Challenges and opportunities in organ donation after circulatory death.

IF 9 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1111/joim.20051
Vidgren Mathias, Delorme Capucine, Gabriel C Oniscu
{"title":"Challenges and opportunities in organ donation after circulatory death.","authors":"Vidgren Mathias, Delorme Capucine, Gabriel C Oniscu","doi":"10.1111/joim.20051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, there has been resurgence in donation after circulatory death (DCD). Despite that, the number of organs transplanted from these donors remains low due to concerns about their function and a lack of an objective assessment at the time of donation. This overview examines the current DCD practices and the classification modifications to accommodate regional perspectives. Several risk factors underscore the reluctance to accept DCD organs, and we discuss the modern strategies to mitigate them. The advent of machine perfusion technology has revolutionized the field of DCD transplantation, leading to improved outcomes and better organ usage. With many strategies at our disposal, there is an urgent need for comparative trials to determine the optimal use of perfusion technologies for each donated organ type. Additional progress in defining therapeutic strategies to repair the damage sustained during the dying process should further improve DCD organ utilization and outcomes. However, there remains wide variability in access to DCD donation and transplantation, and organizational efforts should be doubled up with consensus on key ethical issues that still surround DCD donation in the era of machine perfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.20051","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, there has been resurgence in donation after circulatory death (DCD). Despite that, the number of organs transplanted from these donors remains low due to concerns about their function and a lack of an objective assessment at the time of donation. This overview examines the current DCD practices and the classification modifications to accommodate regional perspectives. Several risk factors underscore the reluctance to accept DCD organs, and we discuss the modern strategies to mitigate them. The advent of machine perfusion technology has revolutionized the field of DCD transplantation, leading to improved outcomes and better organ usage. With many strategies at our disposal, there is an urgent need for comparative trials to determine the optimal use of perfusion technologies for each donated organ type. Additional progress in defining therapeutic strategies to repair the damage sustained during the dying process should further improve DCD organ utilization and outcomes. However, there remains wide variability in access to DCD donation and transplantation, and organizational efforts should be doubled up with consensus on key ethical issues that still surround DCD donation in the era of machine perfusion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
循环性死亡后器官捐献的挑战与机遇。
近年来,循环性死亡(DCD)后的捐赠再次兴起。尽管如此,由于对器官功能的担忧以及在捐赠时缺乏客观的评估,来自这些捐赠者的器官移植数量仍然很低。本综述考察了当前的DCD实践和为适应区域观点而进行的分类修改。几个风险因素强调不愿接受DCD器官,我们讨论现代策略来减轻他们。机器灌注技术的出现彻底改变了DCD移植领域,导致改善的结果和更好的器官使用。由于我们有许多策略可供选择,因此迫切需要进行比较试验,以确定每种捐献器官类型灌注技术的最佳使用。在确定治疗策略以修复死亡过程中持续的损伤方面的进一步进展应进一步改善DCD器官的利用和结果。然而,在获得DCD捐赠和移植方面仍然存在很大的差异,组织应该加倍努力,在机器灌注时代仍然围绕DCD捐赠的关键伦理问题上达成共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Internal Medicine
Journal of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
0.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JIM – The Journal of Internal Medicine, in continuous publication since 1863, is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal. It publishes original work in clinical science, spanning from bench to bedside, encompassing a wide range of internal medicine and its subspecialties. JIM showcases original articles, reviews, brief reports, and research letters in the field of internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Plasma brain-derived tau correlates with cerebral infarct volume. Acknowledgement to reviewers. Challenges and opportunities in organ donation after circulatory death. Diagnosis and treatment of chronic kidney diseases and Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a paradigm shift for enhancing cardiovascular prognosis. Kidney function decline improves after lithium discontinuation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1