Agroforestry as a livelihood resilience strategy: empirical evidence from the Republic of Congo and Chad

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Agroforestry Systems Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1007/s10457-025-01137-4
Nyong Princely Awazi, Claude Rovhin’s Mabiala Ngoma, Lucie Felicite Temgoua, Marie-Louise Tientcheu-Avana, Herman Zanguim, Doube Baro, Martin Ngankam Tchamba
{"title":"Agroforestry as a livelihood resilience strategy: empirical evidence from the Republic of Congo and Chad","authors":"Nyong Princely Awazi,&nbsp;Claude Rovhin’s Mabiala Ngoma,&nbsp;Lucie Felicite Temgoua,&nbsp;Marie-Louise Tientcheu-Avana,&nbsp;Herman Zanguim,&nbsp;Doube Baro,&nbsp;Martin Ngankam Tchamba","doi":"10.1007/s10457-025-01137-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Climate change is a major threat to the livelihoods of communities in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly those in the Republic of Congo and Chad. Agroforestry has been identified as a sustainable option to enhance livelihoods while limiting the threat posed by climate change. It is against this background that this study investigates the livelihood assets and resilience of agroforestry practitioners in the Republic of Congo and Chad. Making use of a mixed methods and comparative analysis approach, findings reveal different livelihood assets categorized into natural, physical, human, social, and financial capitals. Natural assets, particularly trees, are universally recognized across both countries, but water availability differs significantly, with 81% of practitioners in the Republic of Congo having access compared to only 43% in Chad. Physical assets show stark contrasts; while over 70% of practitioners in the Congo reported having access to necessary tools and irrigation systems, only 17% of those in Chad reported similar access. Human assets highlight a reliance on indigenous knowledge in both countries, yet Chad faces lower formal education levels, particularly among livestock-based agroforestry practitioners. Social capital is notably stronger in the Republic of Congo, where 72% of practitioners benefit from robust networks, compared to only 41% in Chad. Financial assets are generally low, but particularly precarious in Chad, where savings range from 8 to 26%, limiting investment capacity. Resilience scores linked to these assets reveal that agroforestry practitioners in the Republic of Congo generally demonstrate higher resilience across all categories. Regression analysis highlights a strong positive relationship between various agroforestry practices (especially food crop-based and cash crop-based systems) and livelihood resilience, with coefficients suggesting a greater impact in Chad. This underscores the urgent need for policies that enhance access to physical, human, and financial resources, particularly in Chad, to foster sustainable agricultural practices and improve food security. These findings emphasize the importance of a holistic approach to strengthen livelihood assets, enhance resilience, and promote the adoption of effective agroforestry practices in both countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"99 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01137-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change is a major threat to the livelihoods of communities in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly those in the Republic of Congo and Chad. Agroforestry has been identified as a sustainable option to enhance livelihoods while limiting the threat posed by climate change. It is against this background that this study investigates the livelihood assets and resilience of agroforestry practitioners in the Republic of Congo and Chad. Making use of a mixed methods and comparative analysis approach, findings reveal different livelihood assets categorized into natural, physical, human, social, and financial capitals. Natural assets, particularly trees, are universally recognized across both countries, but water availability differs significantly, with 81% of practitioners in the Republic of Congo having access compared to only 43% in Chad. Physical assets show stark contrasts; while over 70% of practitioners in the Congo reported having access to necessary tools and irrigation systems, only 17% of those in Chad reported similar access. Human assets highlight a reliance on indigenous knowledge in both countries, yet Chad faces lower formal education levels, particularly among livestock-based agroforestry practitioners. Social capital is notably stronger in the Republic of Congo, where 72% of practitioners benefit from robust networks, compared to only 41% in Chad. Financial assets are generally low, but particularly precarious in Chad, where savings range from 8 to 26%, limiting investment capacity. Resilience scores linked to these assets reveal that agroforestry practitioners in the Republic of Congo generally demonstrate higher resilience across all categories. Regression analysis highlights a strong positive relationship between various agroforestry practices (especially food crop-based and cash crop-based systems) and livelihood resilience, with coefficients suggesting a greater impact in Chad. This underscores the urgent need for policies that enhance access to physical, human, and financial resources, particularly in Chad, to foster sustainable agricultural practices and improve food security. These findings emphasize the importance of a holistic approach to strengthen livelihood assets, enhance resilience, and promote the adoption of effective agroforestry practices in both countries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农林业作为生计复原力战略:来自刚果共和国和乍得的经验证据
气候变化是撒哈拉以南非洲地区,特别是刚果共和国和乍得社区生计的主要威胁。农林业已被确定为在改善生计的同时限制气候变化威胁的可持续选择。正是在这种背景下,本研究调查了刚果共和国和乍得农林业从业人员的生计资产和复原力。利用混合方法和比较分析方法,研究结果揭示了不同的生计资产,分为自然资本、物质资本、人力资本、社会资本和金融资本。自然资产,特别是树木,在两国都得到普遍认可,但水的可用性差异很大,刚果共和国81%的从业者可以获得水,而乍得只有43%。实物资产呈现出鲜明的对比;在刚果,超过70%的从业人员报告获得了必要的工具和灌溉系统,而在乍得,只有17%的从业人员报告获得了类似的工具和灌溉系统。人力资源突出了两国对本土知识的依赖,然而乍得的正规教育水平较低,特别是在以牲畜为基础的农林业从业人员中。刚果共和国的社会资本明显更强,72%的从业人员受益于强大的网络,而乍得只有41%。金融资产普遍较低,但在乍得尤其不稳定,储蓄率在8%至26%之间,限制了投资能力。与这些资产相关的复原力得分显示,刚果共和国农林业从业人员在所有类别中普遍表现出更高的复原力。回归分析强调了各种农林业做法(特别是以粮食作物和经济作物为基础的系统)与生计复原力之间的强烈正相关关系,其系数表明对乍得的影响更大。这突出表明,迫切需要制定政策,增加获得物质、人力和财政资源的机会,特别是在乍得,以促进可持续农业做法和改善粮食安全。这些研究结果强调了在这两个国家采取综合方法来加强生计资产、增强抵御能力和促进采用有效农林业做法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
期刊最新文献
Biotechnical, economic, and environmental assessment of dairy systems in the Peruvian Amazon utilizing the CLEANED tool Agroforestry as a livelihood resilience strategy: empirical evidence from the Republic of Congo and Chad Detecting vertical and lateral root hydraulic redistribution based on soil-moisture alteration on cashew seedlings Plant diversity and microbial interaction on soil carbon stock in the tropical homegardens: a nature-based solution to climate change Innovative planting designs for oil palm-based agroforestry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1