Predictors of glycaemic improvement in children and young adults with type 1 diabetes and very elevated HbA1c using the MiniMed 780G system.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1111/dom.16210
Yongwen Zhou, Alisa Boucsein, Venus R Michaels, Madeleine K Gray, Craig Jefferies, Esko Wiltshire, Ryan G Paul, Amber Parry-Strong, Maheen Pasha, Goran Petrovski, Martin I de Bock, Benjamin J Wheeler
{"title":"Predictors of glycaemic improvement in children and young adults with type 1 diabetes and very elevated HbA1c using the MiniMed 780G system.","authors":"Yongwen Zhou, Alisa Boucsein, Venus R Michaels, Madeleine K Gray, Craig Jefferies, Esko Wiltshire, Ryan G Paul, Amber Parry-Strong, Maheen Pasha, Goran Petrovski, Martin I de Bock, Benjamin J Wheeler","doi":"10.1111/dom.16210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to identify key factors with the greatest influence on glycaemic outcomes in young individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and very elevated glycaemia after 3 months of automated insulin delivery (AID).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were combined and analysed from two separate and previously published studies with similar inclusion criteria assessing AID (MiniMed 780G) efficacy among young individuals naïve to AID (aged 7-25 years) with glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥69 mmol/mol (≥8.5%). Univariate and multivariate linear models were performed to explore factors leading to the greatest improvements in HbA1c and time in range 3.9-10.0 mmol/L (70-180 mg/dL; TIR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 99 young individuals (aged 17.3 ± 4.2 years; baseline HbA1c 92 ± 21 mmol/mol [10.6% ± 1.9%]) were included. After 3 months of AID use, HbA1c improved to 65 ± 16 mmol/mol (8.1% ± 1.5%) (-27 ± 23 mmol/mol; -2.5% ± 2.1% change), and TIR improved from 24.2% ± 13.5% to 58.4% ± 15.4% (p both <0.001). In the multivariate analysis, two key factors for both HbA1c and TIR improvement were identified: high baseline HbA1c (>100 mmol/mol [>11.0%]) and high time in automation mode (>80%), which led to decreased HbA1c by 27.0 mmol/mol (2.4%) and 14.2 mmol/mol (1.3%) and increased TIR by 6.1% and 11.1% (p all <0.05) respectively. Meal announcement frequency >3 times/day and glucose target of 5.5 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) also led to significant increases in TIR. No other factors, including age, prior use of multiple daily injection, ethnicity, gender and optimal active insulin time 2 h, contributed to statistically significant HbA1c or TIR improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In young individuals naive to AID, those with the highest baseline HbA1c and high percentage time in automation experience the greatest benefits after initiation of AID. Sociodemographic background and carbohydrate counting adherence/knowledge should not prevent or delay access to AID technology (ACTRN12621000556842 and ACTRN12622001454763).</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16210","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to identify key factors with the greatest influence on glycaemic outcomes in young individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and very elevated glycaemia after 3 months of automated insulin delivery (AID).

Materials and methods: Data were combined and analysed from two separate and previously published studies with similar inclusion criteria assessing AID (MiniMed 780G) efficacy among young individuals naïve to AID (aged 7-25 years) with glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥69 mmol/mol (≥8.5%). Univariate and multivariate linear models were performed to explore factors leading to the greatest improvements in HbA1c and time in range 3.9-10.0 mmol/L (70-180 mg/dL; TIR).

Results: A total of 99 young individuals (aged 17.3 ± 4.2 years; baseline HbA1c 92 ± 21 mmol/mol [10.6% ± 1.9%]) were included. After 3 months of AID use, HbA1c improved to 65 ± 16 mmol/mol (8.1% ± 1.5%) (-27 ± 23 mmol/mol; -2.5% ± 2.1% change), and TIR improved from 24.2% ± 13.5% to 58.4% ± 15.4% (p both <0.001). In the multivariate analysis, two key factors for both HbA1c and TIR improvement were identified: high baseline HbA1c (>100 mmol/mol [>11.0%]) and high time in automation mode (>80%), which led to decreased HbA1c by 27.0 mmol/mol (2.4%) and 14.2 mmol/mol (1.3%) and increased TIR by 6.1% and 11.1% (p all <0.05) respectively. Meal announcement frequency >3 times/day and glucose target of 5.5 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) also led to significant increases in TIR. No other factors, including age, prior use of multiple daily injection, ethnicity, gender and optimal active insulin time 2 h, contributed to statistically significant HbA1c or TIR improvement.

Conclusions: In young individuals naive to AID, those with the highest baseline HbA1c and high percentage time in automation experience the greatest benefits after initiation of AID. Sociodemographic background and carbohydrate counting adherence/knowledge should not prevent or delay access to AID technology (ACTRN12621000556842 and ACTRN12622001454763).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用MiniMed 780G系统预测患有1型糖尿病和HbA1c非常高的儿童和年轻人的血糖改善
目的:本研究旨在确定对年轻1型糖尿病(T1D)患者血糖结局影响最大的关键因素,这些患者在自动胰岛素给药(AID) 3个月后血糖非常高。材料和方法:对先前发表的两项独立研究的数据进行合并和分析,这些研究的纳入标准相似,评估AID (MiniMed 780G)在糖化血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)≥69 mmol/mol(≥8.5%)的年轻人naïve对AID(7-25岁)的疗效。采用单因素和多因素线性模型探讨在3.9-10.0 mmol/L (70-180 mg/dL;行动)。结果:共99例青年人(年龄17.3±4.2岁;基线HbA1c为92±21 mmol/mol[10.6%±1.9%])。AID使用3个月后,HbA1c改善至65±16 mmol/mol(8.1%±1.5%)(-27±23 mmol/mol;-2.5%±2.1%的变化),TIR从24.2%±13.5%提高到58.4%±15.4% (p均为100 mmol/mol[>11.0%])和自动化模式高时间(>80%),导致HbA1c降低27.0 mmol/mol(2.4%)和14.2 mmol/mol (1.3%), TIR升高6.1%和11.1% (p均为3次/天,葡萄糖目标为5.5 mmol/L (100 mg/dL)也导致TIR显著升高。没有其他因素,包括年龄、既往多次每日注射、种族、性别和最佳胰岛素活性时间2小时,对HbA1c或TIR的改善有统计学意义。结论:在初次接触AID的年轻人中,那些基线HbA1c最高和自动化时间百分比高的人在开始AID后获益最大。社会人口背景和碳水化合物计数依从性/知识不应阻止或延迟获得AID技术(ACTRN12621000556842和ACTRN12622001454763)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
期刊最新文献
Body weight variability as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes in type 1 diabetes: A nationwide cohort study. Future directions for quality of life research with second-generation GLP-1RAs for obesity. Safety and effects of acetylated and butyrylated high-amylose maize starch on youths recently diagnosed with type 1 diabetes: A pilot study. Non-clinical and first-in-human characterization of ECC5004/AZD5004, a novel once-daily, oral small-molecule GLP-1 receptor agonist. Association between weight reduction achieved with tirzepatide and quality of life in adults with obesity: Results from the SURMOUNT-1 study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1