Anatomy-driven segmentation of parafoveal optical coherence tomography (OCT) measures may improve associations with clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurology Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1007/s00415-024-12866-4
Omid Mirmosayyeb, Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, Robert Zivadinov, Dejan Jakimovski
{"title":"Anatomy-driven segmentation of parafoveal optical coherence tomography (OCT) measures may improve associations with clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Omid Mirmosayyeb, Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, Robert Zivadinov, Dejan Jakimovski","doi":"10.1007/s00415-024-12866-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous investigations on optical coherence tomography (OCT) in multiple sclerosis (MS) focused on generalizable macular and peri-papillary regions without considering the anatomic variations of the retinal layer thickness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the utility of parafoveal retinal layer thickness measured by OCT, underscoring its relationships with clinical outcomes in MS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 214 people with MS (pwMS) and 57 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. Spectral domain OCT evaluation using 1, 3, 6 mm Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid were conducted. The macular and parafoveal thickness (excluding the 1 mm foveal/umbo contribution) of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), and the peri-papillary RNFL (pRNFL) were measured. Multivariable step-wise logistic, linear and generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression models were used to assess the association between the OCT parameters and clinical MS outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The parafoveal RNFL thickness (d = 0.27, p = 0.023), GCL (d = 0.87, p < 0.001), IPL (d = 0.82, p < 0.001), and GCIPL (d = 0.85, p < 0.001) were all significantly lower in pwMS than HCs. Optic neuritis history [odds ratio (OR) = 0.84, p < 0.001] and progressive MS (PMS) status (OR = 0.92, p < 0.001) were both best predicted by parafoveal GCL. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was associated with the parafoveal thickness of GCL (standardized β = -0.472, p < 0.001) and pRNFL (standardized β = 0.187, p = 0.021). The parafoveal GCL thickness as predictor of MS disability was also confirmed by the GEE models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This investigation supports the potential use of parafoveal OCT segmentation as an alternative assessment method in detecting neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative processes in MS. Averaging of the parafoveal retinal layer thickness into the OCT measures may increase the sensitivity of the standard macular OCT segmentation outcomes. Further studies should aim at exploring the reproducibility of this OCT outcome and its longitudinal responsiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 2","pages":"141"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12866-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous investigations on optical coherence tomography (OCT) in multiple sclerosis (MS) focused on generalizable macular and peri-papillary regions without considering the anatomic variations of the retinal layer thickness.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the utility of parafoveal retinal layer thickness measured by OCT, underscoring its relationships with clinical outcomes in MS.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 214 people with MS (pwMS) and 57 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. Spectral domain OCT evaluation using 1, 3, 6 mm Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid were conducted. The macular and parafoveal thickness (excluding the 1 mm foveal/umbo contribution) of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), and the peri-papillary RNFL (pRNFL) were measured. Multivariable step-wise logistic, linear and generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression models were used to assess the association between the OCT parameters and clinical MS outcomes.

Results: The parafoveal RNFL thickness (d = 0.27, p = 0.023), GCL (d = 0.87, p < 0.001), IPL (d = 0.82, p < 0.001), and GCIPL (d = 0.85, p < 0.001) were all significantly lower in pwMS than HCs. Optic neuritis history [odds ratio (OR) = 0.84, p < 0.001] and progressive MS (PMS) status (OR = 0.92, p < 0.001) were both best predicted by parafoveal GCL. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was associated with the parafoveal thickness of GCL (standardized β = -0.472, p < 0.001) and pRNFL (standardized β = 0.187, p = 0.021). The parafoveal GCL thickness as predictor of MS disability was also confirmed by the GEE models.

Conclusion: This investigation supports the potential use of parafoveal OCT segmentation as an alternative assessment method in detecting neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative processes in MS. Averaging of the parafoveal retinal layer thickness into the OCT measures may increase the sensitivity of the standard macular OCT segmentation outcomes. Further studies should aim at exploring the reproducibility of this OCT outcome and its longitudinal responsiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解剖驱动分割的中央凹旁光学相干断层扫描(OCT)措施可能改善与多发性硬化症临床结果的关联。
背景:以往对多发性硬化症(MS)的光学相干断层扫描(OCT)研究主要集中在黄斑和乳头周围区域,而没有考虑视网膜层厚度的解剖变化。目的:本研究旨在评估OCT测量的视网膜中央窝旁层厚度的实用性,强调其与MS临床结局的关系。方法:在这项横断面研究中,214名MS患者(pwMS)和57名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照组(hc)入组。采用1、3、6 mm早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变研究网格进行光谱域OCT评价。测量视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)、神经节细胞-内丛状层(GCIPL)、神经节细胞层(GCL)、内丛状层(IPL)和乳头周围丛状层(pRNFL)的黄斑和中央凹旁厚度(不包括1 mm的中央凹/脐部贡献)。采用多变量逐步logistic、线性和广义估计方程(GEE)回归模型来评估OCT参数与临床MS结果之间的关系。结果:视网膜中央凹旁视网膜厚度(d = 0.27, p = 0.023), GCL (d = 0.87, p)。结论:本研究支持OCT中央凹旁分割作为一种检测ms神经炎症和神经退行性过程的替代评估方法,将视网膜中央凹旁层厚度平均到OCT测量中可以增加标准黄斑OCT分割结果的敏感性。进一步的研究应该旨在探索这种OCT结果的可重复性及其纵向响应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
期刊最新文献
Generalized epileptic discharges leading into focal onset seizure: GOFE seizures as the initial diagnosis of epilepsy. Three-year treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies modifies migraine course: the prospective, multicenter I-GRAINE study. Subarachnoid hemorrhage and finger-like projection predict recurrence in patients with lobar intracerebral hemorrhage. Characterizing the underlying microangiopathy of deep cerebellar intracerebral hemorrhage. Favorable long-term cognitive outcomes following recurrent ARIA linked to amyloid-lowering therapies: two cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1