Feasibility trial of STRONG: A digital intervention to improve nutritional management for individuals with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer.
Yu Chen Lin, Jose M Pimiento, Jeanine Milano, Diane Riccardi, Nakesha Mckinnie, Emma Hume, Olivia Sprow, Sophia Diaz-Carraway, Mara Budnetz, Ryan Hagen, Mohammed Al-Jumayli, Allan Lima Pereira, Andrew J Sinnamon, Ashwin Somasundaram, Jennifer B Permuth, Amir Alishahi Tabriz, Kea Turner
{"title":"Feasibility trial of STRONG: A digital intervention to improve nutritional management for individuals with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer.","authors":"Yu Chen Lin, Jose M Pimiento, Jeanine Milano, Diane Riccardi, Nakesha Mckinnie, Emma Hume, Olivia Sprow, Sophia Diaz-Carraway, Mara Budnetz, Ryan Hagen, Mohammed Al-Jumayli, Allan Lima Pereira, Andrew J Sinnamon, Ashwin Somasundaram, Jennifer B Permuth, Amir Alishahi Tabriz, Kea Turner","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Individuals with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers are at especially high risk of malnutrition. However, most patients with malnutrition do not receive adequate nutritional support. We conducted a single-arm trial to test the implementation of Support Through Remote Observation and Nutrition Guidance (STRONG), a multilevel digital intervention to improve nutritional outcomes for patients with locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants received five nutritional counseling sessions with a dietitian, logged daily food intake through the Fitbit app, and completed five study assessments related to patient malnutrition, nutrition-related symptoms, and quality-of-life outcomes. We assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of STRONG against a priori benchmarks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (N = 17) had a median age of 68 years, and 71 % were male. Feasibility benchmarks were met for participants completing the baseline assessment (94 %), completing four out of five assessments (82 %), and participant retention (85 %). Among participants who only received an oral diet during the study period, adherence to dietetic appointments (89 %) and food intake tracking (78 %) were high. Participant recruitment rate (47 %) was slightly below the benchmark (50 %). All participants found the intervention to be acceptable. Usability of the intervention was high, with 69 % and 92 % of participants reporting high satisfaction with tracking food intake through the Fitbit and the dietitian-led nutrition counseling sessions, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrated that STRONG could be implemented with high feasibility, acceptability, and usability for esophageal and GEJ cancer patients. Findings from this study can guide a future efficacy study to assess the impact of STRONG on patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The Support Through Remote Observation and Nutrition Guidance Program for Gastroesophageal Cancer Patients (STRONG-GEC) study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05438940) in June 2022 prior to participant enrollment.</p>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"43 ","pages":"101421"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732474/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Individuals with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers are at especially high risk of malnutrition. However, most patients with malnutrition do not receive adequate nutritional support. We conducted a single-arm trial to test the implementation of Support Through Remote Observation and Nutrition Guidance (STRONG), a multilevel digital intervention to improve nutritional outcomes for patients with locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer.
Methods: Participants received five nutritional counseling sessions with a dietitian, logged daily food intake through the Fitbit app, and completed five study assessments related to patient malnutrition, nutrition-related symptoms, and quality-of-life outcomes. We assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of STRONG against a priori benchmarks.
Results: Participants (N = 17) had a median age of 68 years, and 71 % were male. Feasibility benchmarks were met for participants completing the baseline assessment (94 %), completing four out of five assessments (82 %), and participant retention (85 %). Among participants who only received an oral diet during the study period, adherence to dietetic appointments (89 %) and food intake tracking (78 %) were high. Participant recruitment rate (47 %) was slightly below the benchmark (50 %). All participants found the intervention to be acceptable. Usability of the intervention was high, with 69 % and 92 % of participants reporting high satisfaction with tracking food intake through the Fitbit and the dietitian-led nutrition counseling sessions, respectively.
Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that STRONG could be implemented with high feasibility, acceptability, and usability for esophageal and GEJ cancer patients. Findings from this study can guide a future efficacy study to assess the impact of STRONG on patient outcomes.
Clinical trial registration: The Support Through Remote Observation and Nutrition Guidance Program for Gastroesophageal Cancer Patients (STRONG-GEC) study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05438940) in June 2022 prior to participant enrollment.
期刊介绍：
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is an international peer reviewed open access journal that publishes articles pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from a wide range of disciplines including medicine, life science, pharmaceutical science, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioral science, and bioethics. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is unique in that it is outside the confines of disease specifications, and it strives to increase the transparency of medical research and reduce publication bias by publishing scientifically valid original research findings irrespective of their perceived importance, significance or impact. Both randomized and non-randomized trials are within the scope of the Journal. Some common topics include trial design rationale and methods, operational methodologies and challenges, and positive and negative trial results. In addition to original research, the Journal also welcomes other types of communications including, but are not limited to, methodology reviews, perspectives and discussions. Through timely dissemination of advances in clinical trials, the goal of Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is to serve as a platform to enhance the communication and collaboration within the global clinical trials community that ultimately advances this field of research for the benefit of patients.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
