Use of Hallway Beds, Radiology Studies, and Patients in Pain on Arrival to the Emergency Department Are Associated With Patient Experience.

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Annals of emergency medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.11.020
Diane Kuhn,Peter S Pang,Olena Mazurenko,Nancy K Glober,Thomas A Lardaro,Xiaochun Li,Christopher A Harle,Paul I Musey
{"title":"Use of Hallway Beds, Radiology Studies, and Patients in Pain on Arrival to the Emergency Department Are Associated With Patient Experience.","authors":"Diane Kuhn,Peter S Pang,Olena Mazurenko,Nancy K Glober,Thomas A Lardaro,Xiaochun Li,Christopher A Harle,Paul I Musey","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.11.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STUDY OBJECTIVE\r\nPatient experience is an essential measure of patient-centered emergency care. However, emergency department (ED) patient experience scores may be influenced by patient demographics as well as clinical and operational characteristics unrelated to actual patient-centeredness of care. This study aimed to determine whether there are characteristics associated with patient experience scores that have not yet been proposed for risk adjustment by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis is a cross-sectional study of patient visits for 13 EDs across a regional health system from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. We used a multivariable mixed-effects regression with physician-site random effects to examine the relationship between patient, clinical, and operational characteristics and ED patient experience scores. The dependent variable was a patient's likelihood to recommend rating (0-10 scale), treated as a continuous variable. The independent variables included patient (age, race, gender, ethnicity, interpreter need, and payer type), clinical (radiology and laboratory studies, opioid administration, patient acuity, and initial pain score), and operational characteristics (door-to-doc times, hallway bed placement, and National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale [NEDOCS] level).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 58,622 unique patient visits were included in the analysis. The patient experience survey response rate was 7.1% of discharged ED patients during the study period. Black or African American patients, those with Medicaid insurance, and adults aged younger than 40 years were underrepresented relative to the expected proportions based on population data. Several clinical and operational characteristics were significantly associated with experience ratings, including hallway bed placement (-0.38 [95% confidence interval, -0.53 to -0.23]), receiving radiology studies (0.27 [0.20 to 0.35]), initial pain scores (-0.08 [-0.09 to -0.06]), and NEDOCS level.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nWe found several clinical and operational characteristics associated with patient experience scores, which CMS does not currently use for risk adjustment. Our findings raise concerns that there are elements of care associated with patients' overall experience ratings which have an unclear relationship with patient-centered constructs such as communication and coordination of care.","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.11.020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE Patient experience is an essential measure of patient-centered emergency care. However, emergency department (ED) patient experience scores may be influenced by patient demographics as well as clinical and operational characteristics unrelated to actual patient-centeredness of care. This study aimed to determine whether there are characteristics associated with patient experience scores that have not yet been proposed for risk adjustment by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). METHODS This is a cross-sectional study of patient visits for 13 EDs across a regional health system from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. We used a multivariable mixed-effects regression with physician-site random effects to examine the relationship between patient, clinical, and operational characteristics and ED patient experience scores. The dependent variable was a patient's likelihood to recommend rating (0-10 scale), treated as a continuous variable. The independent variables included patient (age, race, gender, ethnicity, interpreter need, and payer type), clinical (radiology and laboratory studies, opioid administration, patient acuity, and initial pain score), and operational characteristics (door-to-doc times, hallway bed placement, and National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale [NEDOCS] level). RESULTS A total of 58,622 unique patient visits were included in the analysis. The patient experience survey response rate was 7.1% of discharged ED patients during the study period. Black or African American patients, those with Medicaid insurance, and adults aged younger than 40 years were underrepresented relative to the expected proportions based on population data. Several clinical and operational characteristics were significantly associated with experience ratings, including hallway bed placement (-0.38 [95% confidence interval, -0.53 to -0.23]), receiving radiology studies (0.27 [0.20 to 0.35]), initial pain scores (-0.08 [-0.09 to -0.06]), and NEDOCS level. CONCLUSION We found several clinical and operational characteristics associated with patient experience scores, which CMS does not currently use for risk adjustment. Our findings raise concerns that there are elements of care associated with patients' overall experience ratings which have an unclear relationship with patient-centered constructs such as communication and coordination of care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走廊床的使用、放射学研究和到达急诊科时疼痛的患者与患者的经历有关。
研究目的:患者体验是以患者为中心的急诊护理的重要指标。然而,急诊科(ED)患者体验得分可能受到患者人口统计学以及与实际以患者为中心的护理无关的临床和操作特征的影响。本研究旨在确定是否存在与患者经验评分相关的特征,这些特征尚未被医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)提出用于风险调整。方法:这是一项横断面研究,研究了从2022年1月1日到2023年12月31日,整个地区卫生系统中13个急诊科的患者就诊情况。我们使用多变量混合效应回归和医生现场随机效应来检验患者、临床和手术特征与急诊科患者体验评分之间的关系。因变量是患者推荐评分的可能性(0-10分),作为连续变量处理。自变量包括患者(年龄、种族、性别、民族、翻译需求和付款人类型)、临床(放射学和实验室研究、阿片类药物给药、患者视力和初始疼痛评分)和操作特征(从门到医生的时间、走廊床位的放置和国家急诊科过度拥挤程度[NEDOCS]水平)。结果共有58,622例独立患者就诊被纳入分析。研究期间出院急诊科患者的患者体验调查应答率为7.1%。与基于人口数据的预期比例相比,黑人或非裔美国人患者、有医疗补助保险的患者以及年龄小于40岁的成年人的比例偏低。一些临床和操作特征与经验评分显著相关,包括走廊床放置(-0.38[95%置信区间,-0.53至-0.23]),接受放射学检查(0.27[0.20至0.35]),初始疼痛评分(-0.08[-0.09至-0.06])和NEDOCS水平。结论:我们发现了一些与患者体验评分相关的临床和操作特征,而CMS目前并未将其用于风险调整。我们的研究结果引起了人们的关注,即与患者整体体验评级相关的护理要素与以患者为中心的结构(如护理的沟通和协调)之间存在不明确的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of emergency medicine
Annals of emergency medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
819
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Emergency Medicine, the official journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians, is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to improving the quality of care by publishing the highest quality science for emergency medicine and related medical specialties. Annals publishes original research, clinical reports, opinion, and educational information related to the practice, teaching, and research of emergency medicine. In addition to general emergency medicine topics, Annals regularly publishes articles on out-of-hospital emergency medical services, pediatric emergency medicine, injury and disease prevention, health policy and ethics, disaster management, toxicology, and related topics.
期刊最新文献
Adolescent Girl With Lower Abdominal Pain. An Erythematous Plaque on Sole of the Foot. Cybersecurity in Virtual Observation Units. Dyspnea in a Patient With Clear Lungs. Elderly Man With Abdominal Pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1