Did the Covid-19 Pandemic Impact Time to Surgery, Length of Hospital Stay, or Discharge Location for Subaxial Cervical Spine Fractures Requiring Surgical Intervention?

The Iowa orthopaedic journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Christopher Lucasti, Maxwell M Scott, Dil V Patel, Emily K Vallee, Benjamin C Graham, Lindsey Clark, Joseph Kowalski
{"title":"Did the Covid-19 Pandemic Impact Time to Surgery, Length of Hospital Stay, or Discharge Location for Subaxial Cervical Spine Fractures Requiring Surgical Intervention?","authors":"Christopher Lucasti, Maxwell M Scott, Dil V Patel, Emily K Vallee, Benjamin C Graham, Lindsey Clark, Joseph Kowalski","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare systems across the United States resources were consumed caring for COVID-19 patients. Past research on trauma activations during COVID-19 has found changes to hospital length of stay and discharge locations. Subaxial spine fractures are potentially debilitating injuries that require timely surgery and extensive rehabilitation. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to compare the severity of cervical spine injuries, time to surgery, hospital length of stay, and discharge disposition for patients presenting during COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>128 patients with subaxial fractures from a Level One Adult Trauma Center that required surgical intervention were reviewed. The primary outcomes included hospital length of stay, ICU days, time to surgery, complications, and discharge location in patients with subaxial cervical fractures during COVID-19 pandemic versus immediately before the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When comparing the pre-COVID-19 period to the COVID-19 group, there was no difference in time to surgery or overall length of stay (2.47 vs. 2.35 days and 12.93 vs. 13.82 days, p>0.05). There was no difference in number of patients discharged home during COVID-19 (41% (32/79) vs. 37% (18/49) p>0.05) or patients discharged to hospital rehab (33%, (26/79) vs. 35% (17/49), p>0.05). A similar percentage of patients had complications within 90 days of discharge (16% (12/75) vs. 22% (10/46), p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the burden COVID-19 placed on healthcare systems, it did not affect post-operative hospital course of subaxial fracture patients with potentially debilitating injuries. This vulnerable subset of patients presenting during COVID-19 was still able to undergo timely surgery, have an appropriate hospital length of stay, and be discharged to rehabilitation centers. In future stresses to the healthcare system, deferring elective and non-emergent procedures can allow proper care for emergencies such as subaxial fractures. <b>Level of Evidence: II</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94233,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":"44 2","pages":"106-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare systems across the United States resources were consumed caring for COVID-19 patients. Past research on trauma activations during COVID-19 has found changes to hospital length of stay and discharge locations. Subaxial spine fractures are potentially debilitating injuries that require timely surgery and extensive rehabilitation. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to compare the severity of cervical spine injuries, time to surgery, hospital length of stay, and discharge disposition for patients presenting during COVID-19.

Methods: 128 patients with subaxial fractures from a Level One Adult Trauma Center that required surgical intervention were reviewed. The primary outcomes included hospital length of stay, ICU days, time to surgery, complications, and discharge location in patients with subaxial cervical fractures during COVID-19 pandemic versus immediately before the pandemic.

Results: When comparing the pre-COVID-19 period to the COVID-19 group, there was no difference in time to surgery or overall length of stay (2.47 vs. 2.35 days and 12.93 vs. 13.82 days, p>0.05). There was no difference in number of patients discharged home during COVID-19 (41% (32/79) vs. 37% (18/49) p>0.05) or patients discharged to hospital rehab (33%, (26/79) vs. 35% (17/49), p>0.05). A similar percentage of patients had complications within 90 days of discharge (16% (12/75) vs. 22% (10/46), p>0.05).

Conclusion: Despite the burden COVID-19 placed on healthcare systems, it did not affect post-operative hospital course of subaxial fracture patients with potentially debilitating injuries. This vulnerable subset of patients presenting during COVID-19 was still able to undergo timely surgery, have an appropriate hospital length of stay, and be discharged to rehabilitation centers. In future stresses to the healthcare system, deferring elective and non-emergent procedures can allow proper care for emergencies such as subaxial fractures. Level of Evidence: II.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Covid-19 大流行是否影响了需要手术治疗的颈椎轴下骨折的手术时间、住院时间或出院地点?
背景:COVID-19大流行破坏了美国各地的医疗保健系统,资源被消耗在照顾COVID-19患者上。过去对COVID-19期间创伤激活的研究发现,住院时间和出院地点发生了变化。脊柱下轴骨折是潜在的衰弱性损伤,需要及时手术和广泛的康复。因此,本研究的目的是比较COVID-19期间出现的患者颈椎损伤的严重程度、手术时间、住院时间和出院处置。方法:对128例需要手术治疗的下轴骨折患者进行回顾性分析。主要结局包括COVID-19大流行期间与大流行前相比,颈椎下轴骨折患者的住院时间、ICU天数、手术时间、并发症和出院地点。结果:新冠肺炎前期与新冠肺炎组比较,手术时间和总住院时间差异无统计学意义(2.47天vs 2.35天,12.93天vs 13.82天,p < 0.05)。在COVID-19期间出院回家的患者数量(41%(32/79)对37% (18/49)p>0.05)或出院到医院康复的患者数量(33%,(26/79)对35% (17/49),p>0.05)无差异。出院后90天内出现并发症的患者比例相似(16% (12/75)vs 22% (10/46), p < 0.05)。结论:尽管COVID-19给医疗系统带来了负担,但它并未影响轴下骨折患者术后的住院过程。这些在COVID-19期间出现的弱势患者仍然能够及时接受手术,适当的住院时间,并出院到康复中心。在未来对医疗系统的压力,推迟选择性和非紧急程序可以允许适当的护理紧急情况,如轴下骨折。证据水平:II。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pain Management for Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Systematic Review. Peri-Operative Management of Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Report of Current Practices from the Anchor Group, Supporting Literature, and Areas for Future Investigation. Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Very Young Children - A Case Report and Modern Review. Predicting Septic Arthritis in the Setting of Crystalline Arthropathy in the Native Joint Using Laboratory Data. Predictive Factors for Intraoperative Determination for the Need of Femoral Osteochondroplasty After Periacetabular Osteotomy for Acetabular Dysplasia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1