Prediction of tissue and clinical thrombectomy outcome in acute ischaemic stroke using deep learning

IF 10.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain Pub Date : 2025-01-19 DOI:10.1093/brain/awaf013
Marie-Sophie von Braun, Kristin Starke, Lucas Peter, Daniel Kürsten, Florian Welle, Hans Ralf Schneider, Max Wawrzyniak, Daniel P O Kaiser, Gordian Prasse, Cindy Richter, Elias Kellner, Marco Reisert, Julian Klingbeil, Anika Stockert, Karl-Titus Hoffmann, Gerik Scheuermann, Christina Gillmann, Dorothee Saur
{"title":"Prediction of tissue and clinical thrombectomy outcome in acute ischaemic stroke using deep learning","authors":"Marie-Sophie von Braun, Kristin Starke, Lucas Peter, Daniel Kürsten, Florian Welle, Hans Ralf Schneider, Max Wawrzyniak, Daniel P O Kaiser, Gordian Prasse, Cindy Richter, Elias Kellner, Marco Reisert, Julian Klingbeil, Anika Stockert, Karl-Titus Hoffmann, Gerik Scheuermann, Christina Gillmann, Dorothee Saur","doi":"10.1093/brain/awaf013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advent of endovascular thrombectomy has significantly improved outcomes for stroke patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion, yet individual benefits can vary widely. As demand for thrombectomy rises and geographic disparities in stroke care access persist, there is a growing need for predictive models that quantify individual benefits. However, current imaging methods for estimating outcomes may not fully capture the dynamic nature of cerebral ischemia and lack a patient-specific assessment of thrombectomy benefits. Our study introduces a deep learning approach to predict individual responses to thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients. The proposed models provide predictions for both tissue and clinical outcomes under two scenarios: one assuming successful reperfusion and another assuming unsuccessful reperfusion. The resulting simulations of penumbral salvage and difference in NIHSS at discharge quantify the potential individual benefits of the intervention. Our models were developed on an extensive dataset from routine stroke care, which included 405 ischemic stroke patients who underwent thrombectomy. We used acute data for training (n = 304), including multimodal CT imaging and clinical characteristics, along with post hoc markers like thrombectomy success, final infarct localization, and NIHSS at discharge. We benchmarked our tissue outcome predictions under the observed reperfusion scenario against a thresholding-based clinical method and a generalised linear model. Our deep-learning model showed significant superiority, with a mean Dice score of 0.48 on internal (n = 50) and 0.52 on external (n = 51) test data, versus 0.26/0.36 and 0.34/0.35 for the baselines, respectively. The NIHSS sum score prediction achieved median absolute errors of 1.5 NIHSS points on the internal test dataset and 3.0 NIHSS points on the external test dataset, outperforming other machine learning models. By predicting the patient-specific response to thrombectomy for both tissue and clinical outcomes, our approach offers an innovative biomarker that captures the dynamics of cerebral ischemia. We believe this method holds significant potential to enhance personalised therapeutic strategies and to facilitate efficient resource allocation in acute stroke care.","PeriodicalId":9063,"journal":{"name":"Brain","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaf013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advent of endovascular thrombectomy has significantly improved outcomes for stroke patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion, yet individual benefits can vary widely. As demand for thrombectomy rises and geographic disparities in stroke care access persist, there is a growing need for predictive models that quantify individual benefits. However, current imaging methods for estimating outcomes may not fully capture the dynamic nature of cerebral ischemia and lack a patient-specific assessment of thrombectomy benefits. Our study introduces a deep learning approach to predict individual responses to thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients. The proposed models provide predictions for both tissue and clinical outcomes under two scenarios: one assuming successful reperfusion and another assuming unsuccessful reperfusion. The resulting simulations of penumbral salvage and difference in NIHSS at discharge quantify the potential individual benefits of the intervention. Our models were developed on an extensive dataset from routine stroke care, which included 405 ischemic stroke patients who underwent thrombectomy. We used acute data for training (n = 304), including multimodal CT imaging and clinical characteristics, along with post hoc markers like thrombectomy success, final infarct localization, and NIHSS at discharge. We benchmarked our tissue outcome predictions under the observed reperfusion scenario against a thresholding-based clinical method and a generalised linear model. Our deep-learning model showed significant superiority, with a mean Dice score of 0.48 on internal (n = 50) and 0.52 on external (n = 51) test data, versus 0.26/0.36 and 0.34/0.35 for the baselines, respectively. The NIHSS sum score prediction achieved median absolute errors of 1.5 NIHSS points on the internal test dataset and 3.0 NIHSS points on the external test dataset, outperforming other machine learning models. By predicting the patient-specific response to thrombectomy for both tissue and clinical outcomes, our approach offers an innovative biomarker that captures the dynamics of cerebral ischemia. We believe this method holds significant potential to enhance personalised therapeutic strategies and to facilitate efficient resource allocation in acute stroke care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用深度学习预测急性缺血性脑卒中的组织和临床取栓效果
血管内取栓术的出现显著改善了脑卒中颅内大血管闭塞患者的预后,但个体获益差异很大。随着血栓切除术需求的增加和卒中治疗的地域差异持续存在,对量化个体获益的预测模型的需求日益增长。然而,目前用于评估预后的成像方法可能无法完全捕捉脑缺血的动态特性,并且缺乏对取栓益处的患者特异性评估。我们的研究引入了一种深度学习方法来预测急性缺血性脑卒中患者对血栓切除术的个体反应。所提出的模型提供了两种情况下的组织和临床结果预测:一种假设再灌注成功,另一种假设再灌注失败。由此产生的模拟半影挽救和出院时NIHSS的差异量化了干预的潜在个人益处。我们的模型是在常规卒中护理的广泛数据集上开发的,其中包括405例接受血栓切除术的缺血性卒中患者。我们使用急性数据进行训练(n = 304),包括多模态CT成像和临床特征,以及事后标记,如血栓切除成功、最终梗死定位和出院时的NIHSS。我们根据基于阈值的临床方法和广义线性模型对观察到的再灌注情景下的组织结果预测进行基准测试。我们的深度学习模型显示出显著的优势,内部(n = 50)和外部(n = 51)测试数据的平均Dice得分分别为0.48和0.52,而基线分别为0.26/0.36和0.34/0.35。NIHSS总和分数预测在内部测试数据集上实现了1.5 NIHSS点的绝对误差中位数,在外部测试数据集上实现了3.0 NIHSS点的绝对误差中位数,优于其他机器学习模型。通过预测患者对取栓的组织和临床结果的特异性反应,我们的方法提供了一种创新的生物标志物,可以捕捉脑缺血的动态。我们相信,这种方法具有显著的潜力,以提高个性化的治疗策略,并促进有效的资源分配在急性中风护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain
Brain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain, a journal focused on clinical neurology and translational neuroscience, has been publishing landmark papers since 1878. The journal aims to expand its scope by including studies that shed light on disease mechanisms and conducting innovative clinical trials for brain disorders. With a wide range of topics covered, the Editorial Board represents the international readership and diverse coverage of the journal. Accepted articles are promptly posted online, typically within a few weeks of acceptance. As of 2022, Brain holds an impressive impact factor of 14.5, according to the Journal Citation Reports.
期刊最新文献
Plasma phosphorylated tau217 strongly associates with memory deficits in the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum Correction to: Bidirectional gut-to-brain and brain-to-gut propagation of synucleinopathy in non-human primates. Reshaping computational neuropsychiatry beyond synaptopathy. Trigeminal nerve microstructure is linked with neuroinflammation and brainstem activity in migraine. Transthyretin variants impact blood–nerve barrier and neuroinflammation in amyloidotic neuropathy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1