Current state and future perspectives of spinal navigation and robotics—an AO spine survey

IF 2.5 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain & spine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2024.104165
Stefan Motov , Vicki M. Butenschoen , Philipp E. Krauss , Anand Veeravagu , Kelly H. Yoo , Felix C. Stengel , Nader Hejrati , Martin N. Stienen
{"title":"Current state and future perspectives of spinal navigation and robotics—an AO spine survey","authors":"Stefan Motov ,&nbsp;Vicki M. Butenschoen ,&nbsp;Philipp E. Krauss ,&nbsp;Anand Veeravagu ,&nbsp;Kelly H. Yoo ,&nbsp;Felix C. Stengel ,&nbsp;Nader Hejrati ,&nbsp;Martin N. Stienen","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2024.104165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The use of robotics in spine surgery has gained popularity. This study aims to assess the current state of robotics and raise awareness of its educational implications.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>What are the current adoption trends and barriers to the implementation of robotic assistance in spine surgery?</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>An online questionnaire comprising 27 questions was distributed to AO spine members between October 25th and November 13th, 2023, using the SurveyMonkey platform (<span><span>https://www.surveymonkey.com</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>; SurveyMonkey Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA). Statistical analyses (descriptive statistics, Pearson Chi-Square tests) and generation of all graphs were performed using SPSS Version 29.0.1.0 (IBM SPSS Statistic).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We received 424 responses from AO Spine members (response rate = 9.9 %). The participants were mostly board-certified orthopedic surgeons (46 %, n = 195) and neurosurgeons (32%, n = 136). While 49% (n = 208) of the participants reported occasional or frequent use of navigation assistance, only 18 % (n = 70) indicated the use of robotic assistance for spinal instrumentation. A significant difference based on the country's median income status (p &lt; 0.001) and the respondent's number of annual instrumentation procedures (p &lt; 0.001) has been observed. While 11 % (n = 47) of all surgeons use a spinal robot frequently, 36 % (n = 153) of the participants stated they don't need a robot from a current perspective. Most participants (77%, n = 301) concluded that high acquisition costs are the primary barrier for the implementation of robotics.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><div>Although the hype for robotics in spine surgery increased recently, robotic systems remain non-standard equipment due to cost constraints and limited usability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 104165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424014218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The use of robotics in spine surgery has gained popularity. This study aims to assess the current state of robotics and raise awareness of its educational implications.

Research question

What are the current adoption trends and barriers to the implementation of robotic assistance in spine surgery?

Material and methods

An online questionnaire comprising 27 questions was distributed to AO spine members between October 25th and November 13th, 2023, using the SurveyMonkey platform (https://www.surveymonkey.com; SurveyMonkey Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA). Statistical analyses (descriptive statistics, Pearson Chi-Square tests) and generation of all graphs were performed using SPSS Version 29.0.1.0 (IBM SPSS Statistic).

Results

We received 424 responses from AO Spine members (response rate = 9.9 %). The participants were mostly board-certified orthopedic surgeons (46 %, n = 195) and neurosurgeons (32%, n = 136). While 49% (n = 208) of the participants reported occasional or frequent use of navigation assistance, only 18 % (n = 70) indicated the use of robotic assistance for spinal instrumentation. A significant difference based on the country's median income status (p < 0.001) and the respondent's number of annual instrumentation procedures (p < 0.001) has been observed. While 11 % (n = 47) of all surgeons use a spinal robot frequently, 36 % (n = 153) of the participants stated they don't need a robot from a current perspective. Most participants (77%, n = 301) concluded that high acquisition costs are the primary barrier for the implementation of robotics.

Discussion and conclusion

Although the hype for robotics in spine surgery increased recently, robotic systems remain non-standard equipment due to cost constraints and limited usability.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊柱导航和机器人技术的现状和未来展望——AO脊柱调查。
机器人技术在脊柱外科手术中的应用越来越受欢迎。本研究旨在评估机器人技术的现状,并提高人们对其教育意义的认识。研究问题:目前在脊柱外科中应用机器人辅助的趋势和障碍是什么?材料与方法:于2023年10月25日至11月13日,通过SurveyMonkey平台(https://www.surveymonkey.com;SurveyMonkey Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA)。使用SPSS Version 29.0.1.0 (IBM SPSS Statistic)进行统计分析(描述性统计、Pearson Chi-Square检验)和所有图表的生成。结果:我们收到了来自AO Spine会员的424份回复(回复率为9.9%)。参与者大多是获得委员会认证的骨科医生(46%,n = 195)和神经外科医生(32%,n = 136)。49% (n = 208)的参与者报告偶尔或频繁使用导航辅助,只有18% (n = 70)的参与者表示使用机器人辅助脊柱内固定。讨论和结论:尽管最近脊柱外科对机器人技术的宣传有所增加,但由于成本限制和可用性有限,机器人系统仍然是非标准设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
期刊最新文献
Temporal muscle measurements as predictor for outcome in a cohort of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients Implementation of the open surgery reporting guidelines in ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations: Feasability and adaptations Influence of epilepsy and antiepileptic drug intake in patients suffering from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage on outcome Overall survival following treatment of central nervous system meningeal melanocytomas: Insights from the national cancer database (NCDB) Treatment strategies for incomplete burst fractures (AO Spine A3) at the thoracolumbar junction -results of a nationwide German survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1