Song Ke;Leyan Ding;Xingye Shi;Peixiao Fan;Hongli Wang;Lei Chen;Jun Yang;Chi Yung Chung
{"title":"Response Characteristics and Regulation Feasibility of DC Charging Station Controlled by GFM/GFL Virtual Inertia for Grid Frequency Stability","authors":"Song Ke;Leyan Ding;Xingye Shi;Peixiao Fan;Hongli Wang;Lei Chen;Jun Yang;Chi Yung Chung","doi":"10.1109/TTE.2025.3530969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To investigate the feasibility and differences between the grid-forming (GFM) and grid-following (GFL) control strategies for the frequency response (FR) in dc charging stations (CSs), this article first identifies the characteristics of the virtual inertia of GFM and GFL, and establishes an analytical model of the system FR considering FR in CSs. Second, the virtual inertia response control model of CSs is proposed under GFM and GFL controls, respectively. And their FR characteristics are analyzed. Finally, the FR characteristics of CS FR under variations of time delay, FR capacity, and virtual inertia are analyzed in the improved IEEE three-machine nine-node and ten-machine 39-node benchmarks. The results show that the FR of the GFM CS is less affected by time delay and can affect the grid frequency in the form of inertia when the amount of electric vehicles (EVs) required in the CS groups is about 300–400. Whereas the overcapacity of the GFL CS will cause the system frequency to oscillate. Therefore, the choice of virtual inertia control strategy adopted by the CS is closely related to the number of EVs in the station and its adjustable margin.","PeriodicalId":56269,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification","volume":"11 3","pages":"7743-7758"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10844898/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To investigate the feasibility and differences between the grid-forming (GFM) and grid-following (GFL) control strategies for the frequency response (FR) in dc charging stations (CSs), this article first identifies the characteristics of the virtual inertia of GFM and GFL, and establishes an analytical model of the system FR considering FR in CSs. Second, the virtual inertia response control model of CSs is proposed under GFM and GFL controls, respectively. And their FR characteristics are analyzed. Finally, the FR characteristics of CS FR under variations of time delay, FR capacity, and virtual inertia are analyzed in the improved IEEE three-machine nine-node and ten-machine 39-node benchmarks. The results show that the FR of the GFM CS is less affected by time delay and can affect the grid frequency in the form of inertia when the amount of electric vehicles (EVs) required in the CS groups is about 300–400. Whereas the overcapacity of the GFL CS will cause the system frequency to oscillate. Therefore, the choice of virtual inertia control strategy adopted by the CS is closely related to the number of EVs in the station and its adjustable margin.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification is focused on components, sub-systems, systems, standards, and grid interface technologies related to power and energy conversion, propulsion, and actuation for all types of electrified vehicles including on-road, off-road, off-highway, and rail vehicles, airplanes, and ships.