Novel pain assessment tool specific for pulp symptoms to aid diagnosis.

IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International endodontic journal Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1111/iej.14195
Vipin Kumar, Sidhartha Sharma, Vijay Kumar, Amrita Chawla, Mani Kalaivani, Dalim Kumar Baidya, Phillip L Tomson, Paul V Abbott, Ajay Logani
{"title":"Novel pain assessment tool specific for pulp symptoms to aid diagnosis.","authors":"Vipin Kumar, Sidhartha Sharma, Vijay Kumar, Amrita Chawla, Mani Kalaivani, Dalim Kumar Baidya, Phillip L Tomson, Paul V Abbott, Ajay Logani","doi":"10.1111/iej.14195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Although many pain assessment tools exist, none are specific to the relatively unique presentation of pulpal pain. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a novel pain assessment tool based on pulp symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A preliminary list of items best-describing pulpitis was developed based on deductive and inductive approaches and the preliminary tool was piloted (n = 80). A final 11-item pain assessment tool was developed comprising 5 closed-ended items evaluating pain intensity to diverse stimuli (thermal and sweet) and 6 closed-ended items assessing various aspects of pulp pain (such as spontaneity, duration, referral, postural pain, pain upon biting and requirement for analgesics). The tool was tested on 300 adult patients (age range = 18-54 years) who presented with symptoms indicating some form of pulpitis. The 11 items were each scored from 1 to 4, yielding a total score between 11 and 44. These scores were subsequently compared to a set of diagnoses made utilizing established clinical reference standards, these include patient history, clinical examination, periapical radiographs, and pulp testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All items in the tool reached an excellent content validity index score (≥0.83) for relevance. Following the pilot, six items were rephrased and five were removed. After final testing the constructed tool had a reliability coefficient of .8641, indicating a high level of internal consistency. Factor analysis extracted two factors that accounted for 59.61% of variance. The sensitivity and specificity was 95.36% and 86.58%, respectively. Likelihood ratio was 7.104 (LR+) and 0.05 (LR-) at cut-off point. The area under the ROC curve was 0.9714 with a SE of 0.0076. The cut off score by Youden index was 25 between reversible and irreversible pulpitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The developed tool proved to be both valid and reliable. It is the first comprehensive multidimensional tool designed to standardize the pulp pain assessment protocol, covering various attributes of pulp pain and effectively distinguishing between reversible and irreversible pulpitis with a defined cut-off score. Furthermore, its use is anticipated to provide support in diagnosing ambiguous cases of inflamed pulp, which is especially helpful for less experienced dentists.</p>","PeriodicalId":13724,"journal":{"name":"International endodontic journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International endodontic journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.14195","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Although many pain assessment tools exist, none are specific to the relatively unique presentation of pulpal pain. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a novel pain assessment tool based on pulp symptoms.

Methodology: A preliminary list of items best-describing pulpitis was developed based on deductive and inductive approaches and the preliminary tool was piloted (n = 80). A final 11-item pain assessment tool was developed comprising 5 closed-ended items evaluating pain intensity to diverse stimuli (thermal and sweet) and 6 closed-ended items assessing various aspects of pulp pain (such as spontaneity, duration, referral, postural pain, pain upon biting and requirement for analgesics). The tool was tested on 300 adult patients (age range = 18-54 years) who presented with symptoms indicating some form of pulpitis. The 11 items were each scored from 1 to 4, yielding a total score between 11 and 44. These scores were subsequently compared to a set of diagnoses made utilizing established clinical reference standards, these include patient history, clinical examination, periapical radiographs, and pulp testing.

Results: All items in the tool reached an excellent content validity index score (≥0.83) for relevance. Following the pilot, six items were rephrased and five were removed. After final testing the constructed tool had a reliability coefficient of .8641, indicating a high level of internal consistency. Factor analysis extracted two factors that accounted for 59.61% of variance. The sensitivity and specificity was 95.36% and 86.58%, respectively. Likelihood ratio was 7.104 (LR+) and 0.05 (LR-) at cut-off point. The area under the ROC curve was 0.9714 with a SE of 0.0076. The cut off score by Youden index was 25 between reversible and irreversible pulpitis.

Conclusions: The developed tool proved to be both valid and reliable. It is the first comprehensive multidimensional tool designed to standardize the pulp pain assessment protocol, covering various attributes of pulp pain and effectively distinguishing between reversible and irreversible pulpitis with a defined cut-off score. Furthermore, its use is anticipated to provide support in diagnosing ambiguous cases of inflamed pulp, which is especially helpful for less experienced dentists.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新的疼痛评估工具,专门针对牙髓症状,以帮助诊断。
目的:虽然存在许多疼痛评估工具,但没有一个是针对相对独特的牙髓疼痛表现的。本研究的目的是开发并验证一种基于牙髓症状的新型疼痛评估工具。方法:根据演绎法和归纳法制定了一份最能描述牙髓炎的初步清单,并对初步工具进行了试验(n = 80)。最终的11项疼痛评估工具包括5个封闭项目评估不同刺激(热刺激和甜刺激)的疼痛强度,6个封闭项目评估牙髓疼痛的各个方面(如自发性、持续时间、转诊、体位疼痛、咬痛和对止痛药的需求)。该工具在300名成年患者(年龄范围= 18-54岁)中进行了测试,这些患者表现出某种形式的牙髓炎症状。这11个项目的得分从1到4,总分在11到44之间。这些评分随后与一组利用既定临床参考标准做出的诊断进行比较,这些标准包括患者病史、临床检查、根尖周x光片和牙髓测试。结果:工具中所有条目的相关性均达到优秀的内容效度指数得分(≥0.83)。在试点之后,6个项目被重新措辞,5个项目被删除。经过最终测试,构建的工具具有0.8641的可靠度系数,表明内部一致性很高。因子分析提取了两个因子,占方差的59.61%。灵敏度为95.36%,特异度为86.58%。截止点似然比为7.104 (LR+)和0.05 (LR-)。ROC曲线下面积为0.9714,标准差为0.0076。可逆性牙髓炎与不可逆性牙髓炎的约登指数分值为25分。结论:所建立的工具是有效可靠的。它是第一个旨在标准化牙髓疼痛评估方案的综合性多维工具,涵盖了牙髓疼痛的各种属性,并通过定义的截止评分有效区分可复性和不可复性牙髓炎。此外,它的使用预计提供支持,在诊断含糊的情况下,牙髓发炎,这是特别有帮助的经验不足的牙医。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International endodontic journal
International endodontic journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
28.00%
发文量
195
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Endodontic Journal is published monthly and strives to publish original articles of the highest quality to disseminate scientific and clinical knowledge; all manuscripts are subjected to peer review. Original scientific articles are published in the areas of biomedical science, applied materials science, bioengineering, epidemiology and social science relevant to endodontic disease and its management, and to the restoration of root-treated teeth. In addition, review articles, reports of clinical cases, book reviews, summaries and abstracts of scientific meetings and news items are accepted. The International Endodontic Journal is essential reading for general dental practitioners, specialist endodontists, research, scientists and dental teachers.
期刊最新文献
A survey of cone beam computed tomography use amongst endodontic specialists in the United Kingdom. Characteristics of vertical root fractures at early stages: Evidence that dentinal microcracks are an experimental phenomenon. Issue Information Environmental stimuli-responsive hydrogels in endodontics: Advances and perspectives. FoxO1 mediates odontoblast differentiation of hDPSCs via B cell-derived ANGPTL1 in dental caries: A laboratory investigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1