Utilization of Telemedicine for Patients Receiving In-center Hemodialysis in the United States.

IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of The American Society of Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1681/asn.0000000619
Jingbo Niu,Omar Rosales,Abiodun Oluyomi,Susie Q Lew,Glenn M Chertow,Wolfgang C Winkelmayer,Kevin F Erickson
{"title":"Utilization of Telemedicine for Patients Receiving In-center Hemodialysis in the United States.","authors":"Jingbo Niu,Omar Rosales,Abiodun Oluyomi,Susie Q Lew,Glenn M Chertow,Wolfgang C Winkelmayer,Kevin F Erickson","doi":"10.1681/asn.0000000619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nIn March 2020, responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, federal emergency waivers in the United States enabled kidney care providers (nephrologists and advanced practice providers) to substitute face-to-face in-center hemodialysis visits with telemedicine encounters. We examined whether the frequency of kidney care provider visits and hospitalizations were associated with telemedicine use in hemodialysis care.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe used Medicare claims to identify US patients receiving in-center hemodialysis during the first 16 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined the association between telemedicine use during in-center hemodialysis, the frequency with which kidney care providers visited patients at dialysis four-or-more times per month, and hospitalizations. We also examined whether the association between telemedicine use and visit frequency varied at facilities located in more remote areas. Multivariable regression models adjusted for patient, physician, geographic and dialysis facility characteristics along with the frequency with which kidney care providers saw patients at each facility before the pandemic. We focused on kidney care providers who demonstrated knowledge of how to bill for telemedicine visits by using the telemedicine modifier on prior claims.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nWe identified 1,881 providers who saw patients between 3/2020-6/2021 and were definitively using telemedicine. In the adjusted model, a 35% absolute higher use of telemedicine at a facility (representing one standard deviation difference) was associated with a 1.4% higher rate of four-or-more visits (Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) 1.014; 95% Confidence Interval 1.007-1.022). The association between telemedicine use and visit frequency was stronger where travel distances to facilities were farther (interaction p=0.01). There was no significant association between telemedicine use and hospitalizations.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe use of telemedicine to care for patients receiving in-center hemodialysis was associated with a slightly higher frequency of four-or-more visits per month but not with hospitalizations; the association with visit frequency was more pronounced in areas where providers had to travel longer distances to see patients in-person.","PeriodicalId":17217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.0000000619","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND In March 2020, responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, federal emergency waivers in the United States enabled kidney care providers (nephrologists and advanced practice providers) to substitute face-to-face in-center hemodialysis visits with telemedicine encounters. We examined whether the frequency of kidney care provider visits and hospitalizations were associated with telemedicine use in hemodialysis care. METHODS We used Medicare claims to identify US patients receiving in-center hemodialysis during the first 16 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined the association between telemedicine use during in-center hemodialysis, the frequency with which kidney care providers visited patients at dialysis four-or-more times per month, and hospitalizations. We also examined whether the association between telemedicine use and visit frequency varied at facilities located in more remote areas. Multivariable regression models adjusted for patient, physician, geographic and dialysis facility characteristics along with the frequency with which kidney care providers saw patients at each facility before the pandemic. We focused on kidney care providers who demonstrated knowledge of how to bill for telemedicine visits by using the telemedicine modifier on prior claims. RESULTS We identified 1,881 providers who saw patients between 3/2020-6/2021 and were definitively using telemedicine. In the adjusted model, a 35% absolute higher use of telemedicine at a facility (representing one standard deviation difference) was associated with a 1.4% higher rate of four-or-more visits (Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) 1.014; 95% Confidence Interval 1.007-1.022). The association between telemedicine use and visit frequency was stronger where travel distances to facilities were farther (interaction p=0.01). There was no significant association between telemedicine use and hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS The use of telemedicine to care for patients receiving in-center hemodialysis was associated with a slightly higher frequency of four-or-more visits per month but not with hospitalizations; the association with visit frequency was more pronounced in areas where providers had to travel longer distances to see patients in-person.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程医疗在美国接受中心血液透析患者中的应用
背景 2020 年 3 月,为应对 COVID-19 大流行,美国联邦紧急豁免允许肾脏医疗服务提供者(肾脏科医生和高级医疗服务提供者)以远程医疗会诊取代面对面的中心内血液透析会诊。我们研究了肾脏医疗服务提供者的就诊频率和住院情况是否与血液透析护理中使用远程医疗有关。我们研究了中心内血液透析期间远程医疗的使用、肾脏保健提供者每月探视透析患者四次或四次以上的频率与住院之间的关联。我们还研究了在较偏远地区的机构中,远程医疗的使用与探视频率之间的关系是否有所不同。多变量回归模型调整了患者、医生、地理位置和透析机构的特征,以及大流行前肾脏护理提供者在各机构为患者看病的频率。我们重点关注了那些通过在之前的报销单上使用远程医疗修饰符来证明自己知道如何为远程医疗就诊计费的肾脏医疗服务提供者。结果我们确定了 1881 名在 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 6 月期间为患者看病并明确使用远程医疗的医疗服务提供者。在调整后的模型中,医疗机构远程医疗使用率绝对值高出 35%(代表一个标准差差异),则四次或四次以上就诊率高出 1.4%(发病率比 (IRR) 1.014;95% 置信区间 1.007-1.022)。在距离医疗机构较远的地方,远程医疗的使用与就诊频率之间的关系更为密切(交互作用 p=0.01)。结论使用远程医疗护理接受中心内血液透析的患者与每月四次或四次以上的就诊频率略高有关,但与住院无关;在医疗服务提供者需要长途跋涉才能亲自就诊的地区,就诊频率与就诊频率的关系更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
Journal of The American Society of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
22.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
492
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN) stands as the preeminent kidney journal globally, offering an exceptional synthesis of cutting-edge basic research, clinical epidemiology, meta-analysis, and relevant editorial content. Representing a comprehensive resource, JASN encompasses clinical research, editorials distilling key findings, perspectives, and timely reviews. Editorials are skillfully crafted to elucidate the essential insights of the parent article, while JASN actively encourages the submission of Letters to the Editor discussing recently published articles. The reviews featured in JASN are consistently erudite and comprehensive, providing thorough coverage of respective fields. Since its inception in July 1990, JASN has been a monthly publication. JASN publishes original research reports and editorial content across a spectrum of basic and clinical science relevant to the broad discipline of nephrology. Topics covered include renal cell biology, developmental biology of the kidney, genetics of kidney disease, cell and transport physiology, hemodynamics and vascular regulation, mechanisms of blood pressure regulation, renal immunology, kidney pathology, pathophysiology of kidney diseases, nephrolithiasis, clinical nephrology (including dialysis and transplantation), and hypertension. Furthermore, articles addressing healthcare policy and care delivery issues relevant to nephrology are warmly welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Testing Interventions that Address Kidney Health Disparities. Better Dialysis Care in the United States Requires New Payment Policy: No Patient Left Behind. Bundle Fix?: We Need an Act of Congress. Optimizing Quality Care within a Bundled Framework. Toward Noninvasive Biomarkers of Renal Senescence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1