Optimized Metolachlor, Epoxiconazole and Chlorantraniliprole Mixture Analysis for Aquatic Toxicity Testing Using UHPLC-MS/MS.

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1007/s00128-024-04000-x
María Florencia Gonzalez, Iohanna Filippi, María Valeria Amé
{"title":"Optimized Metolachlor, Epoxiconazole and Chlorantraniliprole Mixture Analysis for Aquatic Toxicity Testing Using UHPLC-MS/MS.","authors":"María Florencia Gonzalez, Iohanna Filippi, María Valeria Amé","doi":"10.1007/s00128-024-04000-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The co-occurrence of pesticides in aquatic ecosystems highlights the need for studies investigating their potential toxicity as mixtures to the aquatic biota. Well-designed studies are essential to assess the presence and toxicity of relevant pesticide mixtures, particularly those such as the chloroacetamide herbicide metolachlor (MET), the triazole fungicide epoxiconazole (EP) and the diamide anthranilic insecticide chlorantraniliprole (CAP), which have not been previously tested, and whose co-occurrence is possible in waters close to cultivated areas. A solid phase extraction ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry method was developed to quantify equivalent toxicity concentrations for CAP, EP, and MET in artificial freshwater during acute toxicity tests. Compounds were separated within 1.30 min, showing linearity over the calibration ranges of 2-150 µgL<sup>-1</sup> for CAP and 50-3000 µgL<sup>-1</sup> for EP and MET. Detection and quantification limits were (µgL<sup>-1</sup>): 0.001 and 0.0037 MET; 0.000038 and 0.00013 EP; and 0.002 and 0.007 CAP, respectively. Precision and accuracy met intra-assay validation requirements. Recoveries were tested at low and high concentration levels and were between 77% and 120%. Additionally, matrix effect showed different behavior among compounds. In an acute toxicity test proposed, MET and EP remained stable (24 h), while CAP decayed 27% ± 4% in the same period. The method proved effective despite different concentrations in toxicity testing design.</p>","PeriodicalId":501,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology","volume":"114 2","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-024-04000-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The co-occurrence of pesticides in aquatic ecosystems highlights the need for studies investigating their potential toxicity as mixtures to the aquatic biota. Well-designed studies are essential to assess the presence and toxicity of relevant pesticide mixtures, particularly those such as the chloroacetamide herbicide metolachlor (MET), the triazole fungicide epoxiconazole (EP) and the diamide anthranilic insecticide chlorantraniliprole (CAP), which have not been previously tested, and whose co-occurrence is possible in waters close to cultivated areas. A solid phase extraction ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry method was developed to quantify equivalent toxicity concentrations for CAP, EP, and MET in artificial freshwater during acute toxicity tests. Compounds were separated within 1.30 min, showing linearity over the calibration ranges of 2-150 µgL-1 for CAP and 50-3000 µgL-1 for EP and MET. Detection and quantification limits were (µgL-1): 0.001 and 0.0037 MET; 0.000038 and 0.00013 EP; and 0.002 and 0.007 CAP, respectively. Precision and accuracy met intra-assay validation requirements. Recoveries were tested at low and high concentration levels and were between 77% and 120%. Additionally, matrix effect showed different behavior among compounds. In an acute toxicity test proposed, MET and EP remained stable (24 h), while CAP decayed 27% ± 4% in the same period. The method proved effective despite different concentrations in toxicity testing design.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超高效液相色谱-质谱联用优化甲草胺、环氧康唑和氯虫腈混合物的水生毒性分析。
农药在水生生态系统中的共存突出表明有必要研究它们作为混合物对水生生物群的潜在毒性。设计良好的研究对于评估相关农药混合物的存在和毒性至关重要,特别是氯乙酰胺除草剂异丙草胺(MET)、三唑类杀菌剂环氧康唑(EP)和二胺类杀虫剂氯虫腈(CAP)等以前没有经过测试的农药混合物,它们可能在靠近耕地的水域同时出现。建立了一种固相萃取超高效液相色谱-串联四极杆质谱法,用于定量急性毒性试验中人工淡水中CAP、EP和MET的等效毒性浓度。化合物在1.30 min内分离,在CAP的2-150µgL-1和EP和MET的50-3000µgL-1的校准范围内呈线性。检测和定量限为(µgL-1): 0.001和0.0037 MET;0.000038和0.00013 EP;0.002和0.007 CAP。精密度和准确度均满足分析内验证要求。在低浓度和高浓度水平下进行了回收率测试,回收率在77% ~ 120%之间。此外,基质效应在不同化合物间表现出不同的行为。在急性毒性试验中,MET和EP保持稳定(24 h),而CAP在同一时期衰减27%±4%。在不同浓度的毒性试验设计中,证明了该方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
230
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology(BECT) is a peer-reviewed journal that offers rapid review and publication. Accepted submissions will be presented as clear, concise reports of current research for a readership concerned with environmental contamination and toxicology. Scientific quality and clarity are paramount.
期刊最新文献
Dioxins and Related Compounds in Sediment and Soil from Craft Villages and Industrial Areas in Northern Vietnam. Concentration of Two Herbicides, Irgarol 1051 and Diuron, in Coastal Waters of Coral Reefs and Adjacent Waters in the Northwestern Part of Okinawa Island, Japan. Wavelet-Based Method for Variations of Microplastics over a Monthly Lunar Tidal Cycle in Beach Sediments of Maowei Bay, China. Evaluation of Heavy Metal Contamination from Large-scale Swine-Farming Wastewater in Sichuan Province, China: Removal Efficiency, Spatial Distribution and Risk Assessment. Removal of Antibiotics in Breeding Wastewater Tailwater Using Microalgae-Based Process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1