Xinran Zhong, Mahbubur Rahman, Ambrosia Simmons, Xingzhe Li, Malgorzata Kozak, Neil Desai, Robert Timmerman, Andrew Godley, Bin Cai, David Parsons, Kiran A Kumar, Mu-Han Lin
{"title":"Cone Beam Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy: A Promising Approach for Gastric Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma?","authors":"Xinran Zhong, Mahbubur Rahman, Ambrosia Simmons, Xingzhe Li, Malgorzata Kozak, Neil Desai, Robert Timmerman, Andrew Godley, Bin Cai, David Parsons, Kiran A Kumar, Mu-Han Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Daily online adaptive radiation therapy (oART) opens the opportunity to treat gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma with a reduced margin. This study reports our early experience of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based daily oART treating gastric MALT lymphoma with breath-hold and reduced margins.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Ten patients were treated on a CBCT-based oART system. Organs at risk (OARs) and the clinical target volume (CTV) were adjusted based on the daily CBCT. Planning target volume (PTV) was derived from the CTV with a 0.5 to 0.7 cm margin with breath-hold. Multiple beam arrangements were compared during the preplanning phase to ensure minimal monitor unit (MU) for patient comfort and breath-hold reproducibility. For 108 fractions from the 10 patients, the PTV, CTV coverage, and Paddick conformity index (CI) were compared between the adapted and scheduled plans. The MU, Paddick CI, and gradient index were compared using relative percentage differences between the adapted plans and preplans. The OAR doses from 106 fractions across 9 patients were reported for the preplans, adapted plans, and scheduled plans. The time statistics for each step of the clinical workflow were recorded and reported for 93 treatment fractions from 9 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PTV volume varied from -37.1% to 90.5% (11.7% ± 18.5%) throughout treatments across all patients. The adapted plan was chosen as the treatment plan for each fraction because of superior PTV and CTV coverage while maintaining a similar OAR dose. The PTV and CTV coverage for the adapted and scheduled plans was V<sub>Rx</sub> = 95.0% ± 0.3% versus 64.1 ± 19.6% and V<sub>Rx</sub> = 99.9 ± 0.1% versus 74.0% ± 22.2%, respectively. The adapted plans' MU, Paddick CI, and gradient index were, on average, 4.1%, 0.4%, and -4.2% of the preplan values, respectively. The console's adaptive workflow and physician time were 25 ± 7 and 19 ± 6 minutes, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A CBCT-based oART system with the proposed workflow is feasible for treating patients with gastric MALT lymphoma using a reduced PTV margin while maintaining excellent target coverage within a reasonable time, resulting in consistent adapted plan quality. This approach can be expanded to a larger cohort of gastrointestinal patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 2","pages":"101692"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2024.101692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Daily online adaptive radiation therapy (oART) opens the opportunity to treat gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma with a reduced margin. This study reports our early experience of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based daily oART treating gastric MALT lymphoma with breath-hold and reduced margins.
Methods and materials: Ten patients were treated on a CBCT-based oART system. Organs at risk (OARs) and the clinical target volume (CTV) were adjusted based on the daily CBCT. Planning target volume (PTV) was derived from the CTV with a 0.5 to 0.7 cm margin with breath-hold. Multiple beam arrangements were compared during the preplanning phase to ensure minimal monitor unit (MU) for patient comfort and breath-hold reproducibility. For 108 fractions from the 10 patients, the PTV, CTV coverage, and Paddick conformity index (CI) were compared between the adapted and scheduled plans. The MU, Paddick CI, and gradient index were compared using relative percentage differences between the adapted plans and preplans. The OAR doses from 106 fractions across 9 patients were reported for the preplans, adapted plans, and scheduled plans. The time statistics for each step of the clinical workflow were recorded and reported for 93 treatment fractions from 9 patients.
Results: The PTV volume varied from -37.1% to 90.5% (11.7% ± 18.5%) throughout treatments across all patients. The adapted plan was chosen as the treatment plan for each fraction because of superior PTV and CTV coverage while maintaining a similar OAR dose. The PTV and CTV coverage for the adapted and scheduled plans was VRx = 95.0% ± 0.3% versus 64.1 ± 19.6% and VRx = 99.9 ± 0.1% versus 74.0% ± 22.2%, respectively. The adapted plans' MU, Paddick CI, and gradient index were, on average, 4.1%, 0.4%, and -4.2% of the preplan values, respectively. The console's adaptive workflow and physician time were 25 ± 7 and 19 ± 6 minutes, respectively.
Conclusion: A CBCT-based oART system with the proposed workflow is feasible for treating patients with gastric MALT lymphoma using a reduced PTV margin while maintaining excellent target coverage within a reasonable time, resulting in consistent adapted plan quality. This approach can be expanded to a larger cohort of gastrointestinal patients.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.