Comparison of Mesotherapy and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in the Management of Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Q3 Medicine Tunisie Medicale Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI:10.62438/tunismed.v103i1.5187
Najla Mouhli, Soumaya Belghith, Souad Karoui, Maroua Slouma, Rim Dhahri, Faida Ajili, Rim Maaoui, Hajer Rahali
{"title":"Comparison of Mesotherapy and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in the Management of Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Najla Mouhli, Soumaya Belghith, Souad Karoui, Maroua Slouma, Rim Dhahri, Faida Ajili, Rim Maaoui, Hajer Rahali","doi":"10.62438/tunismed.v103i1.5187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction-Aim: Chronic low back pain affects 80% of individuals at some point in their lives and has significant socioeconomic impacts. This study aims to compare the efficacy of mesotherapy with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in treating chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized bicentric study was conducted at the Military Hospital of Tunis and the Multidisciplinary Military Polyclinic of Mefeteh Saadallah between August 2023 and June 2024. Sixty patients (40 men and 20 women) with chronic low back pain were included. Group 1 (TENS) received 6 sessions of neurostimulation twice a week for 3 weeks. Group 2 (mesotherapy) received 3 sessions of mesotherapy. Measurements included pain, analgesic consumption, physical examination, Oswestry Disability Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) score, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 293 patients consulted, 60 were included and randomized. Both groups showed significant pain improvement (p<0.001) with no notable difference between them (p=0.05). Analgesic consumption decreased more significantly with mesotherapy (p<0.001). Improvements in physical examination, Oswestry score, and HAD score were significant in both groups without significant differences between them. Patient satisfaction was high in both groups with an average score of 88/100 for TENS and 77/100 for mesotherapy (p=0.154).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Mesotherapy and TENS are effective in treating chronic low back pain, reducing pain and improving functional and psycho-emotional scores with no significant difference between them. Mesotherapy reduces analgesic consumption more. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":38818,"journal":{"name":"Tunisie Medicale","volume":"103 1","pages":"73-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunisie Medicale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62438/tunismed.v103i1.5187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction-Aim: Chronic low back pain affects 80% of individuals at some point in their lives and has significant socioeconomic impacts. This study aims to compare the efficacy of mesotherapy with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in treating chronic low back pain.

Methods: A randomized bicentric study was conducted at the Military Hospital of Tunis and the Multidisciplinary Military Polyclinic of Mefeteh Saadallah between August 2023 and June 2024. Sixty patients (40 men and 20 women) with chronic low back pain were included. Group 1 (TENS) received 6 sessions of neurostimulation twice a week for 3 weeks. Group 2 (mesotherapy) received 3 sessions of mesotherapy. Measurements included pain, analgesic consumption, physical examination, Oswestry Disability Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) score, and patient satisfaction.

Results: Out of 293 patients consulted, 60 were included and randomized. Both groups showed significant pain improvement (p<0.001) with no notable difference between them (p=0.05). Analgesic consumption decreased more significantly with mesotherapy (p<0.001). Improvements in physical examination, Oswestry score, and HAD score were significant in both groups without significant differences between them. Patient satisfaction was high in both groups with an average score of 88/100 for TENS and 77/100 for mesotherapy (p=0.154).

Discussion: Mesotherapy and TENS are effective in treating chronic low back pain, reducing pain and improving functional and psycho-emotional scores with no significant difference between them. Mesotherapy reduces analgesic consumption more. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中西医结合治疗与经皮神经电刺激治疗慢性非特异性腰痛的比较:一项随机临床试验。
目的:慢性腰痛影响80%的个体在其生命的某个阶段,并具有显著的社会经济影响。本研究旨在比较经皮神经电刺激(TENS)治疗慢性腰痛的疗效。方法:于2023年8月至2024年6月在突尼斯军事医院和Mefeteh Saadallah多学科军事综合诊所进行随机双中心研究。60例慢性腰痛患者(男性40例,女性20例)被纳入研究。第一组(TENS)接受6次神经刺激,每周2次,连续3周。第二组(化疗组)接受3个疗程的化疗。测量包括疼痛、镇痛药消耗、体格检查、Oswestry残疾指数、医院焦虑和抑郁(HAD)评分和患者满意度。结果:在293例患者中,60例被纳入随机分组。两组均有明显的疼痛改善(p讨论:美索疗法和TENS治疗慢性腰痛有效,减轻疼痛,改善功能和心理情绪评分,两组间无显著差异。美施疗法更能减少镇痛药的消耗。需要进一步的研究来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tunisie Medicale
Tunisie Medicale Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊最新文献
Acute on chronic liver failure: Diagnosis and evolution profile. An unusual cause of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in an infant: A case report and brief literature review. Chronic total occlusion- Percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) experience in a single, multi-operator Tunisian center : A Five-Year Report. Comparative Analysis of Long-Standing and Newly Diagnosed Diabetes Mellitus in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Tunisian Multicenter Study. High performance COVID-19 screening using machine learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1