Testing an integrated approach for managing roof rats in citrus orchards

IF 3.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Pest Management Science Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1002/ps.8672
Roger A. Baldwin, Ryan Meinerz, Aaron B. Shiels
{"title":"Testing an integrated approach for managing roof rats in citrus orchards","authors":"Roger A. Baldwin, Ryan Meinerz, Aaron B. Shiels","doi":"10.1002/ps.8672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundRoof rats (<jats:italic>Rattus rattus</jats:italic>) are a substantial pest throughout citrus crops, yet little is known about efficacious, cost‐effective strategies to manage this rodent. Therefore, we developed two integrated pest management (IPM) programs that incorporated elevated bait stations containing diphacinone‐treated oats and trapping, and we compared those programs to a bait‐station only approach to determine which strategies were most practical for the management of roof rats in citrus orchards.ResultsBait applications substantially reduced rat activity within orchards. However, our initial IPM approach that used a combination of baiting, snap trapping and Goodnature® A24 traps were not successful at keeping rats from rapidly repopulating. A second IPM strategy that relied on baiting and more extensive snap trapping was effective at reducing rat activity up to, and likely beyond, a 6‐month treatment period. Although baiting by itself was less expensive than IPM plots, the difference in cost between baiting and the IPM approach that used only baiting and snap trapping should be minimal during long‐term management programs.ConclusionThe high efficacy of a management program that incorporates an initial bait application, followed by a long‐term snap‐trapping program, should yield effective management of roof rats in citrus orchards. © 2025 The Author(s). <jats:italic>Pest Management Science</jats:italic> published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.","PeriodicalId":218,"journal":{"name":"Pest Management Science","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pest Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.8672","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundRoof rats (Rattus rattus) are a substantial pest throughout citrus crops, yet little is known about efficacious, cost‐effective strategies to manage this rodent. Therefore, we developed two integrated pest management (IPM) programs that incorporated elevated bait stations containing diphacinone‐treated oats and trapping, and we compared those programs to a bait‐station only approach to determine which strategies were most practical for the management of roof rats in citrus orchards.ResultsBait applications substantially reduced rat activity within orchards. However, our initial IPM approach that used a combination of baiting, snap trapping and Goodnature® A24 traps were not successful at keeping rats from rapidly repopulating. A second IPM strategy that relied on baiting and more extensive snap trapping was effective at reducing rat activity up to, and likely beyond, a 6‐month treatment period. Although baiting by itself was less expensive than IPM plots, the difference in cost between baiting and the IPM approach that used only baiting and snap trapping should be minimal during long‐term management programs.ConclusionThe high efficacy of a management program that incorporates an initial bait application, followed by a long‐term snap‐trapping program, should yield effective management of roof rats in citrus orchards. © 2025 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
柑橘园顶鼠综合治理方法试验
背景屋顶鼠(Rattus rattus)是柑橘作物中的一种主要害虫,但人们对管理这种啮齿类动物的有效、成本效益高的策略知之甚少。因此,我们制定了两个害虫综合治理(IPM)计划,其中包括高架诱饵站(内含经二氟苯丙酮处理的燕麦)和诱捕,并将这些计划与仅使用诱饵站的方法进行了比较,以确定哪种策略对柑橘园中屋顶鼠的治理最为实用。然而,我们最初采用的综合虫害综合治理方法结合使用了诱饵、快速捕鼠器和 Goodnature® A24 捕鼠器,但未能成功阻止老鼠的快速繁殖。第二种虫害综合防治策略依靠投放诱饵和更广泛的快速诱捕,有效地减少了老鼠的活动,并可能在 6 个月的防治期之后仍有效。虽然投饵本身的成本低于 IPM 地块,但在长期管理计划中,投饵与仅使用投饵和快速诱捕的 IPM 方法之间的成本差异应该很小。© 2025 作者简介害虫管理科学》由 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 代表化学工业协会出版。本文由美国政府雇员撰写,其作品在美国属于公共领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pest Management Science
Pest Management Science 农林科学-昆虫学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
9.80%
发文量
553
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Pest Management Science is the international journal of research and development in crop protection and pest control. Since its launch in 1970, the journal has become the premier forum for papers on the discovery, application, and impact on the environment of products and strategies designed for pest management. Published for SCI by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
期刊最新文献
Different nontarget‐site mechanisms underlie resistance to dicamba and 2,4‐D in an Amaranthus tuberculatus population Container emptying alone falls short: mechanical egg removal enhances Aedes aegypti management. Influence of the 'painless' TRP channel on temperature-dependent escape and humidity-related pupation in Bactrocera dorsalis larvae. Evaluation of GS-omega/kappa-Hxtx-Hv1a and Bt toxins against Bt-resistant and -susceptible strains of Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) and Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) Bio-based two-dimensional amphiphile with hierarchical self-assembly for enhancing pesticide utilization and reducing environmental risks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1