Retrospective discrimination of PNES and epileptic seizure types using blood RNA signatures.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurology Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1007/s00415-024-12877-1
Katie Bullinger, Monica Dhakar, Andrea Pearson, Argyle Bumanglag, Emine Guven, Rashi Verma, Elham Amini, Robert S Sloviter, Jason DeBruyne, Roger P Simon, Robert Meller
{"title":"Retrospective discrimination of PNES and epileptic seizure types using blood RNA signatures.","authors":"Katie Bullinger, Monica Dhakar, Andrea Pearson, Argyle Bumanglag, Emine Guven, Rashi Verma, Elham Amini, Robert S Sloviter, Jason DeBruyne, Roger P Simon, Robert Meller","doi":"10.1007/s00415-024-12877-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The ability to differentiate epileptic- and non-epileptic events is challenging due to a lack of reliable molecular seizure biomarker that provide a retrospective diagnosis. Here, we use next generation sequencing methods on whole blood samples to identify changes in RNA expression following seizures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples were obtained from 32 patients undergoing video electroencephalogram (vEEG) monitoring. Blood samples were collected in PaxGene tubes at baseline (admission) and following a seizure event (4-6 h and 24 h later or discharge). EEG and video of clinical events were reviewed by the clinical team and study epileptologist and were classified as epileptic seizure, psychogenic nonepileptic spell (PNES), or other. RNA was extracted from blood and RNA expression was determined using RNA-sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We show significant differences in RNA profiles between patients that did or did not experience an epileptic seizure. Compared to baseline patients with PNES show large increases in RNA expression 4-6 h and 24 h post seizure. Conversely, genes that changed following epileptic seizure showed more modest changes associated with a decrease in immune system function. Transcript usage was changed between patients with PNES and epileptic seizure at all three time points examined. Lists of genes differentially expressed following PNES or epileptic seizure vs. all baseline samples were used as classifiers for prediction. Models generated using random forest and radial support vector machine algorithms were 100% accurate at predicting both PNES and epileptic seizures.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>These data suggest that blood gene expression changes may have utility to retrospectively identify patients who have suffered a seizure or seizure-like event as a cause of transient loss of consciousness.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 2","pages":"128"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12877-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The ability to differentiate epileptic- and non-epileptic events is challenging due to a lack of reliable molecular seizure biomarker that provide a retrospective diagnosis. Here, we use next generation sequencing methods on whole blood samples to identify changes in RNA expression following seizures.

Methods: Blood samples were obtained from 32 patients undergoing video electroencephalogram (vEEG) monitoring. Blood samples were collected in PaxGene tubes at baseline (admission) and following a seizure event (4-6 h and 24 h later or discharge). EEG and video of clinical events were reviewed by the clinical team and study epileptologist and were classified as epileptic seizure, psychogenic nonepileptic spell (PNES), or other. RNA was extracted from blood and RNA expression was determined using RNA-sequencing.

Results: We show significant differences in RNA profiles between patients that did or did not experience an epileptic seizure. Compared to baseline patients with PNES show large increases in RNA expression 4-6 h and 24 h post seizure. Conversely, genes that changed following epileptic seizure showed more modest changes associated with a decrease in immune system function. Transcript usage was changed between patients with PNES and epileptic seizure at all three time points examined. Lists of genes differentially expressed following PNES or epileptic seizure vs. all baseline samples were used as classifiers for prediction. Models generated using random forest and radial support vector machine algorithms were 100% accurate at predicting both PNES and epileptic seizures.

Significance: These data suggest that blood gene expression changes may have utility to retrospectively identify patients who have suffered a seizure or seizure-like event as a cause of transient loss of consciousness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用血液RNA特征对PNES和癫痫发作类型进行回顾性鉴别。
目的:由于缺乏可靠的分子癫痫生物标志物来提供回顾性诊断,区分癫痫和非癫痫事件的能力具有挑战性。在这里,我们使用全血样本的下一代测序方法来鉴定癫痫发作后RNA表达的变化。方法:对32例患者进行视频脑电图(vEEG)监测。在基线(入院)和癫痫发作后(4-6小时和24小时后或出院)在PaxGene管中采集血样。临床小组和研究癫痫病医生对临床事件的脑电图和视频进行审查,并将其分类为癫痫发作、心因性非癫痫发作(PNES)或其他。从血液中提取RNA,用RNA测序法测定RNA表达。结果:我们显示有或没有经历癫痫发作的患者的RNA谱有显著差异。与基线相比,PNES患者在癫痫发作后4-6小时和24小时的RNA表达明显增加。相反,癫痫发作后发生变化的基因显示出与免疫系统功能下降相关的更温和的变化。在检查的所有三个时间点,PNES患者和癫痫发作患者之间的转录使用发生了变化。与所有基线样本相比,PNES或癫痫发作后差异表达的基因列表被用作预测的分类器。使用随机森林和径向支持向量机算法生成的模型在预测PNES和癫痫发作方面准确率为100%。意义:这些数据表明,血液基因表达变化可能有助于回顾性识别因短暂意识丧失而遭受癫痫发作或癫痫样事件的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
期刊最新文献
Generalized epileptic discharges leading into focal onset seizure: GOFE seizures as the initial diagnosis of epilepsy. Three-year treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies modifies migraine course: the prospective, multicenter I-GRAINE study. Subarachnoid hemorrhage and finger-like projection predict recurrence in patients with lobar intracerebral hemorrhage. Characterizing the underlying microangiopathy of deep cerebellar intracerebral hemorrhage. Favorable long-term cognitive outcomes following recurrent ARIA linked to amyloid-lowering therapies: two cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1