Complete Blood Cell Count-Based Ratios Identify Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients Likely to Benefit from Perioperative Dexamethasone.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume Pub Date : 2025-01-15 Epub Date: 2024-11-20 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.24.00184
Julian Wier, Ian A Jones, Ryan Palmer, Cory K Mayfield, Nicholas J Kassebaum, Jay R Lieberman, Nathanael D Heckmann
{"title":"Complete Blood Cell Count-Based Ratios Identify Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients Likely to Benefit from Perioperative Dexamethasone.","authors":"Julian Wier, Ian A Jones, Ryan Palmer, Cory K Mayfield, Nicholas J Kassebaum, Jay R Lieberman, Nathanael D Heckmann","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complete blood cell count-based ratios (CBRs), including the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), are inflammatory markers associated with postoperative morbidity. Given the link between the surgical stress response and complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), this study aimed to evaluate whether higher preoperative CBR values predict greater postoperative benefits associated with dexamethasone utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Premier Healthcare Database was queried for adult patients who underwent primary, elective total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA). Multivariable logistic regression models using dexamethasone exposure and CBRs as independent variables assessed primary end points of 90-day postoperative complications and length of stay (LOS) of ≥3 days. The probability difference between the dexamethasone and non-dexamethasone groups for each primary end point was determined across all values of each CBR. Probability differences were compared across CBR quartiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32,849 primary, elective TJAs (12,788 THAs [38.93%], 20,061 TKAs [61.07%]) performed between 2016 and 2021 were identified, and 22,282 (67.83%) of the patients received perioperative dexamethasone. Among patients with an NLR value of >1.00, those receiving dexamethasone had a lower probability of postoperative complications (all p < 0.05). Dexamethasone was associated with lower odds of an LOS of ≥3 days among patients in the highest NLR quartile (≥4.67) compared with the lowest quartile (NLR <1.84) (p = 0.002). Among patients with an MLR value of ≥0.36, those receiving dexamethasone had significantly lower odds of postoperative complications. Dexamethasone was associated with lower odds of an LOS of ≥3 days among patients with an MLR of ≥0.33 (the 2 highest quartiles) compared with an MLR of <0.24 (the lowest quartile) (p = 0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher NLR and MLR values were associated with greater marginal benefit from perioperative dexamethasone treatment, establishing a modifiable link between adverse outcomes and perioperative inflammation in TJA.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":"107 2","pages":"163-173"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00184","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Complete blood cell count-based ratios (CBRs), including the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), are inflammatory markers associated with postoperative morbidity. Given the link between the surgical stress response and complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), this study aimed to evaluate whether higher preoperative CBR values predict greater postoperative benefits associated with dexamethasone utilization.

Methods: The Premier Healthcare Database was queried for adult patients who underwent primary, elective total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA). Multivariable logistic regression models using dexamethasone exposure and CBRs as independent variables assessed primary end points of 90-day postoperative complications and length of stay (LOS) of ≥3 days. The probability difference between the dexamethasone and non-dexamethasone groups for each primary end point was determined across all values of each CBR. Probability differences were compared across CBR quartiles.

Results: A total of 32,849 primary, elective TJAs (12,788 THAs [38.93%], 20,061 TKAs [61.07%]) performed between 2016 and 2021 were identified, and 22,282 (67.83%) of the patients received perioperative dexamethasone. Among patients with an NLR value of >1.00, those receiving dexamethasone had a lower probability of postoperative complications (all p < 0.05). Dexamethasone was associated with lower odds of an LOS of ≥3 days among patients in the highest NLR quartile (≥4.67) compared with the lowest quartile (NLR <1.84) (p = 0.002). Among patients with an MLR value of ≥0.36, those receiving dexamethasone had significantly lower odds of postoperative complications. Dexamethasone was associated with lower odds of an LOS of ≥3 days among patients with an MLR of ≥0.33 (the 2 highest quartiles) compared with an MLR of <0.24 (the lowest quartile) (p = 0.039).

Conclusions: Higher NLR and MLR values were associated with greater marginal benefit from perioperative dexamethasone treatment, establishing a modifiable link between adverse outcomes and perioperative inflammation in TJA.

Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全血细胞计数为基础的比率确定全关节置换术患者可能受益于围手术期地塞米松。
背景:全血细胞计数比(CBRs),包括中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比(NLR)和单核细胞-淋巴细胞比(MLR),是与术后发病率相关的炎症标志物。考虑到手术应激反应与全关节置换术(TJA)后并发症之间的联系,本研究旨在评估术前CBR值较高是否预示着地塞米松应用带来更大的术后获益。方法:查询Premier Healthcare数据库中接受过原发性、选择性全髋关节或膝关节置换术(THA或TKA)的成年患者。以地塞米松暴露和cbr为自变量的多变量logistic回归模型评估了术后90天并发症和≥3天住院时间(LOS)的主要终点。每个主要终点的地塞米松组和非地塞米松组之间的概率差异是通过每个CBR的所有值来确定的。在CBR四分位数之间比较概率差异。结果:2016年至2021年共进行了32,849例原发性选择性tja(12,788例tha[38.93%], 20,061例tka[61.07%]),其中22282例(67.83%)患者接受了围手术期地塞米松治疗。NLR值为bbb1.00的患者中,接受地塞米松治疗的患者术后并发症发生率较低(p < 0.05)。与最低四分位数(NLR)相比,最高NLR四分位数(≥4.67)的患者中地塞米松发生≥3天LOS的几率更低。结论:更高的NLR和MLR值与地塞米松围手术期治疗的更大边际效益相关,建立了TJA不良结局与围手术期炎症之间的可修改联系。证据等级:预后III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) has been the most valued source of information for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers for over 125 years and is the gold standard in peer-reviewed scientific information in the field. A core journal and essential reading for general as well as specialist orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, The Journal publishes evidence-based research to enhance the quality of care for orthopaedic patients. Standards of excellence and high quality are maintained in everything we do, from the science of the content published to the customer service we provide. JBJS is an independent, non-profit journal.
期刊最新文献
Association Between Surgeon Volume and Patient Outcomes After Elective Patellofemoral Arthroplasty: A Population-Based Cohort Study Using Data from the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics for England. Sclerotic Bone Adversely Affects Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Distribution in Patients with Spinal Tuberculosis: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study. Comparison of Adductor Canal Block Before Versus After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Terms of Pain, Stress, and Functional Outcomes: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Dysfunction of the Windlass Mechanism Is Associated with Hallux Rigidus: A Case-Control Study. What's Important (Arts & Humanities): The Bone Question.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1