H Ficker, Stephan Eggeling, Stefan Andreas, Bernd Schmidt, Stephan Eisenmann, Björn Schwick, Karl-Josef Franke, Andreas Fertl, Martin Witzenrath, Ralf-Harto Hübner
{"title":"Clinical improvements after endoscopic lung volume reduction with valves in patients with advanced emphysema and a 6-min walk test ≤140 m at baseline.","authors":"Jacopo Saccomanno, Lara Kilic, Thomas Sgarbossa, Konrad Neumann, Franz Stanzel, Angelique Holland, Christian Grah, Wolfgang Gesierich, Joanna Krist, Joachim H Ficker, Stephan Eggeling, Stefan Andreas, Bernd Schmidt, Stephan Eisenmann, Björn Schwick, Karl-Josef Franke, Andreas Fertl, Martin Witzenrath, Ralf-Harto Hübner","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00410-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data regarding the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic lung volume reduction with valves (ELVR) in emphysema patients with a very low 6-min walk test (6MWT) are limited. Patients with severe emphysema and very low exercise capacity, as indicated by a 6MWT ≤140 m, are often excluded from clinical studies on ELVR, assuming limited therapeutic benefits and increased complication risk.</p><p><strong>Study designs and methods: </strong>This study utilised data from the Lungenemphysemregister e.V., a large German national multi-centre prospective open-label clinical trial, and aimed to assess the outcomes of ELVR in patients with a baseline 6MWT ≤140 m and dyspnoea primarily attributed to hyperinflation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>54 patients with a baseline 6MWT ≤140 m and 365 patients with a baseline 6MWT between 140 and 450 m were included in the study. Baseline characteristics were representative for patients with advanced lung emphysema. Patients with a 6MWT ≤140 m at baseline had a lower forced expiratory volume in 1 s and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide and higher symptom burden. In the 3-month follow-up, patients of both groups showed statistically significant improvements in lung function parameters, exercise capacity and quality of life parameters compared to baseline. Patients with a 6MWT ≤140 m at baseline showed significantly more 6MWT improvement compared to patients with baseline 6MWT between 140 and 450 m. Moreover, complication rates were similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In summary, the data indicate that ELVR may be an effective and safe treatment for emphysema patients with a very low 6MWT of ≤140 m if very limited exercise capacity is predominately caused by lung emphysema. Therefore future studies should include emphysema patients with a very low 6MWT.</p>","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726540/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00410-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Data regarding the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic lung volume reduction with valves (ELVR) in emphysema patients with a very low 6-min walk test (6MWT) are limited. Patients with severe emphysema and very low exercise capacity, as indicated by a 6MWT ≤140 m, are often excluded from clinical studies on ELVR, assuming limited therapeutic benefits and increased complication risk.

Study designs and methods: This study utilised data from the Lungenemphysemregister e.V., a large German national multi-centre prospective open-label clinical trial, and aimed to assess the outcomes of ELVR in patients with a baseline 6MWT ≤140 m and dyspnoea primarily attributed to hyperinflation.

Results: 54 patients with a baseline 6MWT ≤140 m and 365 patients with a baseline 6MWT between 140 and 450 m were included in the study. Baseline characteristics were representative for patients with advanced lung emphysema. Patients with a 6MWT ≤140 m at baseline had a lower forced expiratory volume in 1 s and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide and higher symptom burden. In the 3-month follow-up, patients of both groups showed statistically significant improvements in lung function parameters, exercise capacity and quality of life parameters compared to baseline. Patients with a 6MWT ≤140 m at baseline showed significantly more 6MWT improvement compared to patients with baseline 6MWT between 140 and 450 m. Moreover, complication rates were similar in both groups.

Interpretation: In summary, the data indicate that ELVR may be an effective and safe treatment for emphysema patients with a very low 6MWT of ≤140 m if very limited exercise capacity is predominately caused by lung emphysema. Therefore future studies should include emphysema patients with a very low 6MWT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期肺气肿患者在基线≤140米的6分钟步行试验中经内窥镜肺减容后的临床改善
背景:对于具有极低6分钟步行测试(6MWT)的肺气肿患者,关于内镜下带瓣膜肺减容(ELVR)的有效性和安全性的数据有限。严重肺气肿和运动能力极低的患者,如6MWT≤140 m,通常被排除在ELVR的临床研究之外,认为治疗效果有限,并发症风险增加。研究设计和方法:本研究使用了来自Lungenemphysemregister e.V的数据,这是一项大型德国国家多中心前瞻性开放标签临床试验,旨在评估基线6MWT≤140 m且主要归因于恶性通货膨胀的呼吸困难患者ELVR的结果。结果:54例基线6MWT≤140 m的患者和365例基线6MWT在140 - 450 m之间的患者纳入研究。基线特征对晚期肺气肿患者具有代表性。基线时6MWT≤140 m的患者1s用力呼气量和肺对一氧化碳的弥散能力较低,症状负担较高。在3个月的随访中,两组患者的肺功能参数、运动能力和生活质量参数与基线相比均有统计学意义的改善。基线6MWT≤140 m的患者与基线6MWT在140 - 450 m之间的患者相比,6MWT的改善明显更多。此外,两组的并发症发生率相似。综上所述,数据表明,如果非常有限的运动能力主要是由肺气肿引起的,那么对于6MWT≤140 m的极低肺气肿患者,ELVR可能是一种有效且安全的治疗方法。因此,未来的研究应纳入6MWT极低的肺气肿患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
期刊最新文献
Epidemiology of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis: a descriptive study using a Japanese national administrative claims database. ERS Congress 2024: highlights from the Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Assembly. Long-term outcomes in five patients with autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis treated with molgramostim inhalation solution. Brensocatib in patients with bronchiectasis: subgroup analyses from the WILLOW trial. Chronobiology in breathlessness across 24 h in people with persistent breathlessness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1