Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block in postoperative pain management of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a propensity score-matched analysis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI:10.4174/astr.2025.108.1.57
Gimin Lee, Sanghyuk Moon, Nagyeong Kim, Daeun Baek, Nak-Hoon Son, Kyeong Hwan Seo, Eunyoung Jung
{"title":"Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block in postoperative pain management of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Gimin Lee, Sanghyuk Moon, Nagyeong Kim, Daeun Baek, Nak-Hoon Son, Kyeong Hwan Seo, Eunyoung Jung","doi":"10.4174/astr.2025.108.1.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a promising technique for postoperative pain control. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the TAP block in managing postoperative pain after laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, medical records of patients who had received ultrasonography-guided TAP blocks after surgery from January 2019 to August 2023 were reviewed and compared with those of patients who had not received. Propensity score matching was controlled for age as a confounder. Postoperative pain levels were measured using the numeric rating scale (NRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 95 patients were included in each group. The TAP block group (2.7 <i>vs.</i> 4.0, P < 0.001) had significantly lower NRS scores immediately and early postoperative pain than the control group (1.9 <i>vs.</i> 2.5, P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of postoperative complications (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TAP block is effective and safe for managing immediate and early postoperative pain in laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair and does not increase the risk of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8071,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","volume":"108 1","pages":"57-63"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2025.108.1.57","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a promising technique for postoperative pain control. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the TAP block in managing postoperative pain after laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair.

Methods: In this retrospective study, medical records of patients who had received ultrasonography-guided TAP blocks after surgery from January 2019 to August 2023 were reviewed and compared with those of patients who had not received. Propensity score matching was controlled for age as a confounder. Postoperative pain levels were measured using the numeric rating scale (NRS).

Results: After matching, 95 patients were included in each group. The TAP block group (2.7 vs. 4.0, P < 0.001) had significantly lower NRS scores immediately and early postoperative pain than the control group (1.9 vs. 2.5, P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of postoperative complications (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: TAP block is effective and safe for managing immediate and early postoperative pain in laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair and does not increase the risk of complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经腹平面阻滞在腹腔镜腹股沟疝全腹膜外修补术术后疼痛管理中的疗效:倾向评分匹配分析。
目的:腹横面阻滞是一种很有前途的术后疼痛控制技术。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估TAP阻滞在腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2019年1月至2023年8月接受超声引导下TAP阻滞的患者的病历,并与未接受超声引导下TAP阻滞的患者进行比较。倾向评分匹配控制年龄作为一个混杂因素。采用数字评定量表(NRS)测量术后疼痛水平。结果:经配对后,每组纳入95例患者。TAP阻断组(2.7比4.0,P < 0.001)即刻和术后早期疼痛的NRS评分明显低于对照组(1.9比2.5,P < 0.001)。两组术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:TAP阻滞治疗腹腔镜下TEP腹股沟疝修补术即刻及早期疼痛安全有效,且不增加并发症发生风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Manuscripts to the Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research (Ann Surg Treat Res) should be written in English according to the instructions for authors. If the details are not described below, the style should follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publications available at International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) website (http://www.icmje.org).
期刊最新文献
Current status of postoperative morbidity following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastasis: a prospective single-center observational study. Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block in postoperative pain management of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a propensity score-matched analysis. Epidemiology and survival analysis according to the histologic subtype of pancreatic cancer: a population-based cohort study. Evaluation of health-related quality of life and performance in intestinal transplant and rehabilitation patients: a cross-sectional study. Investigation of the effect of perioperative parathyroid autotransplantation in incidental parathyroidectomy cases on the development of postoperative hypocalcemia: a retrospective observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1