The prevalence of mental health issues among nursing students: An umbrella review synthesis of meta-analytic evidence.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Studies Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.104993
Maria Efstathiou, Varvara Kakaidi, George Tsitsas, Stefanos Mantzoukas, Mary Gouva, Elena Dragioti
{"title":"The prevalence of mental health issues among nursing students: An umbrella review synthesis of meta-analytic evidence.","authors":"Maria Efstathiou, Varvara Kakaidi, George Tsitsas, Stefanos Mantzoukas, Mary Gouva, Elena Dragioti","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.104993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ongoing global student mental health crisis indicates the urgent need for updated research specifically targeting nursing students. Considering their anticipated transition into healthcare professions, their mental well-being is critical, not only for their academic performance but also for the quality of care they will deliver in their professional roles.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the prevalence of mental health issues among nursing students by synthesizing data from systematic reviews and meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An umbrella review of published prevalence meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Publication records were retrieved from four databases-PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus-up to September 2024. The methodological quality of each meta-analysis was assessed using the A Measurement Tool for the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2). Assessment followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline checklist. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis, and the I<sup>2</sup> index was employed to assess between-study heterogeneity. Additionally, the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews tool was used to assess review quality, including calculation of overlap between primary studies and adherence to GRADE criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five meta-analyses, comprising 375 primary studies and a total of 171,828 nursing students, were included, revealing an overall prevalence of mental health issues at 27 % (95 % CI: 25 % - 30 %). Sleep disturbances were the most prevalent at 50 % (95 % CI: 28 % - 72 %), followed by fear at 41 % (95 % CI: 7 % - 75 %), burnout at 32 % (95 % CI: 25 % - 38 %), and depression at 29 % (95 % CI: 21 % - 38 %). Nomophobia/smartphone addiction had a prevalence of 30 % (95 % CI: 12 % - 49 %), anxiety 29 % (95 % CI: 17 % - 40 %), and stress 27 % (95 % CI: 17 % - 37 %). Lower prevalence rates were observed for smoking, eating disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, and suicidal ideation/attempts. Significant heterogeneity was noted, particularly in the meta-analyses for anxiety, nomophobia/smartphone addiction, and stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our review identified eleven prevalent mental health issues among nursing students, with sleep disturbances, anxiety, depression, and burnout being the most common. Behavioral issues, such as nomophobia, are also rising concerns. These findings indicate the need for targeted interventions and further research into causal factors (e.g., geographical and cultural contexts), gender disparities (as most studies focused on female students), and resilience-building strategies.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The study protocol was uploaded to the Open Science Framework (OSF) at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EN7UX (registered on 28/10/23).</p><p><strong>Tweetable abstract: </strong>Among nursing students, overall mental health issues are at 27 %. Key concerns include sleep disturbances, burnout, anxiety, and depression. Nomophobia prevalence also warrants further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"163 ","pages":"104993"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.104993","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The ongoing global student mental health crisis indicates the urgent need for updated research specifically targeting nursing students. Considering their anticipated transition into healthcare professions, their mental well-being is critical, not only for their academic performance but also for the quality of care they will deliver in their professional roles.

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of mental health issues among nursing students by synthesizing data from systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Design: An umbrella review of published prevalence meta-analyses.

Review methods: Publication records were retrieved from four databases-PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus-up to September 2024. The methodological quality of each meta-analysis was assessed using the A Measurement Tool for the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2). Assessment followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline checklist. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis, and the I2 index was employed to assess between-study heterogeneity. Additionally, the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews tool was used to assess review quality, including calculation of overlap between primary studies and adherence to GRADE criteria.

Results: Twenty-five meta-analyses, comprising 375 primary studies and a total of 171,828 nursing students, were included, revealing an overall prevalence of mental health issues at 27 % (95 % CI: 25 % - 30 %). Sleep disturbances were the most prevalent at 50 % (95 % CI: 28 % - 72 %), followed by fear at 41 % (95 % CI: 7 % - 75 %), burnout at 32 % (95 % CI: 25 % - 38 %), and depression at 29 % (95 % CI: 21 % - 38 %). Nomophobia/smartphone addiction had a prevalence of 30 % (95 % CI: 12 % - 49 %), anxiety 29 % (95 % CI: 17 % - 40 %), and stress 27 % (95 % CI: 17 % - 37 %). Lower prevalence rates were observed for smoking, eating disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, and suicidal ideation/attempts. Significant heterogeneity was noted, particularly in the meta-analyses for anxiety, nomophobia/smartphone addiction, and stress.

Conclusions: Our review identified eleven prevalent mental health issues among nursing students, with sleep disturbances, anxiety, depression, and burnout being the most common. Behavioral issues, such as nomophobia, are also rising concerns. These findings indicate the need for targeted interventions and further research into causal factors (e.g., geographical and cultural contexts), gender disparities (as most studies focused on female students), and resilience-building strategies.

Registration: The study protocol was uploaded to the Open Science Framework (OSF) at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EN7UX (registered on 28/10/23).

Tweetable abstract: Among nursing students, overall mental health issues are at 27 %. Key concerns include sleep disturbances, burnout, anxiety, and depression. Nomophobia prevalence also warrants further study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护生中心理健康问题的普遍性:综合meta分析证据的综述。
背景:持续的全球学生心理健康危机表明迫切需要更新专门针对护理学生的研究。考虑到他们进入医疗保健行业的预期转变,他们的心理健康是至关重要的,不仅对他们的学业成绩,而且对他们在专业角色中提供的护理质量也至关重要。目的:通过综合系统综述和荟萃分析的数据,估计护生心理健康问题的患病率。设计:对已发表的流行病学荟萃分析进行综述。评审方法:从pubmed、CINAHL、PsycINFO和scopus四个数据库中检索到截至2024年9月的发表记录。使用多系统评价评估测量工具(AMSTAR-2)评估每个荟萃分析的方法学质量。评估遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)报告指南清单的首选报告项目。meta分析采用随机效应模型,I2指数评价研究间异质性。此外,使用系统评价偏倚风险工具来评估评价质量,包括计算主要研究之间的重叠和对GRADE标准的遵守。结果:纳入了25项荟萃分析,包括375项主要研究和171,828名护理学生,显示精神健康问题的总体患病率为27% (95% CI: 25% - 30%)。睡眠障碍最普遍,占50% (95% CI: 28% - 72%),其次是恐惧,占41% (95% CI: 7% - 75%),倦怠,占32% (95% CI: 25% - 38%),抑郁,占29% (95% CI: 21% - 38%)。无手机恐惧症/智能手机成瘾的患病率为30% (95% CI: 12% - 49%),焦虑为29% (95% CI: 17% - 40%),压力为27% (95% CI: 17% - 37%)。吸烟、饮食失调、创伤后应激障碍和自杀意念/企图的患病率较低。显著的异质性被注意到,特别是在焦虑、无手机恐惧症/智能手机成瘾和压力的荟萃分析中。结论:我们的综述确定了护生中11种常见的心理健康问题,其中睡眠障碍、焦虑、抑郁和倦怠是最常见的。行为问题,如无手机恐惧症,也越来越受到关注。这些发现表明,需要有针对性的干预措施,并进一步研究因果因素(例如,地理和文化背景)、性别差异(因为大多数研究集中在女学生上)和恢复力建设策略。注册:研究方案已上传到开放科学框架(OSF) https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EN7UX(注册日期为28/10/23)。摘要:在护生中,整体心理健康问题占27%。主要问题包括睡眠障碍、倦怠、焦虑和抑郁。无恐惧症的流行程度也值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
181
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Studies (IJNS) is a highly respected journal that has been publishing original peer-reviewed articles since 1963. It provides a forum for original research and scholarship about health care delivery, organisation, management, workforce, policy, and research methods relevant to nursing, midwifery, and other health related professions. The journal aims to support evidence informed policy and practice by publishing research, systematic and other scholarly reviews, critical discussion, and commentary of the highest standard. The IJNS is indexed in major databases including PubMed, Medline, Thomson Reuters - Science Citation Index, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Social Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the BNI (British Nursing Index).
期刊最新文献
Tailored personas for self-management in home-based cardiac rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: A qualitative study. Empowerment through knowledge: Qualitative perceptions of 'undetectable equals Untransmittable' among people living with HIV and tuberculosis in South Africa. Think local, write global: Writing peer-reviewed research papers for an international audience. Comment on Liu et al. (2024) 'Patient preferences and willingness to pay for central venous access devices in breast cancer: A multicenter discrete choice experiment' Comment on Fajarini et al. (2024) 'Effects of advanced practice nurses on health-care costs, quality of care, and patient well-being: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials'.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1