Baricitinib dose reduction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving sustained disease control: Final results from the RA-BEYOND study.

Christopher J Edwards,Gerhard Krönke,Jérôme Avouac,Zhanguo Li,Fabrizio Conti,Alejandro Balsa,Daojun Mo,Ewa Haladyj,Peter Fischer,Masaru Tanaka,Yasushi Takita,Kohei Hagimori,Tsutomu Takeuchi
{"title":"Baricitinib dose reduction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving sustained disease control: Final results from the RA-BEYOND study.","authors":"Christopher J Edwards,Gerhard Krönke,Jérôme Avouac,Zhanguo Li,Fabrizio Conti,Alejandro Balsa,Daojun Mo,Ewa Haladyj,Peter Fischer,Masaru Tanaka,Yasushi Takita,Kohei Hagimori,Tsutomu Takeuchi","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-0906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nThis study examines the impact of dose step-down in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who achieved sustained disease control with baricitinib 4-mg once-daily up to 96-weeks.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nPatients who completed a baricitinib phase 3 study could enter a long-term extension (LTE). In the LTE, patients who received baricitinib 4-mg for ≥15 months and maintained clinical disease activity index (CDAI) low disease activity (LDA) or remission (REM) were blindly randomized to continue 4-mg or taper to 2-mg. If needed, 2-mg treated patients could be rescued to 4-mg, and 4-mg treated patients could be rescued by adding or increasing conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Efficacy and safety were assessed through 96-weeks. Non-responder imputation, considering rescued or discontinued patients as non-responders, was used for CDAI response analyses.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAt 96-weeks, most patients maintained LDA in both 2-mg and 4-mg arms, with a lower maintenance rate in 2-mg than 4-mg (NRI 59.9% and 70.2%, respectively). Patients maintained REM in 2-mg and 4-mg arms, 30.8% and 36.6% respectively. Rescue rates were 14.7% for baricitinib 4-mg and 22.5% for 2-mg. Of 112 patients who lost LDA in the 2-mg arm and rescued to 4-mg, 76.2% and 75.6% achieved LDA again at 12- and 24-weeks post-rescue.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nIn a randomized, blinded, phase 3 LTE study, maintenance of RA control following induction of sustained LDA/REM with baricitinib 4-mg was greater with continued 4-mg than after taper to 2-mg. Nonetheless, 76% of patients tapered to 2-mg could maintain LDA/REM or recapture with return to 4-mg if needed.","PeriodicalId":501812,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Rheumatology","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-0906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE This study examines the impact of dose step-down in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who achieved sustained disease control with baricitinib 4-mg once-daily up to 96-weeks. METHODS Patients who completed a baricitinib phase 3 study could enter a long-term extension (LTE). In the LTE, patients who received baricitinib 4-mg for ≥15 months and maintained clinical disease activity index (CDAI) low disease activity (LDA) or remission (REM) were blindly randomized to continue 4-mg or taper to 2-mg. If needed, 2-mg treated patients could be rescued to 4-mg, and 4-mg treated patients could be rescued by adding or increasing conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Efficacy and safety were assessed through 96-weeks. Non-responder imputation, considering rescued or discontinued patients as non-responders, was used for CDAI response analyses. RESULTS At 96-weeks, most patients maintained LDA in both 2-mg and 4-mg arms, with a lower maintenance rate in 2-mg than 4-mg (NRI 59.9% and 70.2%, respectively). Patients maintained REM in 2-mg and 4-mg arms, 30.8% and 36.6% respectively. Rescue rates were 14.7% for baricitinib 4-mg and 22.5% for 2-mg. Of 112 patients who lost LDA in the 2-mg arm and rescued to 4-mg, 76.2% and 75.6% achieved LDA again at 12- and 24-weeks post-rescue. CONCLUSION In a randomized, blinded, phase 3 LTE study, maintenance of RA control following induction of sustained LDA/REM with baricitinib 4-mg was greater with continued 4-mg than after taper to 2-mg. Nonetheless, 76% of patients tapered to 2-mg could maintain LDA/REM or recapture with return to 4-mg if needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Baricitinib剂量减少类风湿性关节炎患者实现持续疾病控制:RA-BEYOND研究的最终结果
方法完成巴利替尼3期研究的患者可进入长期延长期(LTE)。在LTE中,接受巴利昔替尼4毫克治疗≥15个月并保持临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)低疾病活动(LDA)或缓解(REM)的患者被盲法随机分配到继续接受4毫克治疗或减量至2毫克治疗。如有需要,接受2毫克治疗的患者可转为接受4毫克治疗,接受4毫克治疗的患者可通过添加或增加常规合成改善病情抗风湿药物进行治疗。疗效和安全性评估为期 96 周。结果96周时,大多数患者在2毫克和4毫克治疗组都维持了LDA,但2毫克的维持率低于4毫克(NRI分别为59.9%和70.2%)。在 2 毫克和 4 毫克治疗组中,患者的 REM 维持率分别为 30.8% 和 36.6%。巴利昔尼 4 毫克和 2 毫克的抢救率分别为 14.7% 和 22.5%。 在 2 毫克组失去 LDA 并抢救至 4 毫克组的 112 名患者中,分别有 76.2% 和 75.6% 的患者在抢救后 12 周和 24 周再次获得 LDA。结论 在一项随机、盲法、3 期 LTE 研究中,使用巴利昔尼 4 毫克诱导持续 LDA/REM 后,继续使用 4 毫克比减量至 2 毫克更能维持 RA 控制。 尽管如此,76% 减量至 2 毫克的患者仍能维持 LDA/REM,或在必要时重返 4 毫克。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Osteolysis After Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis in Systemic Sclerosis: A Case Series. Real-world diagnostic performance of OMERACT salivary gland ultrasound in patients evaluated for sicca symptoms. Comparative risk of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures according to exposure to two groups of biologics in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of rituximab to predict early B-cell repopulation in children with inflammatory diseases. Differences in Self-Reported Medication Nonadherence and its Drivers in Young Adults versus Older Adults with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1