Factors associated with true-positive and false-positive diagnoses of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia in 100 consecutive referrals from specialist physicians

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Journal of Neurology Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1111/ene.70036
Joshua Flavell, Emily G. M. Ahern, Benignus Logan, Thomas B. Shaw, Robert J. Adam, Caitlin A. T. McElligott, Peter J. Nestor
{"title":"Factors associated with true-positive and false-positive diagnoses of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia in 100 consecutive referrals from specialist physicians","authors":"Joshua Flavell,&nbsp;Emily G. M. Ahern,&nbsp;Benignus Logan,&nbsp;Thomas B. Shaw,&nbsp;Robert J. Adam,&nbsp;Caitlin A. T. McElligott,&nbsp;Peter J. Nestor","doi":"10.1111/ene.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is a challenging diagnosis due to overlapping symptoms with psychiatric and other neurological conditions. Accordingly, misdiagnosis is common. The present study aimed to identify clinical factors contributing to misdiagnoses of bvFTD by specialist physicians.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively analysed 100 consecutive referrals by specialist physicians (primarily psychiatrists, neurologists and geriatricians) to a tertiary cognitive disorders clinic specializing in frontotemporal lobar degenerative disorders. Patients were included if the referring specialist suspected bvFTD or if bvFTD was confirmed as the final diagnosis. Diagnostic factors were assessed by comparing the initial referral information with final clinical diagnoses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 100 patients, 34 were true-positive and 66 were false-positive for bvFTD. False-positive diagnoses were often based on misinterpretation of neuroimaging, particularly nuclear imaging (FDG-PET and HMPAO-SPECT), where subjective interpretation errors led to incorrect bvFTD diagnoses in 32 patients. Cognitive testing also contributed to misdiagnosis, with formal neuropsychological testing incorrectly leading to a bvFTD diagnosis in 20 patients. Patients with prior psychiatric histories were more likely to be misdiagnosed. Observable behavioural features of bvFTD and physical neurological signs were significantly more prevalent in true-positive patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Misinterpretation of neuroimaging and cognitive testing, in particular formal neuropsychological testing, significantly contributed to false-positive bvFTD diagnoses. Physicians should be cautious not to over-interpret neuroimaging and neuropsychology studies and be wary of patients with prior psychiatric histories. In contrast, greater weight should be placed on objective clinical observations of behavioural signs of bvFTD and the emergence of physical neurological signs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11954,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neurology","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ene.70036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is a challenging diagnosis due to overlapping symptoms with psychiatric and other neurological conditions. Accordingly, misdiagnosis is common. The present study aimed to identify clinical factors contributing to misdiagnoses of bvFTD by specialist physicians.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed 100 consecutive referrals by specialist physicians (primarily psychiatrists, neurologists and geriatricians) to a tertiary cognitive disorders clinic specializing in frontotemporal lobar degenerative disorders. Patients were included if the referring specialist suspected bvFTD or if bvFTD was confirmed as the final diagnosis. Diagnostic factors were assessed by comparing the initial referral information with final clinical diagnoses.

Results

Of the 100 patients, 34 were true-positive and 66 were false-positive for bvFTD. False-positive diagnoses were often based on misinterpretation of neuroimaging, particularly nuclear imaging (FDG-PET and HMPAO-SPECT), where subjective interpretation errors led to incorrect bvFTD diagnoses in 32 patients. Cognitive testing also contributed to misdiagnosis, with formal neuropsychological testing incorrectly leading to a bvFTD diagnosis in 20 patients. Patients with prior psychiatric histories were more likely to be misdiagnosed. Observable behavioural features of bvFTD and physical neurological signs were significantly more prevalent in true-positive patients.

Conclusions

Misinterpretation of neuroimaging and cognitive testing, in particular formal neuropsychological testing, significantly contributed to false-positive bvFTD diagnoses. Physicians should be cautious not to over-interpret neuroimaging and neuropsychology studies and be wary of patients with prior psychiatric histories. In contrast, greater weight should be placed on objective clinical observations of behavioural signs of bvFTD and the emergence of physical neurological signs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在100个连续转诊的专科医生中,与行为变异性额颞叶痴呆的真阳性和假阳性诊断相关的因素
背景:额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)的行为变异是一个具有挑战性的诊断,因为它的症状与精神和其他神经系统疾病重叠。因此,误诊是常见的。本研究旨在找出专科医生误诊bvFTD的临床因素。方法:我们回顾性分析了100名专科医生(主要是精神科医生、神经科医生和老年病医生)连续转诊到一家三级认知障碍诊所,专门治疗额颞叶退行性疾病。如果转诊专家怀疑bvFTD或bvFTD被确诊为最终诊断,则纳入患者。通过比较最初的转诊信息和最终的临床诊断来评估诊断因素。结果:100例患者中,bvFTD真阳性34例,假阳性66例。假阳性诊断通常基于对神经影像学的误解,特别是核影像学(FDG-PET和hpao - spect),其中主观解释错误导致32例患者的bvFTD诊断错误。认知测试也导致误诊,正式的神经心理学测试错误地导致20名患者被诊断为bvFTD。有精神病史的患者更容易被误诊。观察到的bvFTD行为特征和生理神经体征在真阳性患者中更为普遍。结论:对神经影像学和认知测试的误解,特别是正式的神经心理学测试,是导致bvFTD假阳性诊断的重要原因。医生应谨慎,不要过度解读神经影像学和神经心理学研究,并对有精神病史的患者保持警惕。相反,对于bvFTD的行为体征和生理神经体征的出现,应该更加重视客观的临床观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Neurology
European Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.00%
发文量
418
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Neurology is the official journal of the European Academy of Neurology and covers all areas of clinical and basic research in neurology, including pre-clinical research of immediate translational value for new potential treatments. Emphasis is placed on major diseases of large clinical and socio-economic importance (dementia, stroke, epilepsy, headache, multiple sclerosis, movement disorders, and infectious diseases).
期刊最新文献
Epilepsy Management in Transgender Population: More Research for Better Treatment Hippocampal Subfield Volume in Relation to Cerebrospinal Fluid Amyloid-ß in Early Alzheimer's Disease: Diagnostic Utility of 7T MRI Three-Objects-Three-Places Episodic Memory Test to Screen Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia: Validation in a Memory Clinic Population Bridging the Gaps: Addressing Inequities in Neurological Care for Underserved Populations MEPs and MRI Motor Band Sign as Potential Complementary Markers of Upper Motor Neuron Involvement in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1