Pitch Types and Their Influence on Elbow Varus Torque and Spin Rate in Professional Baseball Pitchers.

Alexander J Hodakowski,Brittany Dowling,John T Streepy,Bjorn Olmanson,Logan Schmitt,Marc J Richard,Nikhil N Verma,Grant E Garrigues
{"title":"Pitch Types and Their Influence on Elbow Varus Torque and Spin Rate in Professional Baseball Pitchers.","authors":"Alexander J Hodakowski,Brittany Dowling,John T Streepy,Bjorn Olmanson,Logan Schmitt,Marc J Richard,Nikhil N Verma,Grant E Garrigues","doi":"10.1177/03635465241309316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nElbow injuries are prevalent among professional baseball pitchers as nearly 25% undergo ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction. Pitch type, ball velocity, and spin rate have been previously hypothesized to influence elbow varus torque and subsequent risk of injury, but existing research is inconclusive.\r\n\r\nPURPOSE\r\nTo examine elbow varus torque, cumulative torque, and loading rate within professional pitchers throwing fastball, curveball, change-up, and slider pitches, as well as to identify potential influences of ball spin on the elbow.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nDescriptive laboratory study.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA total of 31 professional pitchers (mean height, 189.0 ± 5.7 cm; mean weight, 91.7 ± 8.2 kg) were analyzed using motion capture (480 Hz) and TrackMan while throwing a full bullpen of pitches consisting of fastballs, curveballs, change-ups, and sliders. Elbow varus torque, loading rate, cumulative torque, and spin rate were calculated and analyzed using linear regression to establish within-player and mixed-effects models to establish between-player differences in pitch types.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAnalyzed by individual pitcher, fastballs exhibited significantly higher mean ball velocity and elbow varus torque (40.4 ± 0.6 m/s; 90.1 ± 3.5 N·m) (all P < .001) and peak elbow varus torque compared with curveballs (33.4 ± 0.6 m/s; 87.5 ± 2.7 N·m), change-ups (36.4 ± 0.6 m/s; 81.3 ± 2.4 N·m), and sliders (36.2 ± 0.7 m/s; 87.7 ± 2.7 N·m). Fastball pitches had a significantly greater cumulative elbow varus torque and loading rate compared to all pitch types within a pitcher (P < .001). Despite the lower peak elbow varus torque and loading rate, the change-up pitch had the second highest cumulative torque. Curveballs were found to have the lowest cumulative elbow varus torque. No significant relationship was found between spin rates and elbow varus torque across pitch types.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nFastballs produced the greatest ball velocity, peak elbow varus torque, loading rate, and cumulative torque among the 4 pitch types analyzed in professional pitchers. Although spin rate has become a popular topic in modern pitching strategies and analyses, this study found no significant relationship between spin rate and elbow varus torque across pitch types, suggesting that spin rate alone may not be a reliable predictor of elbow torque or injury.\r\n\r\nCLINICAL RELEVANCE\r\nThese findings suggest that pitch type, rather than spin rate, should be considered when assessing risk of elbow injuries in professional pitchers.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"74 1","pages":"3635465241309316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241309316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Elbow injuries are prevalent among professional baseball pitchers as nearly 25% undergo ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction. Pitch type, ball velocity, and spin rate have been previously hypothesized to influence elbow varus torque and subsequent risk of injury, but existing research is inconclusive. PURPOSE To examine elbow varus torque, cumulative torque, and loading rate within professional pitchers throwing fastball, curveball, change-up, and slider pitches, as well as to identify potential influences of ball spin on the elbow. STUDY DESIGN Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS A total of 31 professional pitchers (mean height, 189.0 ± 5.7 cm; mean weight, 91.7 ± 8.2 kg) were analyzed using motion capture (480 Hz) and TrackMan while throwing a full bullpen of pitches consisting of fastballs, curveballs, change-ups, and sliders. Elbow varus torque, loading rate, cumulative torque, and spin rate were calculated and analyzed using linear regression to establish within-player and mixed-effects models to establish between-player differences in pitch types. RESULTS Analyzed by individual pitcher, fastballs exhibited significantly higher mean ball velocity and elbow varus torque (40.4 ± 0.6 m/s; 90.1 ± 3.5 N·m) (all P < .001) and peak elbow varus torque compared with curveballs (33.4 ± 0.6 m/s; 87.5 ± 2.7 N·m), change-ups (36.4 ± 0.6 m/s; 81.3 ± 2.4 N·m), and sliders (36.2 ± 0.7 m/s; 87.7 ± 2.7 N·m). Fastball pitches had a significantly greater cumulative elbow varus torque and loading rate compared to all pitch types within a pitcher (P < .001). Despite the lower peak elbow varus torque and loading rate, the change-up pitch had the second highest cumulative torque. Curveballs were found to have the lowest cumulative elbow varus torque. No significant relationship was found between spin rates and elbow varus torque across pitch types. CONCLUSION Fastballs produced the greatest ball velocity, peak elbow varus torque, loading rate, and cumulative torque among the 4 pitch types analyzed in professional pitchers. Although spin rate has become a popular topic in modern pitching strategies and analyses, this study found no significant relationship between spin rate and elbow varus torque across pitch types, suggesting that spin rate alone may not be a reliable predictor of elbow torque or injury. CLINICAL RELEVANCE These findings suggest that pitch type, rather than spin rate, should be considered when assessing risk of elbow injuries in professional pitchers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投球类型及其对职业棒球投手肘关节内翻力矩和旋转速率的影响。
背景:在职业棒球投手中,弓伤很普遍,近25%的人接受过尺侧副韧带重建。球场类型、球速度和旋转速度先前被假设会影响肘关节内翻扭矩和随后的损伤风险,但现有的研究尚无定论。目的研究职业投手投快速球、曲球、变速球和滑球时肘关节内翻扭矩、累积扭矩和负荷率,并确定球旋转对肘关节的潜在影响。研究设计描述性实验室研究。方法共31例职业投手(平均身高189.0±5.7 cm;平均体重(91.7±8.2 kg),在投掷包括快速球、曲线球、变速球和滑球在内的全牛棚投球时,使用动作捕捉(480 Hz)和TrackMan分析。计算并分析肘关节内翻扭矩、加载率、累积扭矩和旋转速率,采用线性回归建立球员内部和混合效应模型,以确定球员之间在音调类型上的差异。结果从投手个人角度分析,快球的平均球速度和肘关节内翻力矩(40.4±0.6 m/s)显著高于快球;90.1±3.5 N·m)(均P < 0.001),弯头内翻扭矩峰值为33.4±0.6 m/s;87.5±2.7 N·m),变化(36.4±0.6 m/s;(81.3±2.4 N·m),滑块(36.2±0.7 m/s;(87.7±2.7 N·m)。与投手的所有投球类型相比,快速球的累积肘关节内翻扭矩和负荷率明显更高(P < 0.001)。尽管弯头内翻扭矩峰值和加载速率较低,但变速节距的累积扭矩第二高。曲球的累积肘关节内翻扭矩最小。旋转速率和肘关节内翻扭矩之间没有明显的关系。结论在分析的4种投球类型中,快速球的投球速度、肘关节内翻扭矩峰值、载荷率和累积扭矩最大。尽管旋转速度已经成为现代投球策略和分析的热门话题,但本研究发现旋转速度和肘关节内翻扭矩之间没有显著关系,这表明旋转速度本身可能不是肘关节扭矩或损伤的可靠预测指标。临床相关性这些发现表明,在评估职业投手肘部损伤风险时,应考虑投球类型,而不是旋转速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using a Residual Pivot Shift as the Indication to Perform a Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis During ACL Reconstruction Using Autologous Hamstring Grafts Is Associated With Improved Surgical Outcomes: A Retrospective Review of 4755 Cases. Comparison Between Performance of Disease-Specific and Region-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Adolescents After Patellofemoral Stabilization Surgery: Data From the JUPITER Cohort. Toward an Integrated Perspective Regarding Clinically Significant Labral Injuries in Overhead Throwing Athletes: Form Follows Function Where Sex Matters for Perioperative and Postoperative Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes: A Systematic Review of MOON Literature Preoperative Nonopioid Analgesia Reduces Postoperative Opioid Consumption After Arthroscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1