Soft Coagulation Versus Argon Plasma Coagulation After Large Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyp Resection: A Meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of clinical gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000002119
Eric Smith, Yizhong Wu, Yichen Wang, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Saurabh Chandan, Marcello Maida, Marco Spadaccini, Antonio Facciorusso, Aasma Shaukat, Daryl Ramai, Clive Miranda
{"title":"Soft Coagulation Versus Argon Plasma Coagulation After Large Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyp Resection: A Meta-analysis.","authors":"Eric Smith, Yizhong Wu, Yichen Wang, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Saurabh Chandan, Marcello Maida, Marco Spadaccini, Antonio Facciorusso, Aasma Shaukat, Daryl Ramai, Clive Miranda","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Thermal ablative methods (such as argon plasma coagulation (APC) and soft tip snare coagulation (STSC) are commonly used to treat polyp margins. We aim to appraise the current literature and compare clinical outcomes between patients with treated (with APC vs. STSC) and non-treated endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) margins.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched major databases from inception until November 2023 for randomly controlled trials (RCTs) comparing EMR of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps with and without treated margins. Pooled data were analyzed for the primary outcome of recurrence at first screening colonoscopy, and adverse events. Analysis was performed using a random effects model and data were reported using 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5 RCT's were found, which included 1020 polyps (577 in treatment and 443 in control groups). Three studies included treatment with STSC and 3 studies used APC as the modality for margin ablation. Of the included patients, 53% were female and the average age was similar between treatment and control groups (65.9 vs. 66.1 y). Seventy-one percent of lesions were proximal to the splenic flexure. The mean follow-up to the first colonoscopy and average polyp size were comparable (6.3 vs. 6.2 mo; 28.2 vs. 28.0 mm, respectively). Pooled analysis showed that margin ablation was associated with significantly lower rates of recurrence [odds ratio (OR) 0.267, 95% CI 0.18-0.4, P<0.001] with low heterogeneity between studies (I2=0%, P=0.47). Pooled analysis showed no significant difference between STSC and APC in terms of recurrence (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.27-1.7, I2=0%, P=0.3) or adverse events (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.3-1.6, I2 13%, P=0.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study shows that ablation of EMR margins is very effective at preventing recurrence at first surveillance colonoscopy. We found no difference between STSC or APC in terms of polyp recurrence or adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Thermal ablative methods (such as argon plasma coagulation (APC) and soft tip snare coagulation (STSC) are commonly used to treat polyp margins. We aim to appraise the current literature and compare clinical outcomes between patients with treated (with APC vs. STSC) and non-treated endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) margins.

Methods: We searched major databases from inception until November 2023 for randomly controlled trials (RCTs) comparing EMR of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps with and without treated margins. Pooled data were analyzed for the primary outcome of recurrence at first screening colonoscopy, and adverse events. Analysis was performed using a random effects model and data were reported using 95% CIs.

Results: A total of 5 RCT's were found, which included 1020 polyps (577 in treatment and 443 in control groups). Three studies included treatment with STSC and 3 studies used APC as the modality for margin ablation. Of the included patients, 53% were female and the average age was similar between treatment and control groups (65.9 vs. 66.1 y). Seventy-one percent of lesions were proximal to the splenic flexure. The mean follow-up to the first colonoscopy and average polyp size were comparable (6.3 vs. 6.2 mo; 28.2 vs. 28.0 mm, respectively). Pooled analysis showed that margin ablation was associated with significantly lower rates of recurrence [odds ratio (OR) 0.267, 95% CI 0.18-0.4, P<0.001] with low heterogeneity between studies (I2=0%, P=0.47). Pooled analysis showed no significant difference between STSC and APC in terms of recurrence (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.27-1.7, I2=0%, P=0.3) or adverse events (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.3-1.6, I2 13%, P=0.46).

Conclusion: Our study shows that ablation of EMR margins is very effective at preventing recurrence at first surveillance colonoscopy. We found no difference between STSC or APC in terms of polyp recurrence or adverse outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软凝与氩气等离子体凝血在大结肠息肉切除术后:一项荟萃分析。
简介:热烧蚀方法(如氩等离子凝固(APC)和软尖圈套凝固(STSC))通常用于治疗息肉边缘。我们的目的是评估目前的文献,并比较治疗(APC与STSC)和未治疗的内镜粘膜切除(EMR)边缘患者的临床结果。方法:我们检索了主要数据库,从建立到2023年11月,随机对照试验(rct)比较了大的无带蒂结直肠息肉的EMR和未治疗的边缘。汇总数据分析首次结肠镜筛查时的复发和不良事件的主要结局。采用随机效应模型进行分析,数据报告采用95% ci。结果:共纳入5项随机对照试验,共纳入息肉1020例(治疗组577例,对照组443例)。3项研究包括STSC治疗,3项研究使用APC作为边缘消融的方式。在纳入的患者中,53%为女性,治疗组和对照组的平均年龄相似(65.9岁对66.1岁)。71%的病变位于脾屈曲近端。第一次结肠镜检查的平均随访时间和平均息肉大小相当(6.3个月对6.2个月;分别为28.2和28.0 mm)。综合分析显示,切缘消融与显著降低的复发率相关[比值比(OR) 0.267, 95% CI 0.18-0.4, p]。结论:我们的研究表明,在首次监测结肠镜检查中,EMR切缘消融对于预防复发非常有效。我们发现STSC和APC在息肉复发或不良结果方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
期刊最新文献
Association Between Different Types of Physical Activity and Hepatic Steatosis and Liver Fibrosis: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on NHANES. Efficacy of Endoscopic Therapy in Symptomatic Pancreatic Divisum: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Outcomes of ERCP in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis: A Nationwide Inpatient Assessment. Satisfaction With and Adherence to Off-Label Corticosteroids in Adolescents and Adults With Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Results of a Web-Based Survey in the United States. Do Patients With NASH-related Cirrhosis Have Better Overall Survival Compared With Other Etiologies of Cirrhosis? A Population-based Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1