Primary versus secondary recurrent pregnancy losses: Clinical findings and live birth rate after comprehensive work-up and personalized management.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1111/aogs.15050
Chiara Tersigni, Marianna Onori, Giuliana Beneduce, Fabio Sannino, Rita Franco, Andrea Busnelli, Chiara Granieri, Domenico Milardi, Alfredo Pontecorvi, Antonio Lanzone, Giovanni Scambia, Nicoletta Di Simone
{"title":"Primary versus secondary recurrent pregnancy losses: Clinical findings and live birth rate after comprehensive work-up and personalized management.","authors":"Chiara Tersigni, Marianna Onori, Giuliana Beneduce, Fabio Sannino, Rita Franco, Andrea Busnelli, Chiara Granieri, Domenico Milardi, Alfredo Pontecorvi, Antonio Lanzone, Giovanni Scambia, Nicoletta Di Simone","doi":"10.1111/aogs.15050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), defined as two or more consecutive pregnancy losses before 24 weeks of gestation, affects up to 1%-2% of couples. Aim of this retrospective cohort study was to report the main causes and pregnancy outcomes of a cohort of women with RPL and the efficacy of a personalized work-up and treatment in terms of live birth rate.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Women with primary (pRPL) and secondary (sRPL) RPL underwent a complete work-up and personalized therapeutic management. Data related to clinical findings and subsequent pregnancy outcomes were collected. A retrospective comparison between clinical findings and pregnancy outcomes of pRPL versus sRPL was performed by Mann-Whitney U or Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Main findings after diagnostic work-up in pRPL (n = 157) versus sRPL (n = 138) couples were hormonal and metabolic factors (75% vs. 90%, p < 0.01), autoimmunity (52% vs. 59%, p = 0.2), acquired uterine/endometrial factors (43% vs. 34%, p = 0.2), vaginal and/or cervical infections (19% vs. 49%; p < 0.0001), congenital Mullerian anomalies (15% vs. 9%; p = 0.1), inherited thrombophilias (13% vs. 21%; p = 0.1), female karyotype abnormalities (2% vs. 2%; p = 0.9), sperm infections (27% vs. 22%; p = 0.1), abnormal semen analysis (17% vs. 14%; p = 0.1), male karyotype abnormalities (2% vs. 0%; p = 0.1). Higher pregnancy and fetal loss rate was observed in pRPL compared with sRPL (85% vs. 56%, p < 0.0001and 9% vs. 0%, p < 0.01, respectively). Higher live birth rate was found in pRLP versus sRPL women (76% vs. 56%, p < 0.001). Increased live birth rate was observed among pRPL women aged <40 years (OR 2.76; CI 1.36-5.64, p < 0.01) and/or with an AMH >1 ng/mL (OR 3.96; CI 1.34-12.52, p < 0.05). Among sRPL women, the age < 40 years was significantly associated to higher live birth rate (OR 3.23; 1.55-6.94, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RPL is a heterogeneous multifactorial syndrome. A customized management can lead to a good pregnancy outcome in more than a half of cases. Age <40 and AMH >1 ng/mL are the major positive predictors of live birth rate in RPL women.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.15050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), defined as two or more consecutive pregnancy losses before 24 weeks of gestation, affects up to 1%-2% of couples. Aim of this retrospective cohort study was to report the main causes and pregnancy outcomes of a cohort of women with RPL and the efficacy of a personalized work-up and treatment in terms of live birth rate.

Material and methods: Women with primary (pRPL) and secondary (sRPL) RPL underwent a complete work-up and personalized therapeutic management. Data related to clinical findings and subsequent pregnancy outcomes were collected. A retrospective comparison between clinical findings and pregnancy outcomes of pRPL versus sRPL was performed by Mann-Whitney U or Chi-square test.

Results: Main findings after diagnostic work-up in pRPL (n = 157) versus sRPL (n = 138) couples were hormonal and metabolic factors (75% vs. 90%, p < 0.01), autoimmunity (52% vs. 59%, p = 0.2), acquired uterine/endometrial factors (43% vs. 34%, p = 0.2), vaginal and/or cervical infections (19% vs. 49%; p < 0.0001), congenital Mullerian anomalies (15% vs. 9%; p = 0.1), inherited thrombophilias (13% vs. 21%; p = 0.1), female karyotype abnormalities (2% vs. 2%; p = 0.9), sperm infections (27% vs. 22%; p = 0.1), abnormal semen analysis (17% vs. 14%; p = 0.1), male karyotype abnormalities (2% vs. 0%; p = 0.1). Higher pregnancy and fetal loss rate was observed in pRPL compared with sRPL (85% vs. 56%, p < 0.0001and 9% vs. 0%, p < 0.01, respectively). Higher live birth rate was found in pRLP versus sRPL women (76% vs. 56%, p < 0.001). Increased live birth rate was observed among pRPL women aged <40 years (OR 2.76; CI 1.36-5.64, p < 0.01) and/or with an AMH >1 ng/mL (OR 3.96; CI 1.34-12.52, p < 0.05). Among sRPL women, the age < 40 years was significantly associated to higher live birth rate (OR 3.23; 1.55-6.94, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: RPL is a heterogeneous multifactorial syndrome. A customized management can lead to a good pregnancy outcome in more than a half of cases. Age <40 and AMH >1 ng/mL are the major positive predictors of live birth rate in RPL women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性与继发性复发性妊娠损失:综合检查和个性化管理后的临床表现和活产率。
复发性妊娠丢失(RPL),定义为妊娠24周前两次或两次以上连续妊娠丢失,影响高达1%-2%的夫妇。本回顾性队列研究的目的是报告一组RPL妇女的主要原因和妊娠结局,以及根据活产率进行个性化检查和治疗的效果。材料和方法:原发性(pRPL)和继发性(sRPL) RPL的女性接受了完整的检查和个性化的治疗管理。收集与临床表现和随后妊娠结局相关的数据。采用Mann-Whitney U或卡方检验对pRPL和sRPL的临床表现和妊娠结局进行回顾性比较。结果:pRPL夫妇(n = 157)和sRPL夫妇(n = 138)诊断检查后的主要发现是激素和代谢因素(75% vs. 90%, p 1 ng/mL (OR 3.96;结论:RPL是一种异质性多因素综合征。在超过一半的情况下,定制的管理可以导致良好的妊娠结局。年龄1 ng/mL是RPL妇女活产率的主要阳性预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
Fetal rotation examined with ultrasound. Reframing spontaneous preterm birth as a preventable adverse outcome-A clinical audit of a preventative toolbox. A comparison of the treatment outcome of Asherman's syndrome which developed within and outside the puerperal period: A matched cohort study. A decade of human uterus transplantation. Associations between sociodemographic and obstetric factors, and childbirth experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1