Loneliness, social isolation, and living alone: a comprehensive systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of mortality risks in older adults

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1007/s40520-024-02925-1
Agni Nakou, Elena Dragioti, Nikolaos-Stefanos Bastas, Nektaria Zagorianakou, Varvara Kakaidi, Dimitrios Tsartsalis, Stefanos Mantzoukas, Fotios Tatsis, Nicola Veronese, Marco Solmi, Mary Gouva
{"title":"Loneliness, social isolation, and living alone: a comprehensive systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of mortality risks in older adults","authors":"Agni Nakou,&nbsp;Elena Dragioti,&nbsp;Nikolaos-Stefanos Bastas,&nbsp;Nektaria Zagorianakou,&nbsp;Varvara Kakaidi,&nbsp;Dimitrios Tsartsalis,&nbsp;Stefanos Mantzoukas,&nbsp;Fotios Tatsis,&nbsp;Nicola Veronese,&nbsp;Marco Solmi,&nbsp;Mary Gouva","doi":"10.1007/s40520-024-02925-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Loneliness, social isolation, and living alone are significant risk factors for mortality, particularly in older adults. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify their associations with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in older adults, broadening previous research by including more social factors. Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, APA PsycINFO, and CINAHL until December 31, 2023, following PRISMA 2020 and MOOSE guidelines. Studies included were prospective cohort or longitudinal studies examining the relationship between loneliness, social isolation, living alone, and mortality. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analyses used random-effects models with the Restricted Maximum Likelihood method. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses explored the relationships further. Of 11,964 identified studies, 86 met the inclusion criteria. Loneliness was associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.10–1.18), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 84.0%). Similar associations were found for social isolation (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.27–1.43) and living alone (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13–1.30). Subgroup analyses revealed variations based on factors like sex, age, region, chronic diseases, and study quality. Meta-regression identified longer follow-up, female sex, validated social network indices, adjustments for cognitive function, and study quality as significant predictors of mortality risks. These findings highlight the need for public health interventions to address these social factors and improve health outcomes in older adults. However, further research is needed due to variability and heterogeneity across studies. Also studying the cumulative effect of these factors on mortality risks will be of considerable interest.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-024-02925-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-024-02925-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Loneliness, social isolation, and living alone are significant risk factors for mortality, particularly in older adults. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify their associations with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in older adults, broadening previous research by including more social factors. Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, APA PsycINFO, and CINAHL until December 31, 2023, following PRISMA 2020 and MOOSE guidelines. Studies included were prospective cohort or longitudinal studies examining the relationship between loneliness, social isolation, living alone, and mortality. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analyses used random-effects models with the Restricted Maximum Likelihood method. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses explored the relationships further. Of 11,964 identified studies, 86 met the inclusion criteria. Loneliness was associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.10–1.18), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 84.0%). Similar associations were found for social isolation (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.27–1.43) and living alone (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13–1.30). Subgroup analyses revealed variations based on factors like sex, age, region, chronic diseases, and study quality. Meta-regression identified longer follow-up, female sex, validated social network indices, adjustments for cognitive function, and study quality as significant predictors of mortality risks. These findings highlight the need for public health interventions to address these social factors and improve health outcomes in older adults. However, further research is needed due to variability and heterogeneity across studies. Also studying the cumulative effect of these factors on mortality risks will be of considerable interest.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孤独、社会隔离和独居:老年人死亡风险的综合系统回顾、荟萃分析和荟萃回归
孤独、社会孤立和独居是导致死亡的重要风险因素,尤其是老年人。这项系统回顾和荟萃分析旨在量化它们与老年人全因死亡率和特定原因死亡率的关系,通过纳入更多的社会因素来扩大先前的研究。根据PRISMA 2020和MOOSE指南,在PubMed、APA PsycINFO和CINAHL中进行了综合检索,直到2023年12月31日。研究包括前瞻性队列研究或纵向研究,研究孤独、社会隔离、独居和死亡率之间的关系。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估质量。meta分析使用随机效应模型和限制最大似然法。亚组和元回归分析进一步探讨了这些关系。在11964项确定的研究中,有86项符合纳入标准。孤独感与全因死亡率增加相关(HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.10-1.18),存在显著异质性(I²= 84.0%)。社会隔离(HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.27-1.43)和独居(HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13-1.30)也发现了类似的关联。亚组分析揭示了基于性别、年龄、地区、慢性疾病和研究质量等因素的差异。meta回归发现,随访时间较长、女性性别、有效的社会网络指数、认知功能调整和研究质量是死亡风险的重要预测因素。这些发现强调需要采取公共卫生干预措施来解决这些社会因素并改善老年人的健康结果。然而,由于研究的可变性和异质性,需要进一步的研究。此外,研究这些因素对死亡风险的累积影响也将引起相当大的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
期刊最新文献
Effects of different types of Tai Chi intervention on motor function in older adults: a systematic review Suggestions for the decision making in subjective cognitive complaints Exploring and validating associations between six systemic inflammatory indices and ischemic stroke in a middle-aged and old Chinese population Viral infections of the central nervous system increase the risk of knee osteoarthritis: a two-sample mendelian randomization study Loneliness, social isolation, and living alone: a comprehensive systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of mortality risks in older adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1