Zhengyu Xu;Guofeng Zhao;Jiangying Peng;Xiao Ma;Wei Liu
{"title":"Performance Comparison of Loop Source and Grounded-Wire Source for Shallow Refined TEM Detection","authors":"Zhengyu Xu;Guofeng Zhao;Jiangying Peng;Xiao Ma;Wei Liu","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3527870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Loop-source transient electromagnetic method (TEM) and grounded-wire-source TEM are two of the most popular methods in geological electromagnetic detection. Advances in power electronics have made it possible to achieve high magnetic moments by transmitting large current pulses through small excitation coils, enabling the use of independent loop sources as magnetic dipoles in active detection techniques. The independent loop source, by overcoming the attenuation of the magnetic field caused by distance, becomes an efficient and low-cost tool for shallow detection. Both the independent loop source and the grounded-wire source share similarities in detection principles and scanning modes. This paper discusses the merits and shortcomings of the loop source and grounded-wire source for shallow, multiscale refined detection. The three-dimensional model is established and the electromagnetic response characteristics are compared by COMSOL finite element simulation software. Additionally, the influence of anomalous burial depth, offset distance, and measurement height on the detection results of these two near-source methods are thoroughly discussed. Finally, it is explained by the field measurement results. The comparison of simulation and experimental results shows that the loop-source TEM is more suitable for shallow refined detection in terms of response quality and construction efficiency.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"13 ","pages":"9450-9461"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10835096","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10835096/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Loop-source transient electromagnetic method (TEM) and grounded-wire-source TEM are two of the most popular methods in geological electromagnetic detection. Advances in power electronics have made it possible to achieve high magnetic moments by transmitting large current pulses through small excitation coils, enabling the use of independent loop sources as magnetic dipoles in active detection techniques. The independent loop source, by overcoming the attenuation of the magnetic field caused by distance, becomes an efficient and low-cost tool for shallow detection. Both the independent loop source and the grounded-wire source share similarities in detection principles and scanning modes. This paper discusses the merits and shortcomings of the loop source and grounded-wire source for shallow, multiscale refined detection. The three-dimensional model is established and the electromagnetic response characteristics are compared by COMSOL finite element simulation software. Additionally, the influence of anomalous burial depth, offset distance, and measurement height on the detection results of these two near-source methods are thoroughly discussed. Finally, it is explained by the field measurement results. The comparison of simulation and experimental results shows that the loop-source TEM is more suitable for shallow refined detection in terms of response quality and construction efficiency.
IEEE AccessCOMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍:
IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest.
IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on:
Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals.
Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering.
Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques.
Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.