Anatomy-driven segmentation of parafoveal optical coherence tomography (OCT) measures may improve associations with clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis.
Omid Mirmosayyeb, Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, Robert Zivadinov, Dejan Jakimovski
{"title":"Anatomy-driven segmentation of parafoveal optical coherence tomography (OCT) measures may improve associations with clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Omid Mirmosayyeb, Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, Robert Zivadinov, Dejan Jakimovski","doi":"10.1007/s00415-024-12866-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous investigations on optical coherence tomography (OCT) in multiple sclerosis (MS) focused on generalizable macular and peri-papillary regions without considering the anatomic variations of the retinal layer thickness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the utility of parafoveal retinal layer thickness measured by OCT, underscoring its relationships with clinical outcomes in MS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 214 people with MS (pwMS) and 57 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. Spectral domain OCT evaluation using 1, 3, 6 mm Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid were conducted. The macular and parafoveal thickness (excluding the 1 mm foveal/umbo contribution) of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), and the peri-papillary RNFL (pRNFL) were measured. Multivariable step-wise logistic, linear and generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression models were used to assess the association between the OCT parameters and clinical MS outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The parafoveal RNFL thickness (d = 0.27, p = 0.023), GCL (d = 0.87, p < 0.001), IPL (d = 0.82, p < 0.001), and GCIPL (d = 0.85, p < 0.001) were all significantly lower in pwMS than HCs. Optic neuritis history [odds ratio (OR) = 0.84, p < 0.001] and progressive MS (PMS) status (OR = 0.92, p < 0.001) were both best predicted by parafoveal GCL. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was associated with the parafoveal thickness of GCL (standardized β = -0.472, p < 0.001) and pRNFL (standardized β = 0.187, p = 0.021). The parafoveal GCL thickness as predictor of MS disability was also confirmed by the GEE models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This investigation supports the potential use of parafoveal OCT segmentation as an alternative assessment method in detecting neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative processes in MS. Averaging of the parafoveal retinal layer thickness into the OCT measures may increase the sensitivity of the standard macular OCT segmentation outcomes. Further studies should aim at exploring the reproducibility of this OCT outcome and its longitudinal responsiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 2","pages":"141"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12866-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Previous investigations on optical coherence tomography (OCT) in multiple sclerosis (MS) focused on generalizable macular and peri-papillary regions without considering the anatomic variations of the retinal layer thickness.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the utility of parafoveal retinal layer thickness measured by OCT, underscoring its relationships with clinical outcomes in MS.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 214 people with MS (pwMS) and 57 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. Spectral domain OCT evaluation using 1, 3, 6 mm Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid were conducted. The macular and parafoveal thickness (excluding the 1 mm foveal/umbo contribution) of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), and the peri-papillary RNFL (pRNFL) were measured. Multivariable step-wise logistic, linear and generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression models were used to assess the association between the OCT parameters and clinical MS outcomes.
Results: The parafoveal RNFL thickness (d = 0.27, p = 0.023), GCL (d = 0.87, p < 0.001), IPL (d = 0.82, p < 0.001), and GCIPL (d = 0.85, p < 0.001) were all significantly lower in pwMS than HCs. Optic neuritis history [odds ratio (OR) = 0.84, p < 0.001] and progressive MS (PMS) status (OR = 0.92, p < 0.001) were both best predicted by parafoveal GCL. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was associated with the parafoveal thickness of GCL (standardized β = -0.472, p < 0.001) and pRNFL (standardized β = 0.187, p = 0.021). The parafoveal GCL thickness as predictor of MS disability was also confirmed by the GEE models.
Conclusion: This investigation supports the potential use of parafoveal OCT segmentation as an alternative assessment method in detecting neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative processes in MS. Averaging of the parafoveal retinal layer thickness into the OCT measures may increase the sensitivity of the standard macular OCT segmentation outcomes. Further studies should aim at exploring the reproducibility of this OCT outcome and its longitudinal responsiveness.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field.
In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials.
Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.