Readiness potentials changed by decision-making in the chicken game.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Social Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1080/17470919.2025.2453528
Jin Gong, WenJing Qi, Li Sui
{"title":"Readiness potentials changed by decision-making in the chicken game.","authors":"Jin Gong, WenJing Qi, Li Sui","doi":"10.1080/17470919.2025.2453528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The chicken game, a well-established social dilemma paradigm, is widely used to study cooperative and competitive behaviors. Strategic decision-making in this game is influenced by the outcomes of cooperative and competitive interactions, with feedback-related event-related potentials (ERPs) during the feedback phase being a primary research focus. However, it remains unclear whether specific ERP components associated with strategic decision-making are present during the response phase. This study implemented a computerized chicken game featuring two cars - one representing the participant and the other the opponent - driving toward each other. Players chose to \"give way\" or \"go straight,\" with the opponent's decisions controlled by a computer under high-cooperation (70% \"give way\") and low-cooperation (30% \"give way\") conditions. Participants made their choices via key presses, and outcomes were presented during the feedback phase. Results revealed a readiness potential (RP) during the response phase, with increased RP amplitudes observed when participants could not accurately predict the opponent's choice, regardless of cooperation condition. These findings suggest that the RP component reflects strategic adjustments and decision-making processes in social dilemmas, providing a potential ERP marker for such contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":49511,"journal":{"name":"Social Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"361-366"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2025.2453528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The chicken game, a well-established social dilemma paradigm, is widely used to study cooperative and competitive behaviors. Strategic decision-making in this game is influenced by the outcomes of cooperative and competitive interactions, with feedback-related event-related potentials (ERPs) during the feedback phase being a primary research focus. However, it remains unclear whether specific ERP components associated with strategic decision-making are present during the response phase. This study implemented a computerized chicken game featuring two cars - one representing the participant and the other the opponent - driving toward each other. Players chose to "give way" or "go straight," with the opponent's decisions controlled by a computer under high-cooperation (70% "give way") and low-cooperation (30% "give way") conditions. Participants made their choices via key presses, and outcomes were presented during the feedback phase. Results revealed a readiness potential (RP) during the response phase, with increased RP amplitudes observed when participants could not accurately predict the opponent's choice, regardless of cooperation condition. These findings suggest that the RP component reflects strategic adjustments and decision-making processes in social dilemmas, providing a potential ERP marker for such contexts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鸡博弈中决策对准备电位的影响。
小鸡博弈是一个成熟的社会困境范式,被广泛用于研究合作和竞争行为。博弈中的战略决策受到合作和竞争交互结果的影响,反馈阶段的反馈相关事件相关电位(feedback- correlation event- correlation potential, erp)是研究的重点。然而,目前尚不清楚在响应阶段是否存在与战略决策相关的特定ERP组件。这项研究实施了一个计算机化的养鸡游戏,游戏中有两辆车——一辆代表参与者,另一辆代表对手——朝对方开过去。玩家选择“让路”或“直行”,对手的决定由计算机控制,在高合作(70%“让路”)和低合作(30%“让路”)条件下。参与者通过按键做出选择,并在反馈阶段呈现结果。结果显示,在反应阶段,当参与者无法准确预测对手的选择时,无论在何种合作条件下,都观察到准备电位(RP)的增加。这些发现表明RP成分反映了社会困境中的战略调整和决策过程,为这种情境提供了潜在的ERP标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Neuroscience
Social Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Neuroscience features original empirical Research Papers as well as targeted Reviews, Commentaries and Fast Track Brief Reports that examine how the brain mediates social behavior, social cognition, social interactions and relationships, group social dynamics, and related topics that deal with social/interpersonal psychology and neurobiology. Multi-paper symposia and special topic issues are organized and presented regularly as well. The goal of Social Neuroscience is to provide a place to publish empirical articles that intend to further our understanding of the neural mechanisms contributing to the development and maintenance of social behaviors, or to understanding how these mechanisms are disrupted in clinical disorders.
期刊最新文献
Social group size alters social behavior and dopaminergic and serotonergic systems. How does teaching experience impact brain processes underlying the theory of mind? Study on primary school educators. Embodied hyperscanning for studying social interaction: A scoping review of simultaneous brain and body measurements. Social and perceptual decisions predict differences in face inversion neural correlates: Implications for development and face perception methods. Exploring how first- and third-person narrative modulates neural activation during a social cognition task. An event-related potentials (ERPs) study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1