The use of premedication for intubating very low birth weight infants in the neonatal intensive care unit: Results of a national survey.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1055/a-2521-1118
Cassandra DeMartino, Sara Neches, Megan Gray, Taylor Sawyer, Lindsay Johnston
{"title":"The use of premedication for intubating very low birth weight infants in the neonatal intensive care unit: Results of a national survey.","authors":"Cassandra DeMartino, Sara Neches, Megan Gray, Taylor Sawyer, Lindsay Johnston","doi":"10.1055/a-2521-1118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore barriers and perspectives of premedication use for non-emergent intubations of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (less than 1,500 g).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional, online survey was distributed from January to April 2023 to members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 521 respondents, the majority (81%, n=415) were neonatologists. Over half of respondents (69%, n=359) consider patient weight when selecting premedication. Most providers (78%, n=407) agreed that premedication should be used for non-emergent intubation of VLBW infants, while only 41% (n=216) felt similarly that muscle relaxants should be used. For infants over 1,500 g, 43% (n=153) reported frequent or regular muscle relaxant use compared with 28% (n=101) for VLBW infants. The most cited barrier to muscle relaxant use was surfactant delivery with planned return to non-invasive support. Unit guidelines were associated with significantly more premedication and muscle relaxant use (56% vs. 44%; OR 5.2, 95% CI 3.4-7.7, p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most neonatal providers favor premedication for non-emergent intubation but are hesitant to use muscle relaxants for VLBW infants. Premedication guidelines may facilitate the use of both premedication and muscle relaxants for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2521-1118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore barriers and perspectives of premedication use for non-emergent intubations of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (less than 1,500 g).

Study design: A cross-sectional, online survey was distributed from January to April 2023 to members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests.

Results: Of the 521 respondents, the majority (81%, n=415) were neonatologists. Over half of respondents (69%, n=359) consider patient weight when selecting premedication. Most providers (78%, n=407) agreed that premedication should be used for non-emergent intubation of VLBW infants, while only 41% (n=216) felt similarly that muscle relaxants should be used. For infants over 1,500 g, 43% (n=153) reported frequent or regular muscle relaxant use compared with 28% (n=101) for VLBW infants. The most cited barrier to muscle relaxant use was surfactant delivery with planned return to non-invasive support. Unit guidelines were associated with significantly more premedication and muscle relaxant use (56% vs. 44%; OR 5.2, 95% CI 3.4-7.7, p<0.0001).

Conclusion: Most neonatal providers favor premedication for non-emergent intubation but are hesitant to use muscle relaxants for VLBW infants. Premedication guidelines may facilitate the use of both premedication and muscle relaxants for this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在新生儿重症监护病房对极低出生体重儿插管前用药的使用:一项全国性调查的结果。
目的:探讨极低出生体重(VLBW)婴儿(小于1500 g)非紧急插管用药前使用的障碍和观点。研究设计:一项横断面在线调查于2023年1月至4月分发给美国儿科学会新生儿-围产期医学分会的成员。数据分析采用描述性统计和卡方检验。结果:在521名被调查者中,大多数(81%,n=415)是新生儿科医生。超过一半的受访者(69%,n=359)在选择药物前治疗时会考虑患者体重。大多数医护人员(78%,n=407)同意在VLBW婴儿的非紧急插管中应使用预用药,而只有41% (n=216)认为应该使用肌肉松弛剂。对于超过1500克的婴儿,43% (n=153)报告频繁或定期使用肌肉松弛剂,而VLBW婴儿为28% (n=101)。使用肌肉松弛剂最常见的障碍是表面活性剂的输送,并计划恢复无创支持。单位指南与更多的药物前治疗和肌肉松弛剂使用相关(56% vs. 44%;OR 5.2, 95% CI 3.4-7.7, p结论:大多数新生儿提供者倾向于非紧急插管前用药,但对VLBW婴儿使用肌肉松弛剂犹豫不决。药物治疗前的指导方针可以促进药物治疗前和肌肉松弛剂的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Comment on "Surgical Morbidity following Planned Hysterectomy versus Conservative Management for Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis". Prevalence of Hypovitaminosis D in Pregnancy and Potential Benefits of Oral Supplementation. Intratracheal Administration of Budesonide with Surfactant for Prevention of Death or Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants: A before-after Study. Association of Community Characteristics as Measured by Social Deprivation Index Score with Prenatal Care and Obstetrical Outcomes. Vascular Air Embolism in Neonates: A Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1