An Automated Clinical Laboratory Decision Support System for Test Utilization, Medical Necessity Verification and Payment Processing.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Interactive Journal of Medical Research Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.2196/46007
Safedin Beqaj, Rojeet Shrestha, Tim Hamill
{"title":"An Automated Clinical Laboratory Decision Support System for Test Utilization, Medical Necessity Verification and Payment Processing.","authors":"Safedin Beqaj, Rojeet Shrestha, Tim Hamill","doi":"10.2196/46007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unstructured: </strong>Physicians could improve the efficiency of the healthcare system if a reliable resource were available to aid them in better understanding, selecting, and interpreting the diagnostic laboratory tests. It has been well established and widely recognized that (a) laboratory testing provides 70-85% of the objective data that physicians use in diagnosis and treatment of their patients, (b) orders for laboratory tests in the U.S. have increased with an estimated volume of 4-5 billion tests per year , (c) there is a lack of user friendly tools to guide physicians in their test selection and ordering, and (d) laboratory test overutilization and underutilization continue to represent a pervasive source of inefficiency in healthcare system. These inappropriate tests ordering not only lead to slower or incorrect diagnoses for patients but also add a significant financial burden. In addition, many ordered tests are not reimbursed from Medicare because they are not appropriate for the medical condition or were ordered with the wrong ICD-10 diagnostic code, not meeting the medical necessity. Therefore, current clinical laboratory test ordering procedures suffer from a quality gap. Often providers do not have access to an appropriate tool that uses evidence-based guidelines or algorithms to make sure that tests are not duplicated, over-, or under-utilized. This viewpoint lays out potential use of an automated laboratory Clinical Decision Support System (CDDS) that helps providers to order the right test for the right disease and documents the right reason or medical necessity to pay for the testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/46007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unstructured: Physicians could improve the efficiency of the healthcare system if a reliable resource were available to aid them in better understanding, selecting, and interpreting the diagnostic laboratory tests. It has been well established and widely recognized that (a) laboratory testing provides 70-85% of the objective data that physicians use in diagnosis and treatment of their patients, (b) orders for laboratory tests in the U.S. have increased with an estimated volume of 4-5 billion tests per year , (c) there is a lack of user friendly tools to guide physicians in their test selection and ordering, and (d) laboratory test overutilization and underutilization continue to represent a pervasive source of inefficiency in healthcare system. These inappropriate tests ordering not only lead to slower or incorrect diagnoses for patients but also add a significant financial burden. In addition, many ordered tests are not reimbursed from Medicare because they are not appropriate for the medical condition or were ordered with the wrong ICD-10 diagnostic code, not meeting the medical necessity. Therefore, current clinical laboratory test ordering procedures suffer from a quality gap. Often providers do not have access to an appropriate tool that uses evidence-based guidelines or algorithms to make sure that tests are not duplicated, over-, or under-utilized. This viewpoint lays out potential use of an automated laboratory Clinical Decision Support System (CDDS) that helps providers to order the right test for the right disease and documents the right reason or medical necessity to pay for the testing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于测试使用、医疗需求验证和支付处理的自动化临床实验室决策支持系统。
非结构化:如果有可靠的资源可以帮助医生更好地理解、选择和解释诊断性实验室测试,医生可以提高医疗保健系统的效率。已经建立并被广泛认可的是:(a)实验室检测提供了医生在诊断和治疗患者时使用的70-85%的客观数据,(b)美国实验室检测的订单以估计每年40 - 50亿次的数量增加,(c)缺乏用户友好的工具来指导医生选择和订购检测。(d)实验室检测的过度使用和利用不足仍然是医疗保健系统效率低下的普遍根源。这些不适当的检查顺序不仅导致患者诊断缓慢或不正确,而且还增加了重大的经济负担。此外,许多订购的测试没有得到医疗保险的报销,因为它们不适合医疗状况,或者是用错误的ICD-10诊断代码订购的,不符合医疗需要。因此,目前的临床实验室检测订购程序存在质量差距。提供者往往无法获得适当的工具,这些工具使用循证准则或算法来确保不重复、不过度或不充分利用检测。这一观点阐述了自动化实验室临床决策支持系统(CDDS)的潜在用途,该系统可以帮助提供者为正确的疾病安排正确的检测,并记录支付检测费用的正确原因或医疗必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Interactive Journal of Medical Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Integration of Conventional and Virtual Reality Approaches in Augmented Reality for Theory-Based Psychoeducational Intervention Design for Chronic Low Back Pain: Scoping Review. The Effect of Combining mHealth and Health Professional-Led Intervention for Improving Health-Related Outcomes in Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. An Automated Clinical Laboratory Decision Support System for Test Utilization, Medical Necessity Verification and Payment Processing. Interstep Variations of Stairways and Associations of High-Contrast Striping and Fall-Related Events: Observational Study. Citizen Worry and Adherence in Response to Government Restrictions in Switzerland During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Repeated Cross-Sectional Online Surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1