Explaining cognitive function in multiple sclerosis through networks of grey and white matter features: a joint independent component analysis.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurology Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1007/s00415-024-12795-2
Senne B Lageman, Amy Jolly, Nitin Sahi, Ferran Prados, Baris Kanber, Arman Eshaghi, Carmen Tur, Cyrus Eierud, Vince D Calhoun, Menno M Schoonheim, Declan T Chard
{"title":"Explaining cognitive function in multiple sclerosis through networks of grey and white matter features: a joint independent component analysis.","authors":"Senne B Lageman, Amy Jolly, Nitin Sahi, Ferran Prados, Baris Kanber, Arman Eshaghi, Carmen Tur, Cyrus Eierud, Vince D Calhoun, Menno M Schoonheim, Declan T Chard","doi":"10.1007/s00415-024-12795-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive impairment (CI) in multiple sclerosis (MS) is only partially explained by whole-brain volume measures, but independent component analysis (ICA) can extract regional patterns of damage in grey matter (GM) or white matter (WM) that have proven more closely associated with CI. Pathology in GM and WM occurs in parallel, and so patterns can span both. This study assessed whether joint-ICA of GM and WM features better explained cognitive function compared to single-tissue ICA. 89 people with MS underwent cognitive testing and magnetic resonance imaging. Structural T1 and diffusion-weighted images were used to measure GM volumes and WM connectomes (based on fractional anisotropy weighted by the number of streamlines). ICA was performed for each tissue type separately and as joint-ICA. For each tissue type and joint-ICA, 20 components were extracted. In stepwise linear regression models, joint-ICA components were significantly associated with all cognitive domains. Joint-ICA showed the highest variance explained for executive function (Adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.35) and visual memory (Adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.30), while WM-ICA explained the highest variance for working memory (Adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.23). No significant differences were found between joint-ICA and single-tissue ICA in information processing speed or verbal memory. This is the first MS study to explore GM and WM features in a joint-ICA approach and shows that joint-ICA outperforms single-tissue analysis in some, but not all cognitive domains. This highlights that cognitive domains are differentially affected by tissue-specific features in MS and that processes spanning GM and WM should be considered when explaining cognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 2","pages":"142"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735591/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12795-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive impairment (CI) in multiple sclerosis (MS) is only partially explained by whole-brain volume measures, but independent component analysis (ICA) can extract regional patterns of damage in grey matter (GM) or white matter (WM) that have proven more closely associated with CI. Pathology in GM and WM occurs in parallel, and so patterns can span both. This study assessed whether joint-ICA of GM and WM features better explained cognitive function compared to single-tissue ICA. 89 people with MS underwent cognitive testing and magnetic resonance imaging. Structural T1 and diffusion-weighted images were used to measure GM volumes and WM connectomes (based on fractional anisotropy weighted by the number of streamlines). ICA was performed for each tissue type separately and as joint-ICA. For each tissue type and joint-ICA, 20 components were extracted. In stepwise linear regression models, joint-ICA components were significantly associated with all cognitive domains. Joint-ICA showed the highest variance explained for executive function (Adjusted R2 = 0.35) and visual memory (Adjusted R2 = 0.30), while WM-ICA explained the highest variance for working memory (Adjusted R2 = 0.23). No significant differences were found between joint-ICA and single-tissue ICA in information processing speed or verbal memory. This is the first MS study to explore GM and WM features in a joint-ICA approach and shows that joint-ICA outperforms single-tissue analysis in some, but not all cognitive domains. This highlights that cognitive domains are differentially affected by tissue-specific features in MS and that processes spanning GM and WM should be considered when explaining cognition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过灰质和白质特征网络解释多发性硬化症的认知功能:联合独立成分分析。
全脑容量测量只能部分解释多发性硬化症(MS)的认知障碍(CI),但独立成分分析(ICA)可以提取灰质(GM)或白质(WM)损伤的区域模式,这些模式已被证明与CI更密切相关。GM和WM的病理是并行发生的,因此模式可以跨越两者。本研究评估了与单组织ICA相比,GM和WM的联合ICA是否能更好地解释认知功能。89名多发性硬化症患者接受了认知测试和磁共振成像。结构T1和扩散加权图像用于测量GM体积和WM连接体(基于流线数量加权的分数各向异性)。分别对每种组织类型进行ICA,并作为关节ICA进行。每种组织类型和关节ica提取20种成分。在逐步线性回归模型中,关节ica成分与所有认知领域显著相关。联合ica对执行功能(调整R2 = 0.35)和视觉记忆(调整R2 = 0.30)的方差解释最高,而WM-ICA对工作记忆的方差解释最高(调整R2 = 0.23)。关节ICA和单组织ICA在信息处理速度和言语记忆方面无显著差异。这是首次在联合ica方法中探索GM和WM特征的MS研究,并表明联合ica在某些认知领域优于单组织分析,但并非所有认知领域。这强调了MS中认知领域受到组织特异性特征的不同影响,并且在解释认知时应考虑跨越GM和WM的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
期刊最新文献
Generalized epileptic discharges leading into focal onset seizure: GOFE seizures as the initial diagnosis of epilepsy. Three-year treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies modifies migraine course: the prospective, multicenter I-GRAINE study. Subarachnoid hemorrhage and finger-like projection predict recurrence in patients with lobar intracerebral hemorrhage. Characterizing the underlying microangiopathy of deep cerebellar intracerebral hemorrhage. Favorable long-term cognitive outcomes following recurrent ARIA linked to amyloid-lowering therapies: two cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1