Senne B Lageman, Amy Jolly, Nitin Sahi, Ferran Prados, Baris Kanber, Arman Eshaghi, Carmen Tur, Cyrus Eierud, Vince D Calhoun, Menno M Schoonheim, Declan T Chard
{"title":"Explaining cognitive function in multiple sclerosis through networks of grey and white matter features: a joint independent component analysis.","authors":"Senne B Lageman, Amy Jolly, Nitin Sahi, Ferran Prados, Baris Kanber, Arman Eshaghi, Carmen Tur, Cyrus Eierud, Vince D Calhoun, Menno M Schoonheim, Declan T Chard","doi":"10.1007/s00415-024-12795-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive impairment (CI) in multiple sclerosis (MS) is only partially explained by whole-brain volume measures, but independent component analysis (ICA) can extract regional patterns of damage in grey matter (GM) or white matter (WM) that have proven more closely associated with CI. Pathology in GM and WM occurs in parallel, and so patterns can span both. This study assessed whether joint-ICA of GM and WM features better explained cognitive function compared to single-tissue ICA. 89 people with MS underwent cognitive testing and magnetic resonance imaging. Structural T1 and diffusion-weighted images were used to measure GM volumes and WM connectomes (based on fractional anisotropy weighted by the number of streamlines). ICA was performed for each tissue type separately and as joint-ICA. For each tissue type and joint-ICA, 20 components were extracted. In stepwise linear regression models, joint-ICA components were significantly associated with all cognitive domains. Joint-ICA showed the highest variance explained for executive function (Adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.35) and visual memory (Adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.30), while WM-ICA explained the highest variance for working memory (Adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.23). No significant differences were found between joint-ICA and single-tissue ICA in information processing speed or verbal memory. This is the first MS study to explore GM and WM features in a joint-ICA approach and shows that joint-ICA outperforms single-tissue analysis in some, but not all cognitive domains. This highlights that cognitive domains are differentially affected by tissue-specific features in MS and that processes spanning GM and WM should be considered when explaining cognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 2","pages":"142"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735591/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12795-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cognitive impairment (CI) in multiple sclerosis (MS) is only partially explained by whole-brain volume measures, but independent component analysis (ICA) can extract regional patterns of damage in grey matter (GM) or white matter (WM) that have proven more closely associated with CI. Pathology in GM and WM occurs in parallel, and so patterns can span both. This study assessed whether joint-ICA of GM and WM features better explained cognitive function compared to single-tissue ICA. 89 people with MS underwent cognitive testing and magnetic resonance imaging. Structural T1 and diffusion-weighted images were used to measure GM volumes and WM connectomes (based on fractional anisotropy weighted by the number of streamlines). ICA was performed for each tissue type separately and as joint-ICA. For each tissue type and joint-ICA, 20 components were extracted. In stepwise linear regression models, joint-ICA components were significantly associated with all cognitive domains. Joint-ICA showed the highest variance explained for executive function (Adjusted R2 = 0.35) and visual memory (Adjusted R2 = 0.30), while WM-ICA explained the highest variance for working memory (Adjusted R2 = 0.23). No significant differences were found between joint-ICA and single-tissue ICA in information processing speed or verbal memory. This is the first MS study to explore GM and WM features in a joint-ICA approach and shows that joint-ICA outperforms single-tissue analysis in some, but not all cognitive domains. This highlights that cognitive domains are differentially affected by tissue-specific features in MS and that processes spanning GM and WM should be considered when explaining cognition.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field.
In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials.
Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.