Performance Comparison of Loop Source and Grounded-Wire Source for Shallow Refined TEM Detection

IF 3.4 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS IEEE Access Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3527870
Zhengyu Xu;Guofeng Zhao;Jiangying Peng;Xiao Ma;Wei Liu
{"title":"Performance Comparison of Loop Source and Grounded-Wire Source for Shallow Refined TEM Detection","authors":"Zhengyu Xu;Guofeng Zhao;Jiangying Peng;Xiao Ma;Wei Liu","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3527870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Loop-source transient electromagnetic method (TEM) and grounded-wire-source TEM are two of the most popular methods in geological electromagnetic detection. Advances in power electronics have made it possible to achieve high magnetic moments by transmitting large current pulses through small excitation coils, enabling the use of independent loop sources as magnetic dipoles in active detection techniques. The independent loop source, by overcoming the attenuation of the magnetic field caused by distance, becomes an efficient and low-cost tool for shallow detection. Both the independent loop source and the grounded-wire source share similarities in detection principles and scanning modes. This paper discusses the merits and shortcomings of the loop source and grounded-wire source for shallow, multiscale refined detection. The three-dimensional model is established and the electromagnetic response characteristics are compared by COMSOL finite element simulation software. Additionally, the influence of anomalous burial depth, offset distance, and measurement height on the detection results of these two near-source methods are thoroughly discussed. Finally, it is explained by the field measurement results. The comparison of simulation and experimental results shows that the loop-source TEM is more suitable for shallow refined detection in terms of response quality and construction efficiency.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"13 ","pages":"9450-9461"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10835096","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10835096/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Loop-source transient electromagnetic method (TEM) and grounded-wire-source TEM are two of the most popular methods in geological electromagnetic detection. Advances in power electronics have made it possible to achieve high magnetic moments by transmitting large current pulses through small excitation coils, enabling the use of independent loop sources as magnetic dipoles in active detection techniques. The independent loop source, by overcoming the attenuation of the magnetic field caused by distance, becomes an efficient and low-cost tool for shallow detection. Both the independent loop source and the grounded-wire source share similarities in detection principles and scanning modes. This paper discusses the merits and shortcomings of the loop source and grounded-wire source for shallow, multiscale refined detection. The three-dimensional model is established and the electromagnetic response characteristics are compared by COMSOL finite element simulation software. Additionally, the influence of anomalous burial depth, offset distance, and measurement height on the detection results of these two near-source methods are thoroughly discussed. Finally, it is explained by the field measurement results. The comparison of simulation and experimental results shows that the loop-source TEM is more suitable for shallow refined detection in terms of response quality and construction efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
浅层精细TEM探测中环路源与接地线源的性能比较
环源瞬变电磁法和接地线源瞬变电磁法是地质电磁探测中最常用的两种方法。电力电子技术的进步使得通过小励磁线圈传输大电流脉冲来实现高磁矩成为可能,从而可以在主动探测技术中使用独立的环路源作为磁偶极子。独立环路源克服了距离引起的磁场衰减,成为一种高效、低成本的浅层探测工具。独立环路源和接地线源在检测原理和扫描方式上有相似之处。本文讨论了浅层多尺度精细检测中环路源和接地线源的优缺点。建立三维模型,利用COMSOL有限元仿真软件对电磁响应特性进行比较。此外,还详细讨论了异常埋深、偏移距离和测量高度对两种近源方法探测结果的影响。最后,用现场实测结果进行了说明。仿真结果与实验结果的对比表明,环源瞬变电磁法在响应质量和施工效率方面更适合于浅层精细探测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Access
IEEE Access COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest. IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on: Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals. Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering. Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques. Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board IEEE Access™ Editorial Board Corrections to “The Recent Technologies to Curb the Second-Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic” Corrections to “Decentralized Asynchronous Formation Planning of Multirotor Aerial Vehicles in Dynamic Environments Using Flexible Formation Graphs and Tight Trajectory Hulls” Study on the Motion Patterns of Nested Test Cabin and Its Shock Response Spectrum Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1