Cassandra DeMartino, Sara Neches, Megan Gray, Taylor Sawyer, Lindsay Johnston
{"title":"The use of premedication for intubating very low birth weight infants in the neonatal intensive care unit: Results of a national survey.","authors":"Cassandra DeMartino, Sara Neches, Megan Gray, Taylor Sawyer, Lindsay Johnston","doi":"10.1055/a-2521-1118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore barriers and perspectives of premedication use for non-emergent intubations of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (less than 1,500 g).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional, online survey was distributed from January to April 2023 to members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 521 respondents, the majority (81%, n=415) were neonatologists. Over half of respondents (69%, n=359) consider patient weight when selecting premedication. Most providers (78%, n=407) agreed that premedication should be used for non-emergent intubation of VLBW infants, while only 41% (n=216) felt similarly that muscle relaxants should be used. For infants over 1,500 g, 43% (n=153) reported frequent or regular muscle relaxant use compared with 28% (n=101) for VLBW infants. The most cited barrier to muscle relaxant use was surfactant delivery with planned return to non-invasive support. Unit guidelines were associated with significantly more premedication and muscle relaxant use (56% vs. 44%; OR 5.2, 95% CI 3.4-7.7, p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most neonatal providers favor premedication for non-emergent intubation but are hesitant to use muscle relaxants for VLBW infants. Premedication guidelines may facilitate the use of both premedication and muscle relaxants for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2521-1118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To explore barriers and perspectives of premedication use for non-emergent intubations of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (less than 1,500 g).
Study design: A cross-sectional, online survey was distributed from January to April 2023 to members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests.
Results: Of the 521 respondents, the majority (81%, n=415) were neonatologists. Over half of respondents (69%, n=359) consider patient weight when selecting premedication. Most providers (78%, n=407) agreed that premedication should be used for non-emergent intubation of VLBW infants, while only 41% (n=216) felt similarly that muscle relaxants should be used. For infants over 1,500 g, 43% (n=153) reported frequent or regular muscle relaxant use compared with 28% (n=101) for VLBW infants. The most cited barrier to muscle relaxant use was surfactant delivery with planned return to non-invasive support. Unit guidelines were associated with significantly more premedication and muscle relaxant use (56% vs. 44%; OR 5.2, 95% CI 3.4-7.7, p<0.0001).
Conclusion: Most neonatal providers favor premedication for non-emergent intubation but are hesitant to use muscle relaxants for VLBW infants. Premedication guidelines may facilitate the use of both premedication and muscle relaxants for this population.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields.
The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field.
All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication.
The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.