{"title":"Recovering lead and sulfur from spent lead paste by molten salt electrolysis: a clean and sustainable lead and sulfur loop†","authors":"Hongya Wang, Fengyin Zhou, Bingbing Wang, Muya Cai, Jingjing Zhao, Xinyu Li, Yongxin Wu, Xiaowei Liu, Xiang Chen, Dihua Wang and Huayi Yin","doi":"10.1039/D4GC05220J","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The sulfur transfer is key to obtaining greenness of recycling spent lead paste (SLP) since conventional recycling methods always involve generating secondary wastes such as sulfur oxides (SO<small><sub><em>x</em></sub></small>), sulfates, and sulfides. To address these challenges, we propose a combined process in which the SLP is first converted into lead sulfide (PbS) by carbothermic reduction, and then the resultant PbS is split into liquid lead (Pb) and sulfur vapor (S<small><sub><em>x</em></sub></small>) by molten salt electrolysis (MSE). The faradaic efficiency of MSE reaches 92.29% with a Pb recovery rate of 97.85%, and the liquid Pb and gaseous S<small><sub><em>x</em></sub></small> are respectively discharged from the bottom and top of the cell to allow the reaction to happen continuously. Compared with traditional methods, over 98.85% of SO<small><sub>2</sub></small> emissions are reduced, and no sulfides and sulfates are generated. Furthermore, the energy consumption is only 0.32 kW h (kg-Pb)<small><sup>−1</sup></small>, which demonstrates a 67% reduction compared to mainstream recycling processes using a 50 g-scale electrolyzer. Overall, we offer a clean sulfur transfer route to reduce secondary wastes and energy consumption, which will benefit the recovery and utilization of various sulfate wastes and raw materials with low environmental footprints.</p>","PeriodicalId":78,"journal":{"name":"Green Chemistry","volume":" 4","pages":" 1089-1101"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/gc/d4gc05220j","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The sulfur transfer is key to obtaining greenness of recycling spent lead paste (SLP) since conventional recycling methods always involve generating secondary wastes such as sulfur oxides (SOx), sulfates, and sulfides. To address these challenges, we propose a combined process in which the SLP is first converted into lead sulfide (PbS) by carbothermic reduction, and then the resultant PbS is split into liquid lead (Pb) and sulfur vapor (Sx) by molten salt electrolysis (MSE). The faradaic efficiency of MSE reaches 92.29% with a Pb recovery rate of 97.85%, and the liquid Pb and gaseous Sx are respectively discharged from the bottom and top of the cell to allow the reaction to happen continuously. Compared with traditional methods, over 98.85% of SO2 emissions are reduced, and no sulfides and sulfates are generated. Furthermore, the energy consumption is only 0.32 kW h (kg-Pb)−1, which demonstrates a 67% reduction compared to mainstream recycling processes using a 50 g-scale electrolyzer. Overall, we offer a clean sulfur transfer route to reduce secondary wastes and energy consumption, which will benefit the recovery and utilization of various sulfate wastes and raw materials with low environmental footprints.
传统的废铅膏回收方法往往会产生硫氧化物、硫酸盐、硫化物等二次废弃物,因此硫转移是保证废铅膏绿色利用的关键。为了解决这些挑战,我们提出了一种组合工艺,首先通过碳热还原将SLP转化为硫化铅(PbS),然后通过熔盐电解(MSE)将生成的PbS分解为液态铅(Pb)和硫蒸气(Sx)。MSE的法拉第效率达到92.29%,Pb回收率为97.85%,且液态Pb和气态Sx分别从电池底部和顶部排出,使反应连续进行。与传统方法相比,减少了98.85%以上的SO2排放量,并且不产生硫化物和硫酸盐。此外,能耗仅为0.32 kW h (kg-Pb)−1,与使用50g级电解槽的主流回收工艺相比,能耗降低了67%。总的来说,我们提供了一条清洁的硫转移路线,减少了二次废物和能源消耗,这将有利于低环境足迹的各种硫酸盐废物和原材料的回收利用。
期刊介绍:
Green Chemistry is a journal that provides a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the development of alternative green and sustainable technologies. The scope of Green Chemistry is based on the definition proposed by Anastas and Warner (Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, P T Anastas and J C Warner, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998), which defines green chemistry as the utilisation of a set of principles that reduces or eliminates the use or generation of hazardous substances in the design, manufacture and application of chemical products. Green Chemistry aims to reduce the environmental impact of the chemical enterprise by developing a technology base that is inherently non-toxic to living things and the environment. The journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of research relating to this endeavor and publishes original and significant cutting-edge research that is likely to be of wide general appeal. For a work to be published, it must present a significant advance in green chemistry, including a comparison with existing methods and a demonstration of advantages over those methods.