Unloader brace or high tibial osteotomy in the treatment of the young patient with medial knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Acta Orthopaedica Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.2340/17453674.2025.42846
Mark Stam, Joost Verschueren, Mark V Van Outeren, Reinoud W Brouwer, Robert D A Gaasbeek, Sorin G Blendea, Eline M Van Es, Max Reijman, Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra
{"title":"Unloader brace or high tibial osteotomy in the treatment of the young patient with medial knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Mark Stam, Joost Verschueren, Mark V Van Outeren, Reinoud W Brouwer, Robert D A Gaasbeek, Sorin G Blendea, Eline M Van Es, Max Reijman, Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2025.42846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> For medial knee osteoarthritis (OA), operative and nonoperative treatment options are available. Two widely applied unloading therapies are a valgus unloader brace and a high tibial osteotomy (HTO). We aimed to compare the effects of a valgus unloader knee brace with an HTO on knee pain after 1 year in patients with symptomatic medial knee OA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited patients from 9 Dutch hospitals between August 2014 and February 2019 for an open-labeled multi-center randomized controlled trial (Dutch Trial Register NL4200). Patients aged 18 to 65 years with symptomatic medial compartmental knee OA were randomized to either a valgus unloader brace or an HTO. The primary outcome was the pain subscale of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score (KOOS) after 1 year. Patients were evaluated at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> 51 patients were included in the study, of whom 23 were randomized to the unloader brace and 28 to the HTO. The HTO, compared with the unloader brace, showed a significant and clinically relevant difference at 12 months of follow-up in KOOS pain of -28 (95% confidence interval -43 to -13).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> We found that, on group level, an HTO is more effective in reducing knee pain than an unloader brace after 12 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"96 ","pages":"102-109"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.42846","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose:  For medial knee osteoarthritis (OA), operative and nonoperative treatment options are available. Two widely applied unloading therapies are a valgus unloader brace and a high tibial osteotomy (HTO). We aimed to compare the effects of a valgus unloader knee brace with an HTO on knee pain after 1 year in patients with symptomatic medial knee OA.

Methods: We recruited patients from 9 Dutch hospitals between August 2014 and February 2019 for an open-labeled multi-center randomized controlled trial (Dutch Trial Register NL4200). Patients aged 18 to 65 years with symptomatic medial compartmental knee OA were randomized to either a valgus unloader brace or an HTO. The primary outcome was the pain subscale of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score (KOOS) after 1 year. Patients were evaluated at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.

Results:  51 patients were included in the study, of whom 23 were randomized to the unloader brace and 28 to the HTO. The HTO, compared with the unloader brace, showed a significant and clinically relevant difference at 12 months of follow-up in KOOS pain of -28 (95% confidence interval -43 to -13).

Conclusion:  We found that, on group level, an HTO is more effective in reducing knee pain than an unloader brace after 12 months.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卸载支架或胫骨高位截骨治疗年轻膝内侧骨性关节炎患者:一项随机对照试验。
背景和目的:对于内侧膝骨关节炎(OA),有手术和非手术治疗两种选择。两种广泛应用的卸骨疗法是外翻卸骨支架和胫骨高位截骨(HTO)。我们的目的是比较外翻减压膝关节支架和HTO对症状性膝内侧OA患者1年后膝关节疼痛的影响。方法:2014年8月至2019年2月,我们从9家荷兰医院招募患者进行开放标签多中心随机对照试验(荷兰试验注册NL4200)。年龄在18岁到65岁之间的有症状的内侧隔室性膝关节炎患者被随机分配到外翻卸载支架或HTO。主要结局是1年后膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(kos)的疼痛亚量表。分别在3、6、9、12和24个月对患者进行评估。结果:51例患者纳入研究,其中23例随机分配到卸载支架组,28例随机分配到HTO组。与卸载支架相比,HTO在12个月的随访中显示出显著的临床相关差异,oos疼痛为-28(95%可信区间为-43至-13)。结论:我们发现,在组水平上,在12个月后,HTO比卸载支架更有效地减轻膝关节疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
期刊最新文献
Arthroplasty registries at a glance: an initiative of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR) to facilitate access, understanding, and reporting of registry data from an international perspective. Assessment of improvement in functional outcomes between a novel knee replacement design and conventional designs in 240 patients: a randomized controlled trial. Curve progression in non-surgically treated patients with idiopathic scoliosis: a cohort study with 40-year follow-up. Mortality and reoperations following treatment of acetabular fractures in patients ≥ 70 years: a retrospective cohort study of 247 patients. Unloader brace or high tibial osteotomy in the treatment of the young patient with medial knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1